Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama, congressional leaders don’t make headway on debt limit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:18 PM
Original message
Obama, congressional leaders don’t make headway on debt limit
Source: Washington Post

Talks between President Obama and congressional leaders Sunday evening failed to break a partisan stalemate over how to raise the federal borrowing limit, leaving the politically charged negotiations in limbo with three weeks remaining before the administration says the country will begin to default.

Two of President Obama’s top advisers had said earlier in the day that he would continue to press for a far-reaching, $4 trillion deal to cut the deficit, despite new opposition from Republican leaders to such a compromise.

The White House meeting adjourned after 80 minutes without agreement over how far the parties should go in cutting the deficit over the next decade and whether tax cuts and entitlement reform should be a part of any deal.

White House Chief of Staff William M. Daley and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said on the Sunday political talk shows that Obama still believes in a deal that would reduce the deficit through a combination of spending cuts, entitlement reforms and tax increases. . .

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obama-will-still-seek-a-4-trillion-debt-deal-despite-gop-opposition-aides-say/2011/07/10/gIQAOKq86H_story.html



80 minutes, that's it? Guess they got nowhere. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid still safe for now. This is going to be a crazy next 10 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gosh, a whole 80 minutes? Just long enough to prove there was a
meeting and drink some coffee, perhaps a nice pastry, smoke a bit?

Kind of like an AA meeting, but without any chance of success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dept of Beer Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's encouraging. Perhaps this is not theater after all.

We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is too soon...
It has been made clear we have until August 2nd.

For a deal to be hashed out before 11:45pm August 1st means the loser can't explain how they didn't have a choice.

Also, if a deal is made any earlier there would be time to read the bill, the loser nor winner want that. By the time the American people know what was really given away they will have moved on to something new in the news cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. "whether tax cuts and entitlement reform should be a part of any deal"
The White House meeting adjourned after 80 minutes without agreement over how far the parties should go in cutting the deficit over the next decade and whether tax cuts and entitlement reform should be a part of any deal.

Perhaps it was a mistake missed by the editors, but how did "tax cuts" suddenly come into play? He probably meant tax increases, but a 30-year habit of always typing 'tax cuts' is hard to break. It's probably a hot key on the reporter's keyboard.

In any case, I still think this is all mere theater where the GOP's professed position is really intended to provide political cover for Obama while he does their (and his too, really) dirty work. Then we're told that what was done was "a necessary compromise."

This is the exact scenario they played for both health care "reform" and extending the bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh come on. It's all so Obama can do the Republicans' dirty work?
And they're providing cover for him? Do people really believe that?

Yeah, there's a theatrical component to it all, as with all politics, but some grand conspiracy is a stretch, in my opinion.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, I'm not saying Obama is doing the Republicans' dirty work.
What I'm saying is that what we end up with is likely what Obama wants and believes in and the rest is theater. This includes the show he put on to get elected. Obama's performance since his election reveals him to be quite the conservative, just not the "crazy" kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for your response. What role do you think Congress plays in it all?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Congress can either make it or break it, right? Coming to
an agreement is only part of it, getting your party to support your position is another (although the Republicans do whatever their leaders tell them).

Unless Obama can bypass them -- is that possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So how is life out on the fringe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. So in other words trial baloons were floated
The entire left was infuriated, Seniors scared to high heaven. And the President didn't even get a deal done.

In the mean time we are all just left to wonder exactly how bad it will be in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. A deal will get done, actual governing requires compromise, and the Pubs KNOW it must get done or
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 09:21 PM by RBInMaine
THEY will be ANIHILATED in 2012. Obama is the smartest chess player in the world. He has said over and over that he is willing to go with a balanced approach that will anger the wings of both parties. If the RePUKES hold out and allow default over private jet tax breaks, they KNOW that they are TOAST next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Compromise or cave in?
Maybe we can get eight additional years of Bush tax cuts from Obama, in addition to "entitlement reform."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I actually heard that Boehner agreed to let the extension quietly
end. Don't know if that's true, and even if it is, plenty of the others would raise holy hell.

It has to be a compromise. That's real life and that's politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. No surprise that T. Geithner wants "entitlement reforms."
Pete Peterson chaired the committee that appointed Geithner to the NY Fed. Geithner is anti-Social Security.

That is most likely because Geithner wants to give our Social Security money to Wall Street to gamble with and to get commissions on. Our 401(K) system is a cruel joke. Now they want to do to our Social Security money what they did with our 401(K) money.

I say "No. No. and again No." Don't let Wall Street steal your retirement savings the way they did the 401(K)s of your parents' generation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC