Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Condemns White House Support for Chalabi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 11:35 PM
Original message
Kerry Condemns White House Support for Chalabi
Responding to reports that Ahmad Chalabi may have leaked critical United States secrets to Iran, Senator John Kerry on Wednesday blasted the Bush administration for ever backing Mr. Chalabi as an Iraqi exile leader, saying he met him in London years ago and deemed him unworthy of American support.
<snip>

In a 15-minute news conference, his first since May 14, Mr. Kerry disputed Mr. Bush's assessment that Iraq is the main front in the effort against terror and said the administration was creating a "backdoor draft" by repeatedly extending military duty tours. He used the session, which followed a panel discussion on biological weapons, to praise the recent outreach to the United Nations, saying, "All of us want the president to be successful."
<snip>

"The Guard and Reserve have been turned into almost active duty," Mr. Kerry said. "People serving beyond the time of their voluntary service are no longer volunteers."
<snip>

"Of all the issues Senator Kerry could choose to campaign against the president on," Mr. Falkenrath said, "this has got to be his worst choice."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/03/politics/campaign/03kerry.html


Mr. Falkenrath apparently thinks Mr. Kerry should express admiration for the Administration's cunning choice of Chalabi as an intelligence source for planning the Iraq adventure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. fuck falkenrath
and who is falkenrath anyways ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Richard Falkenrath
former "weapons-proliferation expert" at Harvard
former Deputy Homeland security Advisor for *

But from the article, I conclude he's STILL a political hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Falkenrath's statement is very laughable. It just proves how bad
these guys really are at lying. They have no clue on how bad the Chalabi fallout will be. It's one scandal after an other with these criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the Kerry campaign should respond:
"Richard Falkenrath, who was until recently a leading White House aide on the subject, said the attacks were akin to Thomas E. Dewey's arguing in 1944 that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was weak on retaking Europe."

First of all, George Bush is no FDR-

Richard Falkenrath's plan and policy for HomeLand Security
remains incomplete and in limbo much like Iraq and the Bush Administration.

Falkenrath says:

"There is no perfect template for what a homeland security strategy should look like," said Richard A. Falkenrath, special assistant to the President and senior OHS director for policy and plans. And the strategy document "is not an operational plan," he said.

As developed, the document breaks homeland security into 10 basic areas and 84 specific activities. Those 10 areas are intelligence and warning, border and transportation security, domestic counter terrorism, critical infrastructure protection, catastrophic threats, emergency preparedness and response, law, science and technology, information sharing, and international cooperation.

Falkenrath admits that "this strategy is incomplete, as it does not deal with the international dimensions of homeland security." It doesn't address the war on terrorism, which the Administration defines as a component of national security. Indeed, Philip Zelikow, director of the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia and a forum participant, criticized this bifurcation. He believes "homeland security and national security will eventually be treated as indistinguishable."

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/topstory/8036/8036notw8.html

addendum:

reading to the end of the above article, Bush's only concern was gaining the flexibility of moving money from one account to another.

"On June 6--weeks before OHS released its national strategy--the President sent Congress "a very spare and parsimonious bill," just 35 pages long, creating the Department of Homeland Security, Falkenrath said. "We wanted just enough law to create the department and give it tools to succeed."

"The Administration can work with the bill passed by the House, Falkenrath said, but the Senate bill now being debated "is a different story." That bill, he said, contains "no reorganization authority, no transfer authority ... and there is a lack of personnel flexibility."

The President has asked for authority to move 5% of any budget account to another account to pay for the transition. If the final bill does not contain some transfer authority and other management flexibility--especially personnel flexibility--the President will veto it, he said."

Falkenrath was nothing more than another cloak for the operation of the Bush agenda...The unfettered Manipulation of Tax Payer dollars unsupervised, and accountable to no one for the dispersement of public funds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Too bad he didn't say anything BEFORE it was
the politically fashionable thing to do.

Could've saved the world alot of grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is a fool for following Chalabi
he loses 2 percentage points right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cunning choice
Is that a new term "incredible blunder"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kerry: Bush snookered by Chalabi 'hook, line and sinker'
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said Wednesday he has long had misgivings about Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi, now under suspicion for passing secret U.S. government information to Iran, while the Bush administration "bought into Mr. Chalabi hook, line and sinker."
<snip>

"The main front on the war on terror is in 60 countries around the world with al-Qaida and a host of other radical organizations, some of which are in countries that are our friends," he said.
<snip>

Kerry added: "I regret that this administration, for whatever reasons, bought into Mr. Chalabi hook, line and sinker. I think it's cost us significantly."
<snip>

Before the round-table, Kerry told AP Radio that the federal government needs to do a better job of preparing homeland security for a biological attack.

http://www.trivalleyherald.com/Stories/0,1413,86~10669~2189430,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC