Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street Transaction Tax Would Raise $350 Billion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:32 AM
Original message
Wall Street Transaction Tax Would Raise $350 Billion
Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- A minuscule tax on financial transactions proposed by congressional Democrats would raise more than $350 billion over the next nine years, according to an analysis by the Joint Tax Committee, a nonpartisan congressional scorekeeping panel.

The analysis was sent Monday to the offices of Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), the lawmakers who proposed the tax, and provided to The Huffington Post.

The Wall Street Trading and Speculators Tax Act would impose a tax of 0.03 percent on financial transactions, meaning that longterm investors would barely notice it, but traders who move rapidly in and out of positions would feel its sting and, the authors hope, reduce the volume of their speculation in response.

-snip-

Some believe that the global nature of the Occupy Wall Street movement will boost the chances of the transaction tax being signed into law. While the movement has been criticized for lacking specific demands, protesters have voiced their support for a "meaningful" tax being placed on Wall Street trading.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/07/wall-street-transaction-tax-revenue_n_1080493.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't that tax non taxable accounts? Or would they be exempt?
Could this be a back door to taxing iras and Roth iras and muni bonds? Who is to say it will always be .03%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. no. yes
no. No one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't see a mention of an exemption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. they should be taxing options and derivatives
instead of stock transfers, but....
this has to go world wide, tho. it will be easy enough for the rich and greedy to do their trading in london or tokyo instead of new york. i never thought i would see the day that that would seem doable, but maybe now is the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Gee another industry moving to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Maybe
but in China they execute people for doing what we pay millions for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Lets have a mass exodus to China of any industry or
person who wants to go. Then, we can see the patriots who remain and we can start rebuilding the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's what Obama wouldn't agree to at the G20 meeting last week.
Edited on Tue Nov-08-11 10:04 AM by dipsydoodle
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yep!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Taxes such as these never generate estimated revenue because the people targeted change behavior.
Also the idea that the problem was the volume of transactions and not the nature of the transactions themselves
is just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nineteen50 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Increase that tax to 1% until the budget balances then
lower it to .03. Create some incentive. Raise it back to 1%
when the budget is not balanced. Create some incentive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. What's the incentive for congress to balance the budget if they keep it imbalanced
to gain more revenue.

Suppose your boss told you he would give you a raise each and every year you incurred new credit card debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. No it wouldn't
They would just move the trades. It is a very easy tax to evade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celefin Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Limit it to derivatives, make it higher and call it 'Gambling other people's money tax act' -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. OR--and this is crazy, I know--restore Glass-Steagall! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celefin Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's way too uncomplicated. Asides, you have to look forward I've been told. -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC