Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

please lock dupe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:15 AM
Original message
please lock dupe
Edited on Fri May-14-04 07:14 AM by maddezmom
info contained in another thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=553762#554392

By PAULINE JELINEK, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon (news - web sites)'s No. 2 general and the deputy defense secretary said they were unaware of interrogation rules approved for use in Iraq (news - web sites) allowing the use of dogs or days of sleep deprivation.

~snip~

But the approved techniques have also raised concerns on the committee. A summary of "Interrogation Rules of Engagement" provided to senators by Army officials says that, with a general's written approval, prisoners could be subjected to stressful positions for up to 45 minutes, isolation for more than 30 days, military dogs and up to 72 hours of "sleep management."


Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said he believed the policy would allow prisoners to be held "naked, with a bag over their head, squatting with their arms uplifted for 45 minutes."


Both Pace and Wolfowitz said such treatment would appear to violate the Geneva Conventions. But they said they weren't familiar with the interrogation techniques approved for use in Iraq.


The Pentagon late Thursday issued a statement saying the scenario Reed described would be "contrary to our regulations. Senator Reed is mistaken."

~snip~
more:http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=542&ncid=718&e=1&u=/ap/20040514/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_prisoner_abuse

Looks like more officials are distancing themselves from the torture and methods approved by DOD. Later in the article MG Miller defending methods used....... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. But Cambone knew
Line Increasingly Blurred Between Soldiers and Civilian Contractors
http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_7648.shtml

An Overseer of Intelligence Efforts at the Defense Department
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/12/politics/12cambone.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Come on people. How long are we going to stand for this total and utter
incompetence. This administration has done more to help terrorist then to hurt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. one thing is sure...CIA needs oversight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. CIA needs oversight? You need oversight! This whole damn court needs
oversight! Oh, wrong movie. Anyway this entire administration wants to do what it wants to do any not have anyone question them. I think the republicans are going to find it very hard to give them cover when they continued to fuck up all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC