Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Energy Providers Seek Grant as Step to Build Nuke Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 03:37 AM
Original message
NYT: Energy Providers Seek Grant as Step to Build Nuke Plant
Energy Providers Seek Grant as Step to Build Nuclear Plant
By MATTHEW L. WALD

Published: April 26, 2004


WASHINGTON, April 25 - Amid growing signs of interest in building nuclear power plants, a consortium of companies plans to ask the federal government on Monday for $400 million to help prepare an application to build a reactor.

Separately, six companies applied on Friday for a smaller grant to study building an advanced reactor on the site of a twin-reactor project abandoned in 1988 as too expensive.

The consortium first announced its interest in building a nuclear power plant on March 31, but it plans to tell the Energy Department on Monday that it has added two big partners, the Tennessee Valley Authority and Duke Power, a unit of Duke Energy. It will also provide a firmer budget for its work.

The group, which has named itself NuStart Energy Development, initially included Exelon Nuclear, a unit of the Exelon Corporation; Entergy Nuclear, a unit of the Entergy Corporation; Constellation Energy; the Southern Company; and EDF International North America, a subsidiary of Électricité de France, which owns shares in reactors in the United States.

The consortium also includes General Electric and the Westinghouse Electric Company, a subsidiary of BNFL, which was formerly British Nuclear Fuels Limited.

The initial announcement by the consortium drew criticism from antinuclear groups, who complained about safety, vulnerability to terrorism and the problem of disposing spent fuel....


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/26/business/26nuke.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Entergy needs to find the 2 fuel rods in VT first n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Quick thinking, maddezmom!
"Entergy Corp. said two spent fuel rod segments were missing at its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vermont, the company told the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in an event report Thursday.

The company said in a statement released on the NRC Web site its engineers are 'reviewing storage record and performing a thorough inspection of the spent fuel pool to determine the location of the rod segments.'":

Reuters
RPT-Fuel rods missing at Entergy's Vermont Yankee nuke
Thursday April 22, 8:27 am ET

http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040422/utilities_entergy_vermontyankee_2.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Free enterprise" at work
Why does the nuclear power industry always feel so entitled to taxpayer funding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Corporate welfare
at its finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC