Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia Faces Recession for Two Years With $50 Oil, IMF Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bloomington-lib Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 07:46 AM
Original message
Russia Faces Recession for Two Years With $50 Oil, IMF Says
Source: bloomberg

Russia’s economy would slip into recession for one to two years if oil prices fall to $50 a barrel next year and stay at that level, according to the International Monetary Fund.

The worst-case scenario “illustrates the continuing vulnerabilities of the Russian economy” because of its dependence on commodity exports, said Odd Per Brekk, the IMF’s senior representative in Moscow.

Russia will grow 4.3 percent this year and 4.1 percent in 2012, less than previously forecast because of a worsening outlook for oil prices, the Washington-based lender said yesterday in a report. In June, the IMF had estimated growth of 4.8 percent and 4.5 percent.

“We expect a continuation of the fairly tentative recovery in the Russian economy combined with fairly high inflation,” Brekk told a round-table today in Moscow, after the forecast cut. “But even with those downward adjustments, we still consider the risks to be on the down side.”

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-21/russia-faces-recession-for-two-years-with-50-oil-imf-says-1-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I give more credit to stagnant oil prices throughout the '80s
as a contributing factor to the decline and collapse of the Soviet Union over anything conservatroids tout as an 'accomplishment' of St. Ronnie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That and Afghanistan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The cost of waging war in Afghanistan
was directly related to depressed oil revenues. I would say the root cause is declining oil revenues, which were definitely exacerbated by a costly war of occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like I have said in the past...
we go to war for oil to support the military's need for oil.

the classic cluster fuck.

the military is the single largest user of fossil fuels in the US, but you will never ever hear that mentioned by any of our illustrious politician's. According to them, we the people are the only ones at fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. + 1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Afghanistan broke Russia and it is doing the same to the US
Raygun had nothing to do with it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep
And the Soviet Union generated revenues from the export of oil, which throughout the '80s wasn't enough to cover the cost of war in Afghanistan. Imagine the drain upon the US economy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julian09 Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, who expects oil prices to sink to $50 ? unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I know, that was the non-starter for me.
50 bucks a barrel?

the only way it becomes 50 bucks a barrel is when no one needs it anymore and the 50 bucks will only be a sign post on it's way to zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Funny stuff!
> he worst-case scenario “illustrates the continuing vulnerabilities of the Russian economy” because of its dependence on commodity exports,

In contrast, the USA economy is dependent on exporting pieces of paper labeled "Treasury Notes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. The IMF has a lousy track record for prediction. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC