Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals Court Backs (NFL) Lockout, Tosses Judge's Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:13 PM
Original message
Appeals Court Backs (NFL) Lockout, Tosses Judge's Ruling
Source: AP

By BARRY WILNER

NEW YORK (AP) - The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out a judge's order lifting the NFL lockout, handing the league a victory as players and owners returned to negotiations.

The ruling was issued shortly after NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and NFLPA chief DeMaurice Smith opened a second straight day of labor talks at a law firm in Manhattan.

The court vacated an April 25 decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson that the lockout should be lifted because players were suffering irreparable harm. The appeals court had already put that order on hold and said in its ruling that Nelson ignored federal law in reaching her decision.

"While we respect the court's decision, today's ruling does not change our mutual recognition that this matter must be resolved through negotiation," the league and NFLPA said in a joint statement. "We are committed to our current discussions and reaching a fair agreement that will benefit all parties for years to come, and allow for a full 2011 season."

Read more: http://sports.excite.com/news/07082011/v2697.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. NFLPA? I thought they were disbanded and ancient history...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. A pox on both sides.
Greedy and greedier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. bullshit
the owners wanted to change the deal because they were so desperately poor. The owners orchestrated this. Place the blame where it belongs.

NFL players are just highly skilled/specialized workers. They have a right to bargain for the best deal they can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Even if we go with the high average of a career of 6-7 years,
there are so few football players who will ever have the talent to play in the NFL why would anyone begrudge a player from making as much money as possible in that amount of time given the sill level it takes to play in the NFL?

As long as there is no extortion or a gun being placed to anyone's head, NFL players deserve to get as much money as they can just like the rest of us should or would like to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The same can be said for the owners of the teams deserving to get
as much money as they can since they do own the teams and no ones putting a gun to the players heads to only play for the NFL, just saying is all.
Personally though it wouldnt bother me if the entire NFL went bankrupt as I am not sports fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Does that include the owners?
Do they also deserve to get as much money as they can just like the rest of us should or would like to do?

I'm not trying to be a jerk with the question, I just find myself wondering where everyone's cutoff is. When I hear your argument at work, it seems that people there think it only applies to the players.

Personally, I'm disgusted by both sides - so much so that I couldn't care less if we have a season this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. absolutely it does
They had every right to end the labor agreement as it stood, but don't hand be this unadulterated bullshit about "both sides" when the owners are ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE for the lockout. The players didn't strike, didn't demand any more money. It was the poor persecuted owners who decided to screw this up, not the players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Maybe I misread it but havent the players done some questionable things?
By that I mean didnt they dissolve their union and then file a lawsuit trying to claim the NFL is a monopoly or some such?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. the players have done nothing wrong
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 12:17 PM by HankyDubs
The union de-certified as a tactic in the negotiation. There isn't anything even remotely shady about that.

The NFL IS a monopoly, which everyone knows. The NFL also deliberately deceives players about what their actual revenues are, and signed new TV deals in order to get more money even though they knew they were going to lock the players out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. My apologies then
I didnt realize that no one else could form a new football league.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I suggest you give it a try
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 02:33 PM by HankyDubs
see how it works out. The NFL has an anti-trust exemption. It is a monopoly. There is no debate on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'll pass on
forming my own league as I dont watch sports.
Though I wonder if the players have the money and or will to do it, it would after all require them to make a substantial investment in time and money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I agree with most things you're saying
and am with 100% when it comes to this labor dispute but only MLB has a true antitrust exemption(which was a questionable decision at-best). However before I go further I notice you say "an" which could apply they limited antitrust exemptions which the NFL & other leagues do. So I apologize if that is what you meant.

The exemption is the NFL could negotiate league-wide broadcasting rights. The concession was they had to promise they would not compete with college or high school which is why I see the NFL not have any Saturday games until near the end of the season when the college regular season is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. They had to
in order to sue on antitrust grounds. It stems from the Supreme Court decision Brown v. Pro Football, Inc. which stated the players association would have to decertify before a player could sue on antitrust grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. The owners get FREE taxer pd 4 stadiums, traffic control, etc

The players were happy with the old contract. They didn't ask for anything new. The owners wanted more games per year for less money. They cancelled the exiting contract. I back the players.

Os

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Agree! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Even...
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 02:37 AM by Archae
Brett Favre, Randy Moss, Jim McMahon, the Vikings, and the Cowboys?

They all deserve all that money? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. yes, they deserve it.
Brett Favre, like him or hate him (I hate him) was a terrific value for years and years and years, never missing a game and setting virtually every meaningful record at his position.

The players earn the going market rate for their services.

If you want to get into a discussion about why we pay athletes millions while pilots need food stamps to make ends meet, that's different. But in the current universe the players earn every single fucking penny.

And when you see how so many of the greatest players in the sport end up dead before they reach 60 (Walter Payton and Reggie White come to mind) I'll say again: Every single fucking penny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Agree!
I mean it's the players' talent that sells those team jerseys and makes fortunes for the owners.

The owners are trying to bust a union. They build these stadiums on taxpayers' backs or threaten to leave -- and it's usually up to the city and taxpayers to demolish the older stadiums, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laser_red Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. if the average career was 3 and out...
would that make any difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
4.  The Owners and their Judges
Justice in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. NFL Lockout Could Cost $160 Million, 115,000 Jobs

http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/12/03/nfl-lockout-could-cost-160-million-115000-jobs/

by James Parks, Dec 3, 2010

If the National Football League owners lock out the players next season, not only will millions of fans not have games to watch on Sunday afternoon, but more than 115,000 jobs could be lost, according to a new study.

The 32 NFL teams employ on average 3,739 people each, including players, concession workers and office staff. If the lockout lasts a long time, layoffs are likely and many of those jobs would not come back, said Jesse David, senior vice president of the economic consulting firm Edgeworth Economics, who conducted a study of the impact of a lockout for the NFL Players Association (NFLPA). Check out a summary of the study here.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EA0N0X58-OI&feature=player_embedded

Not only are the players affected, but the jobs of more than 25,000 concession workers at stadiums across the country are threatened by the lockout. (See video above.)

In a telephone press conference this morning, David and NFLPA official George Atallah said each NFL home game generates on average $20 million for the team and the community. A lockout could cost each of the 32 NFL cities. as much as $160 million, they said.

“A lockout would have an impact beyond the players,” Atallah said.

We want to raise public consciousness of the effect if the owners lock out the players.

FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC