Pentagon Plans Test of Atmospheric Dispersion (DoD)

[ConcernedCanuk]

.
.
.

Are they expecting something? A warning maybe? - hmmm

Pentagon Plans Test of Atmospheric Dispersion
April 19, 2004

The Department of Defense announced today that an atmospheric dispersion survey will be held in and around the Pentagon from April 19 to May 15, 2004. The survey will advance knowledge about the weather conditions and movement of simulated airborne contaminants around and inside the Pentagon. The resulting data will be used to improve, refine and verify a computer model that simulates the atmospheric transport of potential contaminants around the Pentagon.


Knowledge gained about the airflow around the Pentagon, and the associated transport of gases and their infiltration into the building, will allow the development of improved systems for protecting other Department of Defense facilities.

/snip/

The tracer testing protocol being followed is standard and has been used in other locations. The protocol for the Pentagon exercise has been reviewed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.


All sensors will be clearly marked as part of the Pentagon Shield exercise and should not be touched or moved.

http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2004/nr20040419-0624.html
_________________________________________________________________

I wonder, is there a "home kit" available for this?

Is this some sort of "heads up" ?

disturbing . . .

[loudsue]

1. I wish these guys would leave Mother Nature the hell alone!!

I am staying near a military base in Georgia right now, and I've got the headache from HELL! I'm wondering :tinfoilhat: if this little "test" has something to do with it.

:kick:

[demdave]

12. in and around the Pentagon from April 19 to May 15, 2004

I think you are safe in GEORGIA. :crazy:

[bobthedrummer]

2. Is the USAF behind this? They have yet to answer the questions of the

people about their behavior and response to the 9-11 attacks-it is LIHOP imo.

And, for what it's worth-what are those chemtrails all about, those go back to the President Clinton era, the late 1990's.

Chemtrails were mentioned in the original language of The Space Preservation Act of 2001 HR2977, but all "exotic weapons" references were dropped from the revision HR3616 The Space Preservation Act of 2002 including mind control.
http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

USAF has a lot to explain to the people it didn't protect.

[Desertrose]

4. my first thought too...chemtrails

I'd sure like to know what they are really all about...we get it heavy here in the SW...

peace
DR

[bobthedrummer]

5. There is a NOAA picture of them being formed above Green Bay

taken in October 1998. There is silence about them, even though most people that look into the skies every now and then notice them.

I lost the link to that NOAA pic, but it is quite real.

[Just Me]

7. Geez, I've seen those buggars, too,...

,...in western VA,...

Wish I knew more about all that.

[maggrwaggr]

10. uh ... I think they're produced by these things called "jetliners"

see, they make this stuff called "exhaust" which freezes in the high cold levels of the stratosphere.

You might want to try flying on one sometime

[54anickel]

3. Watch for a run up in the cost of duct tape and plastic screening again.

[Gin]

6. I asked the question...are chemtrails real...on DU..and was told it

is not true..it's tin foil time..yada yada...I see them crisscrossing the sky here in va beach...and they blend to make a cloud...I wonder why they don't dissipate.

[54anickel]

8. It's an interesting subject. Kucinich believed in them. I put nothing

past our DoD. I've been hit with the tin foil rhetoric on the HAARP stuff in the past as well.

[maggrwaggr]

9. gee, what kind of radioactive shit are they gonna disperse

in order to detect it?

sounds like one of those cardiovascular tests where they squirt radioactive liquid into you

[demdave]

11. The tracer gas being used is sulfur hexafluoride, SF6.

Does anyone ever read the articles?

[ConcernedCanuk]

13. LOL - "Does anyone ever read the articles?" - that's rhetorical, right?

.
.
.

:thumbsup: