Anonymous To Build Its Own Social Network Called AnonPlus

[cory777]

Source: Mashable

Hacker collective Anonymous is preparing to launch its own social network called AnonPlus. The move comes after Google banned Anonymous's Google+ account called "Your Anon News" due to a violation of its community standards.

Details about the project are scarce. Currently, AnonPlus.com is merely a splash page, containing a message that explains the group's motives behind the project. "Welcome to the Revolution," it says, "a new social network where there is no fear...of censorship...of blackout...nor of holding back".

Another message on the site explains that the project is for "all people not just anonymous," adding that the actual site will go up soon but it will not happen overnight.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/anonymous-build-own-social-network-called-anonplus-102939059.html

---

Uncensored Activist News http://activistnews.blogspot.com/

[MineralMan]

1. Oh, goodie! A social network for script kiddies who write

in txt spch and use lots of naughty words and stuff. I can hardly wait to sign up.

[closeupready]

11. Yup. LOL

nt

[CJCRANE]

2. I was expecting an Onion article.

How about AnonDating, that would be cool!

[MineralMan]

3. That's not going to work out too well. It'll be 200 geeky guys

with pale skin and carpal tunnel syndrome, and who are sort of scared of women, for every 2 women on the site. That proportion won't work out so well, I'm thinking.

[Wait Wut]

5. But, they're accepting "all people".

I'm joinin', you betcha!!! I've gotten bored trolling RW sites! "No censorship"? Irresistible. :evilgrin:

[MineralMan]

9. I predict instant popularity.

[bitchkitty]

7. It will work for women

who love geeky guys with pale skin and carpal tunnel syndrome!

[MineralMan]

8. Well, that's true enough.

Have a ball! :hug:

[Wait Wut]

4. Just priceless.

Apparently, it gets lonely sitting in your basement, especially when FB keeps deleting your profile.

[tinrobot]

6. A social network is a great way to blow one's anonymity.

Seriously, the more people reveal about themselves in a social network, the more information you have to identify them.

[matt819]

10. Names could be a problem

They'll all have to be called Anon, since any further descriptors would be, well, not anonymous.

[Edweird]

12. Um, there's already a social network for anon. "Anon Plus"? Srsly?