Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Census: It pays to be a man in most jobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CShine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:53 PM
Original message
Census: It pays to be a man in most jobs
If a woman wants to make more money than a man, her job options are severely limited. She could clean up hazardous waste. Or install telecommunications lines. But not much else. The Census Bureau compiled statistics on hundreds of job categories from its 2000 headcount and found just five where women typically earn at least as much as men.

Among hazardous material removal workers, women earn $1.09 for every dollar earned by man. It's slightly more than a dollar for telecommunications line installer and repairers, and it was exactly dollar-for-dollar in three categories: meeting and convention planners; dining room or cafeteria workers; and construction trade helpers. Each of these fields employs predominantly men, except for meeting planning.

Myra Strober, a Stanford University economics professor, said the report and other studies show, "If you are a young woman and want to go into an occupation to earn more money, you'll want to do that in an occupation dominated by men."

Indeed, in the field with the highest proportion of female workers - kindergarten and preschool teachers, nearly 98 percent women - men had median earnings of $22,000, $5,000 more than for women. Among registered nurses, 91 percent were women, but their median income was $42,000. Men made $45,000, according to the Census Bureau's study.

The report was based on 2000 census results that tracked 1999 income data for 505 job categories. However, the rankings of median earnings for women and men were based on a subset of about 400 fields that employed at least 10,000 full-time, year-round workers, including at least 1,000 men and 1,000 women. Nationally, the median income for a woman working full-time, year-round was about $28,000, compared with $38,000 for a man. That means a woman earned less than 74 cents for every dollar earned by a man.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1152&slug=Gender%20Income
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well every makes the same money in my trade.
As per Union rule everyone makes the same rate. Which is fair and how it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sure this is the 'equal pay for work of equal value' thing.
It makes a nice slogan, but if you have a part timer vs. a full timer and you expect the part timer to make the same money, well, it's hard to make that happen in the real world. Averages aren't the same as, say, having two people with the same position who differ only in sex getting different pay. That basically doesn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes it does
Discrimination is alive and well. Yes, folks in the same jobs get different salaries based on their race and gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myccrider Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uh, what planet do you live on?
The glass ceiling exists and wage discrimination based on sex is alive and well in the US.

I've ALWAYS made less than the guys working right beside me. The powers that be often tried to disguise the discrimination by playing games with classification/seniority, but it was only a game. Even when I had as much if not more experience/seniority/better results as the men, I got paid less (and often carried a much heavier workload at the same time).

Every woman I worked with or for had the same experience - engineers all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Perhaps, we've come a long way. But, we've a long way to go.
I've always worked twice as hard to earn a good chunk less than my male counterpart. Now, that I am 40-something,...along with a good deal more education than most folks (8 years total),...maturity & "overqualification" seem to be two more obstacles to career pursuits. It's tough and it sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. yes... but women do not get the ...
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 07:49 AM by cap
same mentorship to get into the higher pay scales;ergo, they aren't in the higher pay scales. Their line supervisors continually give them the dead end assignments so that most women do not rise above a mid-level. No adjustment is made so that men and women can take adequate time off to take care of families without penalty. So equality is not really equality even under better work conditions, ie union rules. You just don't see how the system is rigged.

Let's face it, at the end of the day, many men want their wives to make more money; but they also want their wives to do most of the housework/child care (especially when the second child is born). When it comes down to telling the boss that they have to be home because their wife must work/take courses, they won't do so. They choose to work the extra hours or choose their schedule over taking time off to attend to matters at the home. They just don't want to do the housework; they would rather work. The big calls for work/life balance are coming from women; men are not calling for this -- they just don't want to do it. Your union is not demanding work/life balance for all its members. This issue is seen as a "women's issue" and not an issue for all members of the labor force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. But There Are SO Few MEN With... er, Jobs...
Guys with penises, Penni, dicks... sure!

Hell, they're a dime a dozen.

But Men... In actual jobs...

:takemetoyourleader:

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. They call this "news"?
not to any woman working in corporate America. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'll file this under
the "duh" category of news...

but at least it's being reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC