Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PTC: Indecency Regs Not Unfair Broadcast Restriction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:41 PM
Original message
PTC: Indecency Regs Not Unfair Broadcast Restriction
Source: Broadcasting & Cable

It is not unfair for the government to restrict what broadcasters can air during the daytime, and their argument that they are at a competitive disadvantage versus unregulated cable content comes despite the fact that they own "significant" portions of that cable content.

That was the Parents Television Council's take on the appeals court smackdown of the FCC's indecency decision against swearing in a Fox awards show, which is being reviewed by the Supreme Court at the FCC and Justice's request.

In an amicus petition in support of the government and its regulatory regime Wednesday, PTC said the decisions were neither an affront to expression or a muzzle on speech.

"Instead," they said, "it is about whether is to have any continuing vitality in affecting what the broadcasters can send into America's homes, or whether, as respondents seem to argue, the indecency statute is a polite fiction that can be safely ignored." PTC, not surprisingly, wants the Supreme Court to reverse the Second Circuit and uphold the constitutionality of the FCC's policy, which the FCC defended in its brief with the court last week.

Read more: http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/473858-PTC_Indecency_Regs_Not_Unfair_Broadcast_Restriction.php



The awards show in question is the 2002 Billboard Music Awards where Nicole Richie used two obscene words in 5 seconds). See more info at "" by USA Today, Oct. 2007. And bleeping or obscuring cuss words on 6AM-10PM is a reasonable compromise when it comes to pre-recorded/produced programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course not. Only the Fairness Doctrine was an unfair broadcasting restriction.
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 04:27 AM by No Elephants
Thank heavens the Reagan administration suspended enforcement and the Obama administration finished it off once and for all.

Otherwise, Democratic candidates may have had a slightly less uneven playing field in the Republican corporate media. What is it now, all of four owners for most print and broadcast media, or is it five?

Anyhoo, we are rid of that evil possiblity. Whew.

Republicans, however, do love them restrictions like this one, so, of course, it should be enshrined somewhere. Maybe even bronzed. No, forget bronzed. Use gold. Republicans love that, too.

While we're at it, let's just make them a gold key to the country and give it to them. Get it over with. This handing them everything a bit at a time has become tedious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. You want "fairness"? Bring back the "Fairness Doctrine". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC