Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beijing develops pulse weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
July16th-20th Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 04:13 AM
Original message
Beijing develops pulse weapons
Source: Washington Times

China's military is developing electromagnetic pulse weapons that Beijing plans to use against U.S. aircraft carriers in any future conflict over Taiwan, according to an intelligence report made public on Thursday.

Portions of a National Ground Intelligence Center study on the lethal effects of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and high-powered microwave (HPM) weapons revealed that the arms are part of China’s so-called “assassin’s mace” arsenal - weapons that allow a technologically inferior China to defeat U.S. military forces.

EMP weapons mimic the gamma-ray pulse caused by a nuclear blast that knocks out all electronics, including computers and automobiles, over wide areas. The phenomenon was discovered in 1962 after an aboveground nuclear test in the Pacific disabled electronics in Hawaii.

The declassified intelligence report, obtained by the private National Security Archive, provides details on China’s EMP weapons and plans for their use. Annual Pentagon reports on China's military in the past made only passing references to the arms.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jul/21/beijing-develops-radiation-weapons/



Fuck Iraq. Fuck Afghanistan. This is the national security issue we OUGHT be attending to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cleaver and how are they going to generate this pulse and
how are they going to protect their electronics from it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Two ways I know to generate the power for the pulse:
Large-scale capacitor banks (we're talking Gigawatts to Terawatts here) more likely used for land-based weapons. The other way would be portable, using something called a "homopolar generator." Basically, it's a disc-motor where the kinetic energy is utilized when stopped abruptly, causing the kind of electic pulse necessary to create a NNEMP (Non-Nuclear Electro-Magnetic Pulse)

Protection comes in the form of a Faraday Shield. Our military has been doing this kind of thing for decades. They have probably honed the technique to a science by now, beyond the simple Faraday cages used by experimenters and industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. There's a third method that works better
It involves using explosives to move a coil and magnetic field relative to each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I remember readeing that
but couldn't remember what it was called, so I left it to someone else to remember :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. we have been working on this stuff too
infact weve been working on defensive pulse weapons ('force fields'/ or 'shields' if your into star trek )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you mean 'national' or 'imperial' security? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't the US have their own? In addition to HAARP?
2012... myth or fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippydude Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sandia labs
in Albuquerque have been working on this for years... in semi plain site..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. The rightwing Moonie Times and Bill Gertz


Do you know this is the same guy that said Russian Special Forces moved
Saddam's weapons of mass destruction out of Iraq into Syria ?

You need better news sources than this proven liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The reporter is a proven liar and a war monger
His stories and the paper have no credibility. .... unrecorded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You doubt China is Stealing Islands from the Philippines $ Vietnam for OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Stealing" is a strong word
They'd probably call it "developing."

Michael Klare has written some nice works on oil, water, and minerals' shortages. The Oceans, to some extent, are up for grabs.

And WTF are we doing in Iraq, or Afghanistan, right? Where is the next source of easily obtainable oil? The Caspian Sea Region, which happens to be just to the North of the crap-hole we find ourselves engaged in now. So it's really hard to call them out on trying to find oil in their waters, when we're halfway across the world, pretending we're doing something good, but in fact just putting our oil companies in charge of Iraq's oil, and sapping away 90 percent of the profits from a devastated country that needs the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm not suggesting the "Pot and the Kettle" are not both black
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 08:10 AM by FreakinDJ
China had ZERO interest in the islands off the Philippines until oil was found there and the Philippine signed contracts to develop the site.

And it is just by coincidence China decided to build 2 aircraft carriers too

Funny - when we signed the Free Trade agreement with China allowing them to charge a 20% tariff to America's 2% tariff, the reasoning cited was because China was a developing country. Developing Country alright - except now they are using the proceeds from those lopsided trade deals to finance land grabs from trully impovershed countries like the Philippines.

I only follow news and events from the area because I have lived and worked in the Philippines, Korea, and Tokyo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. And you give credence the Washington Times as a source
you better think again. The reporter works for the Heritage foundation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. When I stay at our house in Cebu Philippines, I watch the local news
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 08:15 AM by FreakinDJ
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/06/16/11/china-sends-out-patrol-ship-amid-territorial-disputes

You should be more concerned why the American National News Media has blacked out this story

But I will say this - this country would be a LOT better off if more people spent a little time out side the country and learned what it is like in the rest of the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. The story is about Pulse weapons
claimed by the reporter ... your story is something else.
which I don't deny on the China sea .




Plus I do live outside of the US

The Moonie Times for god's sake..... is like WND.
The reporter is a proven liar.

Its about this story not your story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Agreed
I put it together with a story I read the other day about China commissioning a couple of Air Craft Carriers.

For the record China has meddled in Philippine affairs for a very long time, even funding the NPA (New People's Army). It originally was a bunch of college students protesting Marco's refusal to step down. When Reagan was shaking hands with Marcos, he was having his troops use machine guns to disperse the protesters in Cebu. Of course American Media reported the "Use of Water Cannons"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. The Moonie Times is NOT like the WND.
The WND is entertaining. I used to buy it once in a while just for fun.

Is it still being published? I haven't seen it in stores lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. The only logical reason
I could ever come up with for the Vietnam war was control of the South China Sea. That control necessitated a naval base at Cam Ranh Bay to compliment the one at Subic Bay in the Philippines. Cam Rahn Bay was also necessary to establish a permanent land presence on the Asian Mainland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Why - at the time we had 2 Major Bases in the Philippines
had Ronald Reagan not befriended Marcos so much during the masive demonstrations in the Philippines protesting Marshal Law, Corruption, and Marcos Cronies in every level of Philippine Government - we would still have those Bases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. The fall of South Vietnam
would have opened Cam Rahn Bay to a strategically unacceptable Soviet naval presence, which is what eventually happened. At that time the presence of a Soviet fleet challenged US hegemony in the region. Today US naval vessels have access to Cam Rahn and to Haiphong to counter growing Chinese territorial claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Is there a new round of military appropriations bills coming up?
This propaganda crap about the "military" capabilities of other countries always come up when our military is about to ask for more money from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Got that "Warm Fuzzy" over Free Trade now
Glad to know your dollars went to finance this shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hand held
for use against effing drones.

Cost about $100 - $150 and you got a sale.
(I'll save up)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bob Dole's little blue pills develops pulse weapons...
And the GOPers want to use them on anyone who will hold still for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babydollhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. it probably won't even work.
It might work a few times and then break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Lethal effects of electromagnetic pulse"?
bahahahahaahaaaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Tell that to the goats and the Russian lab tech...
It can fry the nervous system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Through deck and hull plates?
At sea? From land? lol.

Potentially lethal to electronics I suppose, but we (especially the navy) go to great lengths to shield such equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. They've been at this for some time.
The US has nothing to worry about as long as it doesn't interfere in China's affairs and launch aggression. This is not the old cold war. EMP weapons has a distinctly defensive capability. Aggressors wouldn't like them because it disables their ability to launch aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. Destroying a US aircraft carrier is a quick way to get a few major military bases flattened
Nuclear or otherwise, the US counter-attack would not be a pretty sight to behold if you live on the Asian continent. An EMP weapon does fuck-all against a stealth bomber or ICBM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. We couldn't win a war in Asia, certainly not against China.
We can barely hold our own in Afghanistan against an enemy that has no army, air force or navy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Not without the use of nuclear weapons.
When the Chinese entered battle in the Korean War, the generals on the ground were screaming to use nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I also remember a couple of years ago, maybe five that a Chinese
sub surfaced in the middle of one of our fleets that where on maneuvers or during war games or some such thing. Took us completely by surprise.

We did not know it was there until it surfaced. Heck of a way to deliver a pulse weapon. Maybe a test run?

I still like to think we would be sane enough not to start a nuclear war. Then again there are people that think one side or the other wins a conventional war. No one wins a war, period. Some one may come out on top, but no one wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Why Would China Attack What They Already Own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. I wish people would work on pulse crops instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_(legume)

It would be so much healthier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC