Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cameron widens media inquiry (THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:43 AM
Original message
Cameron widens media inquiry (THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE)
Source: AP

LONDON (AP) - UK Prime Minister David Cameron says the newspaper inquiry will widen to take in different types of information-related crimes and other media - such as broadcasters.

He told lawmakers Wednesday it will also investigate all forms of information-related crimes, such as phone hacking and hacking into e-mail accounts.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

LONDON (AP) - British Prime Minister David Cameron defended his former communications chief Andy Coulson before an emergency session of Parliament on Wednesday, saying he believes that people are innocent until proven guilty.

Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20110720/D9OJBOS02.html




Committee members react after a protestor, left checked shirt , named on Twitter as Jonnie Marbles, tries to throw a paper plate covered in shaving foam over Rupert Murdoch as he gave evidence to a House of Commons Committee in London, Tuesday July 19, 2011, on the News of the World phone hacking scandal.(AP Photo/pa)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't Murdoch's wife star in "Bad Santa"? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Will certainly now widen to all of our newspapers.
The Mirror, who've made the sole , currently unsubstantiated, allegation re. 9/11, has already been mentioned.

Off topic but probably of interest to you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wapping_dispute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Cameron widens media inquiry"
Something they need to do to find out that Rupetile knew NOTHINK...NOTHINK and to clear the Rupetile of all charges?

"Nothink to see there!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Main benifciary of yesterday's hearing appears to be James
James Murdoch, appointed deputy chief operating officer of News Corp. (NWSA) in March, took control at a three-hour hearing on phone-hacking in a performance that may increase his chances of running the media company.

The 38-year-old repeatedly interrupted U.K. lawmakers yesterday when they posed questions to his 80-year-old father, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rupert Murdoch, about the company’s internal investigations and whether the executives had knowledge of phone-hacking and payments to police for information by employees at the News of the World tabloid.

“Clearly his father was delegating to him and obviously trusts him to take forward the management of the company,” said Claire Enders, founder and CEO of media researcher Enders Analysis in London, whose clients include the U.K. government.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-19/james-murdoch-boosts-chances-of-news-corp-top-job-at-phone-hack-hearing.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick and Rec to the top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is what the current Prime Minister was aware of about
the media spokes person he hired.... He worked for an organization that caused great harm/pain to former P.M Brown... Read this and keep this in mind when you hear Prime Minister David Cameron say that his hiring of former Murdock thug was a mistake if he discovers he was lied to... Reguardless if Camerion discovers in hindsight he was lied to..... He knew as did all of England that Murdocks thugs were responsible for releasing this info.:


"Brown's spokeswoman said: "The family has been shocked by the level of criminality and the unethical means by which personal details have been obtained. The matter is in police hands."

When their first child, Jennifer, was born on 28 December 2001, a small group of specialist doctors and nurses was aware that she had suffered a brain haemorrhage and was dying. By some means which has not been discovered, this highly sensitive information was obtained by news organisations, who published it over the weekend before Jennifer died, on Monday 6 January 2002.

In 2003, Devon and Cornwall police discovered that one of their junior officers was providing information from the police national computer to a network of private investigators. The Guardian has established that one of these investigators, Glen Lawson of Abbey Investigations in Newcastle upon Tyne, used this contact to commission a search of police records for information about Brown on 16 November 2000. Lawson also commissioned searches related to two other Labour MPs, Nick Brown and Martin Salter."http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/11/phone-hacking-news-international-gordon-brown

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. yeah, but can the police be trusted?
some of them were receiving payoffs... what makes anyone think there are some still being bribed by Murdoch that no one has discovered yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. flooding the zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabo_tabby Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. One can only hope...
Everything Morloch touches is corrupt, illegal and unjust. I wasn't surprised that the pig who owns the Faux-News and WSJ tried to pull this crap.

The only shame is that Morloch closed up only the <I>NOTW</I>. He should have been made to close up Faux and WSJ as well. It's like the guy at LA <I>Times</I> said - those two criminal organizations don't deserve 1A.

gvi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Makes me wonder whether Democratic headquarters were hacked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. The inclusion of 'broadcasters' seems to be basically pandering to the Right's hatred of the BBC
Which they regard as left-wing (simply because it's not actively biased to the right); and also distrust because it is publicly funded.

One of the current right-wing arguments is that yes, Murdoch may have got too powerful but the BBC is even more powerful and is poisoning our country with its evil left-wing propaganda, etc.

Certainly the investigation should and will be including newspapers not part of the Murdoch empire; e.g. the Mail and the Mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. The inclusion of 'broadcasters' seems to be basically pandering to the Right's hatred of the BBC
Which they regard as left-wing (simply because it's not actively biased to the right); and also distrust because it is publicly funded.

One of the current right-wing arguments is that yes, Murdoch may have got too powerful but the BBC is even more powerful and is poisoning our country with its evil left-wing propaganda, etc.

Certainly the investigation should and will be including newspapers not part of the Murdoch empire; e.g. the Mail and the Mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC