Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (07/28/2011)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 07:36 AM
Original message
Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report (07/28/2011)
Source: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WEEKLY CLAIMS REPORT

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED DATA

In the week ending July 23, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 398,000, a decrease of 24,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 422,000. The 4-week moving average was 413,750, a decrease of 8,500 from the previous week's revised average of 422,250.

The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.9 percent for the week ending July 16, a 0.1 percentage point decrease from the prior week's revised rate of 3.0 percent.

The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending July 16 was 3,703,000, a decrease of 17,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 3,720,000. The 4-week moving average was 3,721,000, a decrease of 5,250 from the preceding week's revised average of 3,726,250.

Read more: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/eta20111119.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. A little better than expected, which is nice...
...but still way too high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can't these "experts" ever get it right?!
I could have told them that the expected number of 415K was not going to be exactly right!










(Just a little snark aimed at the armchair economists who proclaim themselves experts when there is an unexpectedly high unemployment claims number).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Applications for unemployment aid drop below 400K
Source: Associated Press

Applications for unemployment aid drop below 400K

By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER
AP Economics Writer



WASHINGTON (AP) -- The number of people seeking unemployment benefits dropped last week to the lowest level since early April, a sign the job market may be healing after a recent slump.

The Labor Department said Thursday that weekly applications fell 24,000 to a seasonally adjusted 398,000. That's the first time applications have fallen below 400,000 in 16 weeks.

The four-week average, a less volatile measure, dropped to 413,750, the lowest since the week of April 23.

Applications had fallen in February to 375,000, a level that signals healthy job growth. But they then surged to an eight-month high of 478,000 in April and have declined only slowly since then.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_UNEMPLOYMENT_BENEFITS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-07-28-08-45-56



Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_UNEMPLOYMENT_BENEFITS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-07-28-08-45-56



Hopeful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Last week IIRDC we got 13 threads by noon on the increase. Let's see how many we get on a drop.
My prediction is as ever that doom sells on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Something tells me you didn't read the full article. The 'doom' is spelled out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. but bigger-numbered doom is more appealing here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. of course it will drop
When there are fewer and fewer jobs, there are fewer people to fire and lay off from those jobs. And so there are fewer unemployment claims and a rise in "discouraged workers"---workers who can no longer apply nor seek unemployment but still do not have a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoralme Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Very imaginative. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. new applications and discouraged workers are irrelevant to ach other
unless you believe that people are too discouraged to spend a few minutes online to get a few hundred dollars a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Discouraged workers is a technical term and different from what you're saying
those not in the labor force who want and are available for a job and who have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months (or since the end of their last job if they held one within the past 12 months), but are not currently looking, because they believe there are no jobs available or there are none for which they would qualify. (Specifically, the main reason identified by discouraged workers for not recently looking for work is one of the following: believes no work available in line of work or area; could not find any work; lacks necessary schooling,training, skills, or experience; employers think too young or too old; or other types of discrimination.)
source: Current Population Survey Technical Paper 66, page 5-5

Discouragement as a concept has nothing to do with UI claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. The labor force is still growing, as is the job market


That's labor force total numbers, current. Of course things could be better, but it is still trending upward. It does make one wonder, however, what we might have had if congress had allowed a more comprehensive stimulus, or any of the jobs programs that the president and democrats pushed for in '10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Happy Days are here again, now if only I could get something besides a McJob. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC