Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anonymous shares 90,000 military email addresses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 04:44 PM
Original message
Anonymous shares 90,000 military email addresses
Source: MSNBC

Hacking group Anonymous said Monday it infiltrated a server belonging to military consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton and made available approximately 90,000 military email addresses online.

The hack was the second in the past week to target major companies doing business with the federal government. Late last week, Anonymous shared databases and emails it said it obtained by hacking the website of IRC Federal, a company that contracts with federal government agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Department of Defense, for information management services.

"In this line of work, you'd expect them (to have a) state-of-the-art battleship, right? Well you may be as surprised as we were when we found their vessel being a puny wooden barge," Anonymous said on The Pirate Bay file-sharing website. "We infiltrated a server on their network that basically had no security measures in place."

A Booz Allen spokesman contacted by msnbc.com declined to comment, steering a reporter to the company's Twitter account, where the company posted this: "As part of @BoozAllen security policy, we generally do not comment on specific threats or actions taken against our systems." ...

Read more: http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/11/7061036-anonymous-shares-90000-military-email-addresses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Murdoch and Anonymous
Interesting that stories about them are back to back. Both assholes IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. By attacking individual citizens
they are no better then the people they claim to hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Citizens don't wear uniforms. Targets do.
One of the laws of war and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Disgusting
So some private and his family having their family photos and private correspondence hacked is okay with you? Seriously, go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Join the killing force, live with it,.
Killers don't get a free pass.

Don't want it? Don't be a killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. ALL institutions are composed of "individual citizens...."
Your logic suggests that no institutions should ever be criticized or fought, because what about the feelings of all those good folks who work hard to bring you fascism, racism, failed economic policies, and so on, including the good folks who kill innocent people by the hundreds of thousands to make a foreign policy point.

The military is a national institution, not a rabble of good citzens. It is used for national purposes, and the REST of us citizens have both a stake in how it conducts itself and a responsibility to point out injustices when it conducts itself badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm all in favor of embarassing Booz Allen Hamilton, but not compromising our troops. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GillesDeleuze Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. pentagon /= troops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wouldn't assume that this information would compromise our troops
It may just be email addresses of military personnel involved in defense contracting. The article isn't clear on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Never mind
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 05:14 PM by JonLP24
I was wrong about something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Our troops?
Anonymous is global. Which troops are "ours"?

(Oh, and keep in mind that Anonymous and Wikileaks gained fame by not "protecting" the war crimes of US troops, not "protecting" the lies of our state diplomats, not "protecting" the troops of Iran, Egypt, etc.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, aren't they annoying.
What good does that do?

Maybe they should bill the spammers that are the only ones likely to find this info useful.

I'm on a email list for B-A (jobs), but I don't think I'm particularly evil.

I wish I had an email address for anonymous, so I could bill them for annoyance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. How dare they do
this when they could have been doing something more productive like hacking into news corp to grab all their emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is no different that the Murdock hacking. Both should be treated the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Except they didn't do it to sell newspapers
or to influence elections. They did not raise the hopes of a family desperately hoping their daughter was alive and actively interfere with her murder investigation. They did not use the medical condition of a baby born with a life altering condition to get back at the father.

As far as we know, anonymous has not done anything more than cause a lot of embarrassment to governments and companies that want to hide a lot of relevant information from the public.

Whether or not their actions are for the greater good, I do not know, but I do not think they as vile and shameful as those of the Murdoch empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. They are worse.
We know what Murdoch is about. These creeps pretend to be moral superiors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. so their pretentiousness is what makes their actions worse?
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 11:42 PM by pennylane100
Are you saying that crimes committed by people who make no excuses for them are somehow less criminal. The amount of harm caused, judging by those standards, becomes irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Anon = the buzzing of flies.
Have these limp dicks ever conducted an operation or "hack" that was monumental... game changing... significant.. revolutionary...etc?

Seems like they best they can muster is trivial info and annoyances for network admins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. clearing throats, testing waters...I can muster more vague euphemisms, but just stay tuned, k?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. If it only took hackers 4 hours to infiltrate a defense contractors site, shouldn't the question be
Asked whether these contractors are cronies instead of experts? We should worry that a foreign enemy might not have the intent to embarrass but do something more destructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeBillClinton Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. If anonymous can get this data then so can the agents for hostile foreign governments.
The data they are exposing is secondary. They are exposing the lack of effort put into security by companies that should have it as a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. LOL at everyone who compared this to Murdoch
And wikileaks is the same as the NSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
25. these Anonymous clowns should be arrested for treason.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 03:17 AM by provis99
and espionage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. +a Brazilian!
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 05:18 PM by GliderGuider
After all...

Secrets are secrets because they're secret, dammit! If they're not secret any more they won't be secrets. And without secrets where would we be? We can't just walk around telling, like, you know, the truth all the time or something. I mean, what would the world be like if everyone did that?

Wait, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GillesDeleuze Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. you assume US
and i think its heroic. but then again, how you feel about Bradley Manning will probably determine how you feel about anonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. From the torrent site
_ _ __ __
__| || |__ _____ _____/ |_|__| ______ ____ ____ #antisec
\ __ / \__ \ / \ __\ |/ ___// __ \_/ ___\ #anonops
| || | / __ \| | \ | | |\___ \\ ___/\ \___ #laughing
/_ ~~ _\ (____ /___| /__| |__/____ \ \___ \ \___ | #at_your
|_||_| \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ #security

/*******************************************************************************
*** MILITARY MELTDOWN MONDAY: MANGLING BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ***
*******************************************************************************/


Hello Thar!

Today we want to turn our attention to Booz Allen Hamilton, whose core business
is contractual work completed on behalf of the US federal government, foremost
on defense and homeland security matters, and limited engagements of foreign
governments specific to U.S. military assistance programs.

So in this line of work you'd expect them to sail the seven proxseas with a
state- of-the-art battleship, right? Well you may be as surprised as we were
when we found their vessel being a puny wooden barge.

We infiltrated a server on their network that basically had no security
measures in place. We were able to run our own application, which turned out to
be a shell and began plundering some booty. Most shiny is probably a list of
roughly 90,000 military emails and password hashes (md5, non-salted of course!).
We also added the complete sqldump, compressed ~50mb, for a good measure.

We also were able to access their svn, grabbing 4gb of source code. But this
was deemed insignificant and a waste of valuable space, so we merely grabbed
it, and wiped it from their system.

Additionally we found some related datas on different servers we got access to
after finding credentials in the Booz Allen System. We added anything which
could be interesting.

And last but not least we found maps and keys for various other treasure chests
buried on the islands of government agencies, federal contractors and shady
whitehat companies. This material surely will keep our blackhat friends busy
for a while.

A shoutout to all friendly vessels: Always remember, let it flow!
#AntiSec

/*******************************************************************************
*** BONUS ROUND: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON KEY FACTS ***
*******************************************************************************/

For the Lazy we have assembled some facts about Booz Allen. First let's take a
quick look of who these guys are. Some key personnel:

* John Michael "Mike" McConnell, Executive Vice President of Booz Allen and
former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and former Director of
National Intelligence.

* James R. Clapper, Jr., current Director of National Intelligence, former
Director of Defense Intelligence.

* Robert James Woolsey Jr, former Director of National Intelligence and head
of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

* Melissa Hathaway, Current Acting Senior Director for Cyberspace for the
National Security and Homeland Security Councils

Now let's check out what these guys have been doing:

* Questionable involvement in the U.S. government's SWIFT surveillance program;
acting as auditors of a government program, when that contractor is heavily
involved with those same agencies on other contracts. Beyond that, the
implication was also made that Booz Allen may be complicit in a program
(electronic surveillance of SWIFT) that may be deemed illegal by the EC.

http://www.aclu.org/national-security/booz-allens-extensive-ties-government
-raise-more-questions-about-swift-surveillanc

https://www.privacyinternational.org/article/pi-and-aclu-show-swift-auditor-
has-extensive-ties-us-government

* Through investigation of Booz Allen employees, Tim Shorrock of Democracy Now!
asserts that there is a sort of revolving-door conflict of interest between
Booz Allen and the U.S. government, and between multiple other contractors and
the U.S. government in general. Regarding Booz Allen, Shorrock referred to such
people as John M. McConnell, R. James Woolsey, Jr., and James R. Clapper, all
of whom have gone back and forth between government and industry (Booz Allen in
particular), and who may present the appearance that certain government
contractors receive undue or unlawful business from the government, and that
certain government contractors may exert undue or unlawful influence on
government. Shorrock further relates that Booz Allen was a sub-contractor with
two programs at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), called Trailblazer and
Pioneer Groundbreaker.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/12/151224

If you haven't heard about Pioneer Groundbreaker, we recommend the following
Wikipedia article:

"The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy (AKA "Warrantless Wiretapping")
concerns surveillance of persons within the United States during the collection
of foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) as part of
the war on terror."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_Groundbreaker

* A June 28, 2007 Washington Post article related how a U.S. Department of
Homeland Security contract with Booz Allen increased from $2 million to more
than $70 million through two no-bid contracts, one occurring after the DHS's
legal office had advised DHS not to continue the contract until after a review.
A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the contract characterized
it as not well-planned and lacking any measure for assuring valuable work to be
completed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/27/
AR2007062702988.html

* Known as PISCES (Personal Identification Secure Comparison and Evaluation
System), the ΓΓé¼┼ôterrorist interdiction systemΓΓé¼┬¥ matches passengers inbound for the
United States against facial images, fingerprints and biographical information
at airports in high-risk countries. A high-speed data network permits U.S.
authorities to be informed of problems with inbound passengers. Although PISCES
was operational in the months prior to September 11, it apparently failed to
detect any of the terrorists involved in the attack.

Privacy advocates have alleged that the PISCES system is deployed in various
countries that are known for human rights abuses (ie Pakistan and Iraq) and
that facilitating them with an advanced database system capable of storing
biometric details of travelers (often without consent of their own nationals)
poses a danger to human rights activists and government opponents.

http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2002/02march/march02corp3.html

/*******************************************************************************
*** BONUS ROUND TWO: ANONYMOUS INTERESTS ***
*******************************************************************************/

Back in February, as many may recall, Anonymous was challenged by security
company HBGary. One month later - after many grandiose claims and several pages
of dox on "members" of Anonymous which were factually accurate in no way
whatsoever - HBGary and its leadership were busy ruing the day they ever
tangled with Anonymous, and Anonymous was busy toasting another epic trolling.
And there was much rejoicing. However, celebration soon gave way to
fascination, followed by horror, as scandal after scandal radiated from the
company's internal files, scandals spanning the government, corporate and
financial spheres. This was no mere trolling. Anonymous had uncovered a
monster.

One of the more interesting, and sadly overlooked, stories to emerge from
HBGary's email server (a fine example to its customers of how NOT to secure
their own email systems) was a military project - dubbed Operation Metal Gear
by Anonymous for lack of an official title - designed to manipulate social
media. The main aims of the project were two fold: Firstly, to allow a lone
operator to control multiple false virtual identities, or "sockpuppets". This
would allow them to infiltrate discussions groups, online polls, activist
forums, etc and attempt to influence discussions or paint a false
representation of public opinion using the highly sophisticated sockpuppet
software. The second aspect of the project was to destroy the concept of online
anonymity, essentially attempting to match various personas and accounts to a
single person through recognition shared of writing styles, timing of online
posts, and other factors. This, again, would be used presumably against any
perceived online opponent or activist.

HBGary Federal was just one of several companies involved in proposing software
solutions for this project. Another company involved was Booz Allen Hamilton.
Anonymous has been investigating them for some time, and has uncovered all
sorts of other shady practices by the company, including potentially illegal
surveillance systems, corruption between company and government officials,
warrantless wiretapping, and several other questionable surveillance projects.
All of this, of course, taking place behind closed doors, free from any public
knowledge or scrutiny.

You would think the words "Expect Us" would have been enough to prevent another
epic security fail, wouldn't you?

Well, you'd be wrong. And thanks to the gross incompetence at Booz Allen
Hamilton probably all military mersonnel of the U.S. will now have to change
their passwords.

Let it flow!


/*******************************************************************************
*** INVOICE ***
*******************************************************************************/

Enclosed is the invoice for our audit of your security systems, as well as the
auditor's conclusion.

4 hours of man power: $40.00
Network auditing: $35.00
Web-app auditing: $35.00
Network infiltration*: $0.00
Password and SQL dumping**: $200.00
Decryption of data***: $0.00
Media and press****: $0.00

Total bill: $310.00

*Price is based on the amount of effort required.
**Price is based on the amount of badly secured data to be dumped, which in
this case was a substantial figure.
***No security in place, no effort for intrusion needed.
****Trolling is our specialty, we provide this service free of charge.

Auditor's closing remarks: Pwned. U mad, bro?

We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We are Antisec.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC