Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cain says Tenn. mosque would spread Islamic law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:12 PM
Original message
Cain says Tenn. mosque would spread Islamic law
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 10:12 PM by sabbat hunter
Source: KSWO-TV

It is another example of why I believe in American laws and American courts," Cain said. "This is just another way to try to gradually sneak Shariah law into our laws, and I absolutely object to that."

Bill Ruark, of Tyler, Texas, said he decided to attend the rally after hearing Cain on the radio earlier in the day in Nashville, where Ruark's son is recording a country music video.

"He wants to define who are our enemies right now, and who are our allies," he said. "Morally, he's not afraid to say he's a Christian. He's not trying to force it down people's throats, and I appreciate that. And he's not afraid to say who he is."



Read more: http://www.kswo.com/story/15084945/cain-says-tenn-mosque-would-spread-extremism



and one person at the rally said that she knows that she will be supporting a republican in the fall and not Barack Hussein Obama.

I wonder if that woman still believes that he was born in Kenya and is a secret Muslim.

:facepalm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know the sad thing about Cain?
He still does not realize that the only reason he's in the race, is because he's black and the Repuke actually think people voted for Obama because he was black. Those same people think that those people will vote for Cain for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Some people did vote for Obama because he's African American, but
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 03:10 AM by No Elephants
probably more voted for both Hillary and McCain because they were white.

I remember one of the members of the View panel, Sherry, going back and forth. She is a Christian fundamentalist and the mother of a developmentally-challenged son, so she identified greatly with Palin and seemed inclined toward her early on. However, in the end, she supported Obama because she did wanted her son to know that an African American could be President of the United States.

I'd be very surprised if she were the only African American who had that thought or a similar one.
However, people who may have voted for Obama because of his skin color are a small minority compared with the group that would not vote for Jesus if they ever thought about the reality that he wasn't the blue-eyed, dirty blond white guy whose likeness hung in Sunday School class (mine, anyway).

Luckily for Candidate Jesus, and unfortunately for everyone else, thinking tends not to be the strong suit of racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheapdate Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Screw Herman Cain.
The members of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro are US citizens. Cain needs to STFU and reflect on what the 1st amendment means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cain is a hatemonger who is going to get someone killed if he keeps
spouting this kind of propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cain
Alan Keyes Part Deux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is just weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wonder how many sources of Canon Law there are in Tenn.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 03:12 AM by Downwinder
Does Cain object to them, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Cain and other haters of any mention of foreign law just do not get it.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 03:56 AM by No Elephants
No U.S. court has ever APPLIED the law of a foreign nation or religious law (as opposed to maybe just looking at it to see what it says) and, if it obeys the Constitution, never will.

Sorry, but explaining why would take more time than I am willing to spend without getting paid or otherwise compensated, so either trust me or do your own research on it, or just wrongly disbelieve me.

So, God forbid we look at anything outside our own borders to see what it says. If it worked for the Founders, it should work for us. Oh, wait, the Founders were as stupid as Republicans. They did look.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Be careful about sweeping generalizations.
http://shariahinamericancourts.com/

"if it obeys the Constitution, never will."... that's a lot of faith in US courts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I made no sweeping generalization. I made a carefully qualified statement and that
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 05:02 AM by No Elephants
reality seems to have escaped you.

BTW, what part of "if" did you not understand?

Edited to change "do" to "did."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. "No U.S. court has ever APPLIED"
That would be the sweeping generalization.

Since you seem to parse words with an exactitude that rivals my own, I would suggest the following word formulation:
"No U.S. court has ever APPLIED Sharia as the sole reason for their decision, and had that decision maintained in higher courts"

... and "if" they did, it would be struck down, but that's still A US court, negating the premise that "No" (not one), "has ever" (in the last 200+ years) "APPLIED".

If for example, I said that "No U.S. court has ever APPLIED" Levitical law, I think I should be called on making such a sweeping statement, because in the billions of cases on record, I'm sure some podunk judge tried to use the bible as an authority... and was rapidly over-turned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. P.S, Google your source and it's PNAC memo signing founder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ah, a messenger attack.
Let me know how that works out.

I got there via the SPLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If the messanger came to the door with
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 12:58 PM by buckrogers1965
"Hey, I just causes this problem for you." Then you are correct in blaming them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Just so you know the organization behind the link you posted...
Center for Security Policy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Security_Policy

The Center for Security Policy (CSP) is a Washington, D.C. think tank that focuses on national security issues. The Center was founded in 1988 by Frank Gaffney, Jr.. The CSP advocates neoconservative and policies based on a philosophy of "Peace through Strength," which "is not a slogan for military might but a belief that America's national power must be preserved and properly used for it holds a unique global role in maintaining peace and stability.

...it is a member organization of the Cooler Heads Coalition which seeks to "dispel the myths of global warming by exposing flawed scientific, economic, and risk analysis.

The Center sponsors "Family Security Matters." On August 3, 2007, Family Security Matters published an opinion piece by Philip Atkinson, which advocated for making George W. Bush president for life, because "the inadequacy of Democracy, rule by the majority, is undeniable." Furthermore, after giving Atkinson's interpretation of Julius Caesar's treatment of Gaul, the article called for emptying Iraq of its Arabs...

The progressive public policy research and advocacy organization Center for American Progress reported in a blog post, quoting from Glenn Greenwald that the registration of the Coalition to Honor Ground Zero’s website to Center for Security Policy indicated that defense contractors and deep-pocketed conservative donors were bankrolling the mosque opposition.

The Center for Security Policy has also produced a Web ad opposing the mosque for the ground zero coalition, had a $4 million budget in 2008 (the last year for which it has filed tax returns).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Are these people insane?
Isn't ranting about sharia law taking over America about on the same par as saying that the Jews control the media and the banks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You mean they don't??
:sarcasm: Like Muslims or Sharia Law would have a snowball's chance in hell of getting any kind of foothold in Tennesee (Sorry DU Tennesee People, just talking about the radical Christian right).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. oops, sorry, misread the OP
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 01:01 PM by closeupready
self-delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yet the Authoritarians have no quarrel with Levitical law in the US.
Hell, no, they probably get stiffys over the idea of stoning "THOSE" people to death. Damned apostates, serves 'em right if they won't come to church an' learn about Jeebus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. "I'm a wacko; he's a wacko; she's a wacko; we're all wacko! Wouldn't you like to be a wacko too?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC