Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Court Refuses Amish Man's Appeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:02 PM
Original message
U.S. Court Refuses Amish Man's Appeal
PITTSBURGH - A federal appeals court on Thursday refused a request to keep a Canadian Amish man in the United States while he challenges a law requiring his photo be taken for legal residence in the country.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals turned away an emergency appeal seeking to prevent Daniel Zehr's removal.

Zehr's attorney, Mark Knapp, did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment Thursday. U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan said the Department of Homeland Security might continue efforts to send Zehr back to Canada.



http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040423/ap_on_re_us/amish_border_security_5

This is obscene. Like any of the Old Orders would be a threat to anything.... except traffic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. well
how do you propose we handle a special rule just for the Amish?

My parents live in Amish country... I love the Amish. But I don't think they need or deserve special immigration rules.

How does one prove that they ARE Amish? How do you prevent someone from faking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ummm, cause he lives there as one of them. has married a US
citizen and is from Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not discussing a single case...
I'm talking about how you make a POLICY that exempts one religion over another. It can't be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Remember the woman in FL?
that didn't want her pic taken for drivers license

Court ruled against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. He know what the law was before he came.
amd it is not an unreasonable one. He should have stayed away or had his photo taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So, what was the applicable U. S. law BEFORE 911 that dealt with....
...this kind of situation? There WASN'T one, was there?

Did you even read the article before you chipped in your two cents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. First...
the article doesn't say he came before 9/11. It just says he came in 2001.

Second... was there REALLY no requirement that people applying for permanent residency have their photo taken prior to 9/11/01? I find that hard to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I've got family immigration documents from the 1910s....
and they all have photos on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Sorry, cameras hadn't been invented when my family lines came over...
...in the 1600s and 1700s.

Feel better now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. My point was...
that photographs for immigration documents isn't a new thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't care what the law was before 9/11
if he wants to stay in this country he has to obey the law of the land like everyone else.

Using the bible to justify bypassing the law is not acceptable. What if he wanted to bring in three wives and the right to practice Sharia. Would we let him to so to avoid treading on his religious beliefs. I don't think so.

Thats a dimes worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Here's about 50 cents worth...
...Number One: He's married to an American citizen, and as such, he should be granted all of the rights of an American citizen. This extra layer of "Homeland Security" bureaucracy combined with the so-called "Patriot Act" has created a Fascist state, IMHO.

Number Two: The Amish have lived in this country for quite a long time, and we as a country have always respected their way of life. What's changed? Have the Amish suddenly become a threat to National Security?

Number Three: Your example of a man and his three wives had nothing to do with this issue at all...what was your point in using it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. What rights is he being denied?
He's to be allowed to immigrate, provided he complies with the law, which requires a photograph.

Why should he be exempt from standard immigration law that's been in place for a hundred years?

Suppose he objected to having standard immunization shots required for immigration. Should he be able to skate on that too? After all, some fundie sects don't believe in immunization, right?

Suppose he had been convicted of a crime in his homeland for practicing his religion. Should the laws about felons not being able to immigrate be waived for him?

Religious beliefs have NEVER been worthy of a waiver of the law before. Why start now? Is that a door you REALLY want to open?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. But you still
haven't shown that ANY of this is related to 9/11 or the Department of Homeland Security making new regulations.

If you're going to be as snarky as you are, at least back up your points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is it common that the Amish do not like having their photo taken?
I have never heard of this before until now.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes it is...
though it doesn't seem to be a hard and fast rule.

I guess it's a violation of the Graven Images commandment, although my mother has pictures of her Amish friends that were given to her by them, albeit somewhat secretly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks for the info. I learn something new every day here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. The Amish don't like any of the trappings of any modern industrialized...
...nation. They prefer to live simply without any modern conveniences to include cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's not necessarily true.
If a modern "convenience" is required for something like employment, they can and do use them. When I lived in PA, I had some construction work done by an Amish contractor. He had a cellphone. He didn't take it into his house, but had a "phone box" outside that he left it in so that it wouldn't intrude into his home life. When he worked, he had it with him and used it. His community didn't hassle him about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. "Don't like" and "prefer" aren't reason enough
We may not like paying taxes, and for an extreme libertarian that might be a deeply held belief. We don't give people exemptions for that. The man won't have travelled to and from the USA and Canada without taking advantage of some parts of modern society, eg roads. It's about time he recognised he has to allow some things in return.

Anyway, photos aren't 'graven'. He should stop being so childish. 3000 year old rules invented when there were no such things as photographs shouldn't be set in stone, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. clip clop clip clop BANG BANG clip clop clip clop- -- - - - - --?
Amish drive-by shooting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. This makes me angry
Chickenz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC