Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

STS-135 Launch Coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:33 AM
Original message
STS-135 Launch Coverage
Source: NASA

Atlantis Flying through 'Max Q'
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:30:01 AM EDT

Now just about a minute after launch, the flight continues to go well as Atlantis reaches "max Q," the area in Earth's atmosphere where aerodynamic pressure on the vehicle reaches its peak.


LIFTOFF of Atlantis!
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:29:09 AM EDT

Booster ignition and liftoff of Atlantis! The shuttle's main engines and two solid rocket boosters are generating a thundering farewell as Atlantis quickly climbs up and away from Launch Pad 39A on a getaway path to orbit. After 30 years and 135 missions, residents and visitors to Florida's Space Coast are seeing this rocket's red glare for the last time.

Once Atlantis clears the tower, the flight control team takes charge, led by Flight Director Richard Jones. Astronaut Barry Wilmore is today's ascent capcom, or spacecraft communicator, meaning he'll stay in contact with Commander Chris Ferguson over an air-to-ground channel throughout the trip to orbit.


T-1 Minute and Counting
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:25:48 AM EDT

Causeways and beaches throughout Brevard County, Fla., are lined with RVs, tents, cars and pedestrians, all waiting to experience the light and thunder of a space shuttle launch for the last time.




Read more: STS-135 Launch Coverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Was listening on the radio. Goosebumps. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm lucky enough to have watched it on TV -- EVERYBODY
was covering it, which is as it should be.

I was crying - feel like I'm watching a friend die. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. (sniff)
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, me too, a little.
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. A lot of that for me. I remember watching John Glenn's Mercury launch in 1962.
The first American in orbit, now I'm seeing what will likely be the last for some time.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I stayed up until 5am one night in 1989...
...with the TV tuned to PBS. Just so I could watch the live image returns from Voyager 2 as it passed by Neptune.


I was 13. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's up and away...
...watched the hi-def NASA streaming.


Beautiful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I saw Alan Shepard lift off.
Now the final shuttle. The space program from beginning to end - if the plutocrats keep looting the country.

It's just not the same without Walter Cronkite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Missed it by 20 minutes because of some fucking stupid meeting at work.
God that pisses me off something fierce. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Here you go - launch video - - the external fuel tank view is pretty cool
STS-135 Space Shuttle Launch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EFuLap5Pgg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thanks. I really wanted to see it live (on the internet) but this is a nice consolation prize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Last time any of us will likely see Americans sent in to space
And to save a trivial amount of money. Or perhaps just because we lost the nerve for further exploration.


The Chinese did much the same thing in the 15th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You know what I say - - End the Wars - save the shuttle.
Air Conditioning The Military Costs More Than NASA's Entire Budget

It costs $1 billion more than NASA's budget just to provide air conditioning for temporary tents and housing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The total cost of keeping troops cool comes to roughly $20 billion. That figure comes from Steve Anderson, a retired brigadier general who was Gen. Petraeus' chief logistician in Iraq.

NASA's total budget is just $19 billion.

http://spacereport.blogspot.com/2011/06/june-22-2011.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't want them to save the shuttle so much as come up with a next gen replacement
and actually leave Earth orbit for the first time in 40 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yeah, I'd be happy if they were scrapping the shuttle to be replaced with something better
but just giving up after we've spent so much money and so many lives to do something no other nation has ever done? It's a national disgrace.

I'm fairly ashamed of our values at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. The plasma engine is going to get a test in space - - years away from actual spaceflight though
NASA to Test Revolutionary MagnetoPlasma Engine In Space

Nasa will soon announce plans to test a revolutionary new drive system aboard the International Space Station. The propulsion tech in question is a plasma engine known as Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR).



According to Flight International, NASA supremo Michael Griffin says that his agency is "at the end stages of agreeing a co-operative agreement for NASA to test the VASIMR engine on station".

The plasma drive is intended to work by using electric power to blast hydrogen reaction mass from its rocket nozzles at a much greater velocity than normal chemically-fuelled rockets can achieve. This means that the carrying spacecraft gets a lot more acceleration or deceleration from a given amount of fuel, and so can potentially make interplanetary journeys in much shorter times. Another potential application seen for VASIMR is maintenance of the space station's orbit, without the need to burn off colossal amounts of chemical rocket fuel.

In the near future, for lower-thrust applications at Earth orbit or closer to the sun, plasma drives could draw their power from solar panels - the mainstream means of electricity generation in spacecraft today. The proposed ISS orbit-maintenance plan would be on this model. But more ambitious uses for the electric rockets, such as carrying humans on fast interplanetary journeys*, would require higher output, probably from onboard nuclear powerplants.


http://www.nextenergynews.com/news08/next-energy-news8.12.08b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sadly that won't happen
maybe if NASA promised to blow up shit on the moon with some high definition cameras recording it from orbit we could get people behind it.

Imagine that: a 4th of july celebration that involves nuking the moon. No need to worry about burn bans or anything. Hell yeah! Get er done.

Oh well. We've chosen decline and obscurity. Just as the emperors of china did in the 15th century. Perhaps things will come full circle and our descendents will end up being cheap labor for their spoiled lazy asses as they are innovating new technologies and having bold dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. I had planned to go to this with my dad, girlfriend and her dad
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 03:53 AM by Sen. Walter Sobchak
Her father was a contractor on the shuttle facility at Vandenberg AFB and my dad always had the space bug and she is just a speedoholic and cums for anything fast and loud. We just couldn't line things up with her work schedule.

This will be recorded as one of the representative events in American decline from our post war peak. Whatever replaces it will probably make billions for defense contractors and probably never successfully enter service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC