Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nato ends military operations in Libya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 10:10 PM
Original message
Nato ends military operations in Libya
Source: The Guardian

Anders Fogh Rasmussen rules out intervention in Syria as he hails 'successful chapter' in alliance's history

Richard Norton-Taylor | Monday October 31 2011 19.22 GMT

Nato has announced the end of its military operation against Libya after using a unique combination of military power that could set a model for future warfare. Speaking in Tripoli after 9,600 strike sorties over seven months in which more than 1,000 tanks, vehicles, guns, and Gaddafi's air defence and command and control network, were destroyed, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, secretary general of the world's most powerful military alliance, proclaimed the end of "a successful chapter in Nato's history". Nato countries knew from their own experience that "hard-won freedom brings high hopes and great expectations, and the hard work to make them real has begun", he added.

Rasmussen ruled out Nato military action in Syria. "Nato has no intention (to intervene) whatsoever. I can completely rule that out," he told reporters. "Having said that, I strongly condemn the crackdown on the civilian population in Syria. What has happened in Libya sends a clear signal. You cannot neglect the will of the people."

Lt Gen Charles Bouchard, Canadian commander of the Nato operation based in Naples, said that despite political disputes, Nato had "stayed the course". Yet though it was an operation conducted by Nato commanders, barely half of the alliance's members took part in the military operation. It was truly a "coalition of the willing" – while Britain and France flew a third of all missions, Germany and Poland played no part at all.

The US took a back seat as far as air strikes were concerned though Nato commanders say that they could not have succeeded without American intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance planes, and air-to-air refuelling aircraft. And in contributions which were as important politically as militarily, Qatar, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates, took part in the Nato-run campaign.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/31/nato-ends-libya-rasmussen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jenan Moussa
jenanmoussa Jenan Moussa
Did you know people of #Misurata called #Nato planes "Hanan"? Meaning: "tenderness". "Here comes Miss tender," they tell one another. #libya
3 hours ago

jenanmoussa Jenan Moussa
I asked pple here in #Misurata about #Nato role in #libya."At one point we could only sleep when we heard sound of their planes," some said.
3 hours ago

http://twitter.com/#!/jenanmoussa

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. THE US TOOK A BACK SEAT...
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent news!
NATO can take a break from this action, and finish up activities in AF-PAK.

Syria's Assad can rest slightly easy, BUT not for long....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC