Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Va. sex offenders held long after sentence up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
discocrisco01 Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:33 AM
Original message
Some Va. sex offenders held long after sentence up
Source: Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Having already served their sentences, hundreds of Virginia sex offenders are held behind bars for months — some for years — while waiting to see whether they'll be sent to a psychiatric center indefinitely, an Associated Press review has found.
Judges acting on the requests of both prosecutors and defense attorneys routinely shrug off the legal deadline for making that decision, leaving the inmates in limbo well beyond their designated punishment and without access to the very kind of treatment the state says they may need.
Attorneys and authorities blame the delays on court backlogs and note that in some cases, the postponements benefit the inmates.
Either way, the result is that just one out of six cases gets decided by the deadline, which the law says should be extended only for "good cause," according to figures obtained by the AP through a series of public records requests.
Virginia and 19 other states allow certain sex offenders to be detained at psychiatric facilities after their sentences are served if they have a mental disorder that would make them more likely to offend again. In Virginia, the Attorney General's Office files a civil petition to deem someone a sexually violent predator, and a judge and jury decide whether the offender should be committed.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iKdiDyKx4oI3_v6fD-sfM50vQ-ew?docId=763c93398a7b4b9a94158843d51dfcb2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. But hey, they don't get rights, right?
..because rights are only for the people we say get them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyton Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. love this quote ...
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 12:17 PM by guyton
The Attorney General's Office argues that speedy trial rights don't apply in such cases — these are civil rather than criminal proceedings.

Um, except that they are being held in prison while awaiting their civil proceeding. WTF?!

Oh well, they're just sex-offenders who've served their time. Nothing to see here. Everyone move on. Don't worry about that quaint old Constitution thingie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. The VA legislature is the problem here. The need to change the assessment tool that's used.
The Static-99 is causing the problem here...

"The Static-99 involves 10 questions meant to predict the likelihood of a repeat sex crime. Offenders get points for predictors that range from their criminal history to whether they have lived with a lover for more than two years.

Since Virginia began using the Static-99, the number of those determined eligible for commitment jumped from about 7 percent of all sex offenders being released from prison to about 25 percent.

Offenders who score a 5 or above — or above a 4 if the crime included violence against children — are referred to a committee. Members evaluate the prisoner to determine whether to recommend that the Attorney General’s Office file a civil case to have the person declared a sexually violent predator eligible for commitment. A judge and jury make the final determination.

SNIP

Out of the 20 states with civil commitment programs, Virginia is the only one that relies solely on the Static-99 as a screening tool. Other states that use it allow mental health professionals to administer the test and determine if the offender is a real threat."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/crime-scene/post/va-assessment-of-sex-offenders-flawed-study-says/2011/11/15/gIQAefmLON_blog.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. and the Supreme Court approved this in US v. Comstock
but if those sex offenders are really worth indef sentences why not just sentence them to life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC