Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama to order FDA to help reduce drug shortages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:14 AM
Original message
President Obama to order FDA to help reduce drug shortages
Source: Associated Press

Acting once again ahead of Congress, President Barack Obama is directing the Food and Drug Administration to take steps to reduce drug shortages, an escalating problem that has placed patients at risk and raised the possibility of price gouging.

A White House official said the president planned to sign an executive order Monday instructing the FDA to take action. The order would be the latest in the president's campaign to move on initiatives that do not require congressional approval.

Last year, the FDA reported 178 drug shortages, and the agency says it continues to see an increase in shortages this year. These scarcities tend to affect cancer drugs, anesthetics, drugs used in emergency medicine, and electrolytes needed for intravenous feeding.

Obama also will announce his support for House and Senate legislation that would require drug makers to notify the FDA six months ahead of a potential shortage, the official said. Under current regulations, drug manufactures are only required to notify the FDA if medically necessary drugs are being discontinued. Notification of shortages is strictly voluntary.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h_tjkifWpscYf9xkN4gsMP-abubQ?docId=8183bf8f4113420aa4c922fd4c5f9260
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Notification of shortages is strictly voluntary."
I think that describes the entire US Regulatory System...VOLUNTARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Right. No one wants to distract the job creators from creating all those jobs they've been busy
not creating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. And what exactly is the FDA supposed to do about it?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 05:46 AM by Demeter
Allow dangerous drugs on the market?

Or just maybe, allow importation of safe and effective drugs from Canada and Western Europe?

Why doesn't he sic the Justice department on Pfizer instead, and bust the drug cartel which has been systematically buying up and shutting down the competition?

(read the link...what a load of crap. How can they call this reporting?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. This "executive order" is a PR stunt which does NOTHING to alleviate the problem.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 06:35 AM by Divernan
I quote from the article: "The FDA does not have authority to force drug makers to continue production of a drug."

There is no mention or explanation or detail offered as to how this "executive order" in any manner changes the rules and regulations under which the FDA operates. IF there is ANYTHING the FDA can ALREADY do to "take action", nothing in the Executive Order changes that, and Obama need only have simply ordered the FDA to more aggressively pursue and enforce the existing rules and regulations.

It seems clear that the problem lies with Big Pharma pursuing Big Profits.

What, in practicality, can Obama do? Simple. He can publicly call out all his Big Pharma donors and supporters & publicly shame them into upping their production of drugs and continuing production of drugs on which they're not making as much profit.

And what's with "notifying the FDA if medically necessary drugs are being discontinued"? What is the FDA expected or empowered to do at that point? Manufacture the drugs itself? Authorize importation of foreign drugs?

If the proposed legislation in the House and Senate IS passed, so what? What can a customer do when it's announced 6 months out that a shortage is coming? Start hoarding the medication? That will only bring about the shortage sooner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't suppose the drug reimportation bill the WH killed would have helped
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 07:13 AM by No Elephants
cure drug shortages that lead to price gouging.

Geebus. Aren't research grants, crazy profits and the bailouts under Part D of Medicare and the Health Care Reform bill enough for the drug companies?

And this is voluntary anyway. Whooptie frickin' do.


"The FDA says major causes of drug shortages are quality or manufacturing problems, or delays in receiving components from suppliers. Drug makers also discontinue certain drugs in favor of newer medications that are more profitable. The FDA does not have authority to force drug makers to continue production of a drug."

If they can't order continuation of production, can they at least cancel the patent, so someone can make it, if they wish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oooooh yeah, put a Tiger Team on it, form a committee. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama orders FDA to help reduce drug shortages
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama is directing the Food and Drug Administration to take steps to reduce drug shortages, action he says will help stop a "slow-rolling problem" that puts patients at risk and raises the potential for price gouging.

Obama signed an executive order in the Oval Office on Monday instructing the FDA to take action in three areas: broadening its reporting of potential drug shortages; accelerating reviews of applications to change production of drugs facing potential shortages; and giving the Justice Department more information about possible instances of collusion or price gouging.

Patient deaths have been blamed on the shortages, which tend to affect cancer drugs, anesthetics, drugs used in emergency medicine, and electrolytes needed for intravenous feeding. Hospitals have been forced to buy from secondary suppliers at huge markups. Surgeries and cancer treatments have been delayed.

"Even though the FDA has successfully prevented an actual crisis, this is one of those slow-rolling problems that could end up resulting in disaster for patients and health care facilities all over the country," Obama said.

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_FDA?SITE=WILAC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DreamSmoker Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Obama snaps his fingers and the DEA jumps????
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 01:56 PM by DreamSmoker
Yet screw those who need the Medical Cannabis just to get through each day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why now? Why not when the shortage was first announced? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. This is a duplicate to cal04's LBN post earlier today, which made it to the greatest page.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 03:20 PM by Divernan
Of course, the responses really tore into Obama.

5043327
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. This executive order is a hollow sham, put out for PR
This "executive order" is a PR stunt which does NOTHING to alleviate the problem.
Posted earlier on the first LBN thread on this story.

I quote from the article: "The FDA does not have authority to force drug makers to continue production of a drug."

There is no mention or explanation or detail offered as to how this "executive order" in any manner changes the rules and regulations under which the FDA operates. IF there is ANYTHING the FDA can ALREADY do to "take action", nothing in the Executive Order changes that, and Obama need only have simply ordered the FDA to more aggressively pursue and enforce the existing rules and regulations.

It seems clear that the problem lies with Big Pharma pursuing Big Profits.

What, in practicality, can Obama do? Simple. He can publicly call out all his Big Pharma donors and supporters & publicly shame them into upping their production of drugs and continuing production of drugs on which they're not making as much profit.

And what's with "notifying the FDA if medically necessary drugs are being discontinued"? What is the FDA expected or empowered to do at that point? Manufacture the drugs itself? Authorize importation of foreign drugs?

If the proposed legislation in the House and Senate IS passed, so what? What can a customer do when it's announced 6 months out that a shortage is coming? Start hoarding the medication? That will only bring about the shortage sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Demeter's comment on earlier thread: "And what exactly is the FDA supposed to do about it?

Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 06:46 AM by Demeter
Allow dangerous drugs on the market?

Or just maybe, allow importation of safe and effective drugs from Canada and Western Europe?

Why doesn't he sic the Justice department on Pfizer instead, and bust the drug cartel which has been systematically buying up and shutting down the competition?

(read the link...what a load of crap. How can they call this reporting?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. From No Elephants: "Don't suppose the drug reimportation bill the WH killed would have helped.
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-31-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't suppose the drug reimportation bill the WH killed would have helped

Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 08:13 AM by No Elephants
cure drug shortages that lead to price gouging.

Geebus. Aren't research grants, crazy profits and the bailouts under Part D of Medicare and the Health Care Reform bill enough for the drug companies?

And this is voluntary anyway. Whooptie frickin' do.


"The FDA says major causes of drug shortages are quality or manufacturing problems, or delays in receiving components from suppliers. Drug makers also discontinue certain drugs in favor of newer medications that are more profitable. The FDA does not have authority to force drug makers to continue production of a drug."

If they can't order continuation of production, can they at least cancel the patent, so someone can make it, if they wish?
90% v. 10%, not R v. D. If you misdiagnose, you'll likely mistreat. If you mistreat, improvement is less likely. Koch = Evil
Alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hey, Divernan! Watch out! I just hired Right Haven's lawyer!
j/k I/m flattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. So, there was a segment on this on MSNBC. A $12 vile of cancer medicine selliing for like $900
Who's show was it on?
Hardball?
Last Word?
Maddow?

This is a BIG deal and should be exposed.

President Obama is doing a GOOD thing trying to solve this problem.

On the segment they also said that since there is a shortage of the drug that fights the cancer the research teams can't study 'new' drugs because the patients taking the 'older' drugs are few and far between.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Just got a price on Nexium last night. For someone with no insurance $562 for one month.
Edited on Tue Nov-01-11 04:32 AM by No Elephants
For those who don't know, Nexium blocks stomach acid, like Tums on steroids in capsule form.

Not rocket science.

If you have severe gut problems, though, it could save you from serious damage from acid. And, if your problems cause vomiting, might save you from esophageal cancer, damaging your teeth, etc.

Still under patent, I think, but far from a new drug. It's been around since at least th emid NIneties.

I am seriously considering complaining to my doc of symptoms so I can put it on my insurance and help out someone who needs it. Yep, spent my childhood in Sunday School and am seriously considered criminal conduct to help someone who needs a medication.

Wonder how my Sunday School teacher would handle that one?

Thanks for the moral dilemma, PHRMA. Go, USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. I hope this works -
I take a prophylactic dose of tetracycline to help control my rosecea. I know rosecea isn't cancer or anything that is going to kill me, but it's still nice not to have a red, blotchy, nasty-looking face. Anyway, I went to renew my script and got a call from the pharmacy. They don't have it in stock and they don't know when they are going to have it in stock again. I'm fine in terms of my rosecea treatment, but tetracycline happens to be one of the only antibiotics that I'm not allergic to, so now I'm hoping that I don't wind up needing it on a non-prophylactic basis for an infection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC