Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Source: NBA Won't Talk Without 50-50 Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:57 PM
Original message
AP Source: NBA Won't Talk Without 50-50 Deal
Source: AP-Excite

By BRIAN MAHONEY

NEW YORK (AP) - The NBA players' association wanted a meeting and said the league would grant one - under one condition.

Just agree first to a 50-50 split of revenues.

Players already rejected that offer once. The league confirmed it wasn't moving beyond that number but wanted to meet about other issues, and it said the union wasn't interested.

All that matters: An on-time start to the NBA season now seems even less likely.

Read more: http://sports.excite.com/news/10072011/v5184.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since the NBA saw fit to move my team to Oklahoma...

...I really don't give a shit if the season ever starts. Ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I haven't watched NBA basketball since the late 80's. A couple
years ago I was listening to The Heard on ESPN radio and Colin named the NBA Hall Of Fame inductees. There was a guy inducted that I had never heard of.

I still love high school and college hoops but not interested in the NBA at all. I'm not as crazy about the NFL like I used to be either.

I watched a little bit of a game a year or so ago and had to ask what the new curved line under the hoop was? I'd like to say I couldn't believe it but I just laughed! Seriously? You can't play defense under the hoop anymore? If they played the NBA championship in my back yard I wouldn't bother to watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "Go Sonics!" (And take the Mariners with you)
50% ain't bad for a wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Supposedly Steve Balmer is trying to get a new franchise for Seattle
...the city kept the rights to the name. So a new team would be the Sonics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. There is a silver lining

First, you're no longer paying to keep the Sonics in town. Seattle residents were getting hosed by the Sonic owners.

Second, Oklahoma City hasn't seen any net benefit from the move. Revenues haven't met expectations and the contract with the city has residents paying to keep the Thunder in town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. If they miss half the season it will still be too long... who cares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Players just need to take the deal at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. why would you take 50% deal rather than negotiate a deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Because they're going to loose out even bigger when...
...all anyone pays attention to is that the season either didn't happen or started way late. Their not going to win this one. It's not a big enough shift to loose the season too and will undoubtedly affect the endorsements of the superstars and the long-term salary of the role players and reserves. It's lose-big lose.

I've read numerous times in the sports pages that no one pays attention to basketball and that only the postseason matters and frankly I find it racist and not-sportsmanlike. Tens of millions of young men and boys follow basketball intensely and the basic dispute of the negotiation at this point is 7% - slightly more than 1/10 of the total involved. A rising tide lifts all boats. The NBA will only suffer severely from a lockout like the 1994-1995 MLB lockout: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994-95_Major_League_Baseball_strike#Post-strike

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. The NBA players received 57% of BRI in the last labor agreement.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-11 08:13 AM by blueclown
In this labor agreement, the owners are demanding they take 50%, which is a significant cutback. This doesn't factor in other issues, such as the elimination of the MLE (Mid Level Exception), which adversely affects the role-players of the league, not the stars or starters.

And I'm in agreement with you about the sentiment here - it is pure racism. I have had it with a few members of DU. That Thugaball comment was the last straw. I'm white, and this type of double standard against the NBAPA is just shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. The Mid-level exception is not being eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. It's not lose-lose

Many U.S. players are going overseas to play and as that market increases it will hurt the NBA owners more.

Nor has there been a drop off in endorsement contracts for NBA players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That's not too say there won't be when...
...they cancel the season.

The overseas market is not and will not be as lucrative as the NBA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thugaball is finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. This racist garbage should lead to a tombstone immediately.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-11 08:08 AM by blueclown
Time and time again, certain factions of DU show they have very little regard for labor unions if they are predominately black. Would this type of garbage vitrol be accepted if we were talking about the SEIU?

We have NBA ownership who is demanding there won't be a season unless the players agree to massive cutbacks in their new labor agreement. I'm guessing if this were the UAW, we'd have hundred of comments, the vast majority of them in support of the UAW. But for whatever reason, and I think I know why, that same support isn't there for the NBA Player's Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Taking guns into locker rooms are they not thugs?
Millionaires Vs Billionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. You are speaking of Gilbert Arenas and Javaris Crittenton.
Yes, you might call them thugs. But those are just two players and they paid the price for that stupidity. But to generalize and call all NBA players thugs is wrong. Many are fine people who do a lot of public service work in their communities and contribute a lot to charity and serve as good role models. There are a lot more thugs working on Wall Street than in the NBA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Stereotyping an entire group of players over two bad apples
Is very progressive of you.

You should be ashamed of your racist filth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Stereotyping an entire group of players is indeed wrong. But unless we can read the poster's mind we
can't know for sure if it's racist or not. How do we know that the poster wouldn't have also called Arenas and Crittenton thugs if they were white? If you look up the term "thugs" you will find that it is a racially neutral term. Yes, it is often used in a racist context but not always. Unless I have more evidence than this I am willing to give the poster the benefit of the doubt and entertain the possibility that it is not racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. He didn't say "thug", he said "thuga"

It was blatantly racial.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Sorry, I haven't heard the term "thuga" before and when I Googled it nothing came up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Gangsta isn't used to describe white criminals

Thuga is blatantly racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. You are over my head with this terminology. So maybe I shouldn't weigh in on it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I'm sure he doesn't think that he is racist.
Nobody thinks that they are. But I think his words speak louder than his own assumptions about himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I don't think it racial. At least I hope it isn't. What it is really about in my opinion
is the perception that NBA players regardless of their race are millionaires. And right now there is a lot of hatred and resentment directed at rich people. Of course the truth is that not all NBA players are millionaires. Some high profile stars are but the minimum salary last season in the NBA was $473,604 for a rookie and $992,680 for a five year veteran. To be guaranteed one million you need to be a six year veteran and many players never even make it that far. In fact, the average length of an NBA player's career is only 4.82 years.

Of course, even $473,604 is a nice comfortable salary, but remember that with short careers most NBA players won't ever make that much again after they retire so they need to make as much as they can while they can. Only a few ex players can move on to lucrative careers in broadcasting and coaching.

Most of us probably remember the recent story about 10 year NBA veteran Ray Williams who is down on his luck and homeless. Yes he probably made some bad financial decisions after his career ended, but the point is that an NBA career isn't always what it's made out to be.

I support the NBA players union and I hope that they aren't forced to give in to the greedy owners. And speaking of millionaires, most of them are multi millionaires if not billionaires.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. You don't think "thug-a" is racial?
If you are for perceptions, then maybe you could get a thinly-veiled niggger-thug reference that's right before your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. He probably doesn't think "gangsta" is racial either

You can give them eyes but they cannot see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Aw, the poor top 1%.
Can't have them suffering, after all, they're "job creators"!

(That goes for the players *and* the owners).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC