Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: F.B.I. Begins Polygraph Tests in Chalabi Inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:53 PM
Original message
NYT: F.B.I. Begins Polygraph Tests in Chalabi Inquiry
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/03/politics/03CHAL.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=

Federal investigators have begun administering polygraph examinations to civilian employees at the Pentagon to determine who may have disclosed highly classified intelligence to Ahmad Chalabi, the Iraqi who authorities suspect turned the information over to Iran, government officials said Wednesday.

The polygraph examinations, which are being conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, are focused initially on a small number of Pentagon employees who had access to the information that was compromised. American intelligence officials have said that Mr. Chalabi informed Iran that the United States had broken the secret codes used by Iranian intelligence to transmit confidential messages to posts around the world.

Mr. Chalabi has denied the charge. On Wednesday, his lawyers made public a letter they said they had sent to Attorney General John Ashcroft and F.B.I. Director Robert S. Mueller III repeating Mr. Chalabi's denials and demanding that the Justice Department investigate the disclosure of the accusations against Mr. Chalabi.

The lawyers, John J. E. Markham II and Collette C. Goodman, said in the letter, "The charges made against Dr. Chalabi — both the general and the specific ones are false."

They also said, "We ask that you undertake an immediate investigation to find and hold accountable those who are responsible for these false leaks."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. you beat me to it by seconds! nice catch, rmpalmer!
Hey Bushco! Didn't anybody ever tell you not to ratfuck the CIA?

Outing an undercover CIA agent and everyone she ever worked with was a big mistake. The spooks love their anonymity.

The End of BushCo has begun in full. Lots of news today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who's on the short list for a polygraph? Hmm...
Rumsfeld, Cambone, Feith, Wolfowitz, Perle?

Like that would ever happen. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Rumsfeld, Cambone, Feith, Wolfowitz, Perle, Woosley = civilian!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. CIA a Terrorist Group
I sure wouldn't wanna be on their shit list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. They Could Save A Lot Of Time
By starting with Dimwit and working their way down the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Its probably a short list
In 1941, when the U.S. broke Japanese codes, there were only about 10 people who were allowed to see the messages - the Secretary of War, the President, the Chief of Naval Operations, etc. A few more technical people were involved in the transcriptions.

Of the people that had knowledge, only a few probably had any contact with Chalabi. The number of suspects should be a short list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. is this just a big show?
is there any reason to trust Ashcroft or Mueller to do any kind of investigation that could possibly damage Bush?

Now, the CIA's investigation is another matter...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC