Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exclusive: Murdoch execs told of hacking evidence in 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:31 AM
Original message
Exclusive: Murdoch execs told of hacking evidence in 2006
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 08:40 AM by kpete
Source: Independent UK

Exclusive: Murdoch execs told of hacking evidence in 2006
Police warned Rebekah Brooks that hacking was likely to be in wider use
By James Cusick and Cahal Milmo
Thursday, 22 September 2011

Up to a dozen News International executives, including Rebekah Brooks, were told in 2006 that the Metropolitan Police had evidence that more than one News of the World journalist was implicated in the phone-hacking scandal.

New information obtained by The Independent challenges the timetable, as publicly stated by Rupert Murdoch's newspaper group, of when and how it first became aware of the extent of illegality at the now-defunct Sunday tabloid. Senior figures from NI have repeatedly stated to Parliament that the company had no significant evidence until 2008 that illegal voicemail interception went beyond the NOTW's jailed royal editor, Clive Goodman.

The new evidence, which is likely to be central to the investigations into the Murdoch empire, reveals that police informed the company two years earlier that they had uncovered strong "circumstantial evidence" implicating other journalists. A senior police officer held a meeting with Ms Brooks in the weeks after the arrest in August 2006 of Mr Goodman and the private investigator Glenn Mulcaire.

The officer who met Ms Brooks – a former editor of the NOTW who at the time was editing The Sun – told her that detectives sifting through a vast cache of documents seized from Mulcaire's south London home had uncovered evidence that Goodman was not the only individual on the paper involved in criminal activity. Information was disclosed about the nature of that evidence

Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/exclusive-murdoch-execs-told-of-hacking-evidence-in-2006-2358777.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. K and R all Murdoch scandal threads
This is huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Given the "evidence"
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 08:54 AM by dipsydoodle
the only question of importance here is why didn't the police bring charges at that time.

In case it hasn't dawned on anyone here - either the Independent or their police leak will now have to substantiate this at the enquiry which puts the issue the same boat as the issue with the Guardian journalists and their grass. At the enquiry there won't be time to claim human rights issues - could be a straight forward lock up job if they refuse to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. SO the Murdochs, Brooks, et al are craven liars? Least surprising news of 2011.
Horrible human beings, horrible ethics, horrible business practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC