U.S. may act unilaterally vs.Iran-armed Iraq militias...

[rusty fender]

Source: Reuters

U.S. may act unilaterally vs Iran...

Read more: http://news.yahoo,com/u-may-act-unilaterally-vs-iran-armed-iraq-11503071.html

---

Are we going to attack Iran?

[ixion]

1. So I wonder: How many countries do we have to illegally invade before the world

understands that we are an out-of-control superpower hell-bent on world domination?

[Nihil]

18. The world already understands.

The decision under consideration is "Which method to use to stop
the US that will cause the least pain to everyone else?"

[Autumn]

2. No, Hillary was the one who was supposed to

attack Iran. She's a war monger you know. If there is an adult in the White House he just might check the pocket book before we go into another little action.

[Liberalynn]

3. Oh goodly another war

cause the ones we have going are simply not enough. :sarcasm:

Who the hell made up the saying "well it can't get any worse." It can and it will get worse.

I am begining to believe it can never get better.

[Autumn]

4. Wars are just like kittens one is just not enough.

Come on admit it, it's so much fun.















:sarcasm:
Unless you are the one killing or being killed.

[Liberalynn]

9. or it is a family member or friend being killed

[Tempest]

5. Your link is broken

Corrected:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/u-may-act-unilaterally-vs-iran-armed-iraq-115013071.html

[pmorlan1]

7. Thanks for the new link

Thanks for the new link.

[pmorlan1]

6. The link doesn't work?

I couldn't access this story with your link?

[Hell Hath No Fury]

8. Oh fer fuck's sake....

:banghead:

[Citizen Worker]

10. According to General Wesley Clark he was told there are seven nations slated for attack. Iraq,

Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. The MICC is currently operating in all but Lebanon and Iran.

[jaxx]

11. Another hair on fire headline

This ought to be good for a page or two of angst.

[Tiggeroshii]

12. Here's a good link...

http://news.yahoo.com/u-may-act-unilaterally-vs-iran-armed-iraq-115013071.html

(on edit): in case someone comes to this before they clicked on the link that was posted long before mine was... =)

[creeksneakers2]

13. The link makes a big difference

Panetta isn't suggesting attacking Iran. He's suggesting attacking militias in Iraq that he says are armed by Iran and attacking US troops. The US has been in a non-combat stance, but, until we leave, if we are shot at we should shoot back. That's all Panetta is saying. So many jumped to conclusions when there wasn't even a working link.

[Kolesar]

14. ^ what he said...eom

[Adsos Letter]

15. Well said. n/t

[bahrbearian]

16. Invading Iraq helped get Chimpy reselected,

So now we have an election coming up, what to do, what to do.

[lsewpershad]

17. And we thought

North Korea or Pakistan even the muslims will be the cause of the next world war? America seems to thrive on war.