Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLINTON DISAPPOINTMENT: LEFT OFF FUNERAL SPEAKERS LIST [drudge, sorry]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:16 PM
Original message
CLINTON DISAPPOINTMENT: LEFT OFF FUNERAL SPEAKERS LIST [drudge, sorry]
http://drudgereport.com/rr1.htm

<snip>

"President Clinton really held out all hope the funeral would be a nonpartisan event, like Nixon's was," a top Clinton source said on Tuesday morning. "He's angry and disappointed neither he nor President Carter have been asked to speak, as of yet."

<snip>

Clinton's inner circle is convinced Nancy Reagan has personally shut out Clinton from any high-profile participation.

"It is a state funeral, using tax dollars," the top Clinton insider explained.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. ah, drude. he really is a pro. manages to get the little things wrong
nancy would not be the one to block clinton. it would be bush. but drudge doesn't want to say that nancy hates the bushes because that would lead to "why" questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Actually it's the Reagan family's loss. Millions would watch just hear
Clinton. Nevertheless, I think it lets Clinton off the hook for trying to find something nice to say about a man whose "leagacy" is largely a myth funded, supported, and perpertrated by the conservative zealots trying to make the ignoble noble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
83. It's all just another GOP political ad
This is going to be another big "get up the bush poll number" weeks, using anything they can to make it happen, couldn't wait for October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. is this a faux pas?
don't all living presidents speak at state funerals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Gerald Ford did not speak. . . .
at Nixon's funeral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I think Nixon's funeral was a tad different..
He wasn't exactly someone you'd be clamoring to eulogize (political associations and all). But Clinton should be allowed to speak.. or at least Carter.. I'm amazed that GW is allowed to be the main speaker.. I would be more supportive of Ford, Poppy Bush, to do that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. Clinton was the sitting President ...

Clinton had a "duty" for the Nixon funeral. Don't forget, Hillary helped the Nixon impeachment process.

I'm sure that Clinton probably LOATHES Reagan. Yet, he would probably give a MUCH better eulogy than GW Bush. If GW makes it out of the place without making an ass of himself, I'll be surprised.

He'll probably start playing "gotch yer nose" with the imbalmed Reagan corpse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Borgnine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #47
87. Oh, MAN.
That last sentence almost made me choke on a pretzel with laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. No.
He said enough when he pardoned him.:P Nixon didn't have a state funeral, did he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waruimono Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
75. Last state funeral was LBJ
Nixon's funeral was no a state funeral. It was a private affair

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. I Think It's Just RUDE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a Big Mistake on the Repubicans' Part
Think of it -- you could have had two Democratic presidents give a glowing speech on Reagan. Now it's an "us against them" mindset. Highlights the fact that the country is and was NOT united behind RR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. good thinking! :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
59. AND it highlights how THEY are the ones being divisive and small-
minded. Makes them look petty. So much for their "fearless" leader and his "uniter not a divider" crap. I'm wondering if anybody else around the country will pick up on this.

When they dedicated the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, they had all living presidents, at that time, present and accounted for, along with their first ladies, AND they ALL spoke. Carter, too. I covered that event. I remember Carter making a joke out of being surrounded by republi-CON presidents, and expressing the hope that in the near future, perhaps he'd be joined by one of HIS party's colleagues. This was when bush the elder was still in charge, before Clinton.

We should be pointing out that Reagan, regardless what we here feel about him, WAS the president for the entire country, and somehow, most of America - Dem and republi-CON - found some way to get more or less behind him. Plus, he won two uncontested elections, even though the first one was a little fishy (not like 2000, though!). For the republi-CONS to exclude two VERY prominent presidents, including the last one to share Reagan's position of having been a two-termer (and also coming close to, if not stealing outright, Reagan's claims to being a)a Teflon president and b)a Great Communicator. Plus, Clinton was the last TRULY popular president, considering his poll numbers at this stage of the game, AND all during the shit they threw at him.

So let them be petty. Somebody's gonna bring this out. Somebody in the mainstream. And we certainly should do our part, too. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR WOULD BE MOST EXCELLENT:

PLEASE NOTE MY SIG LINE – TO CALL YOUR REPS, TOLL FREE!!!

OR, TRY (877) – 762 – 8762. It’ll get you there, too! (Thank you, DUer redqueen!)


Please note, here, The World's Greatest Lists of Media Contacts – updated May 5, 2004– in the following thread:

LINK:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1533796#


IF THEY THINK WE DON’T CARE, THEY WON’T, EITHER!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bullshit. Clinton Has Too Much Class To Interfere
with a grieving widow and the funeral arrangements.

Drudge has access to Clinton's inner circle?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Drudge is closeted scumbag pile of cat sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill ORights Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
60. Now tell us what you really think! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
86. You rate him that high
I just got my cesspool cleaned out and saw a spitting image of Drudge at the bottom, too bad it's back in service and being filled up again. Pictures would have been so much more easier than comparing notes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton, but ESPECIALLY Carter better speak at the funeral
I don't give a rats ass about Rea-gone, but this is an important issue if this is indeed tax dollar funded. Plus, Carter is from the era before the Right-Wing went mad and made partisanship a big deal again. IF this is true, it will backfire like no other failure of these utter morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Carter was BEFORE the right wing went mad? Hardly!
The right wing HATED Carter with a passion almost as bad as the passion against Clinton.

I don't know why. None of it makes much sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. It's because he's a humanitarian
dogooder. The right hates them with a vengeance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MI Cherie Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
66. Carter fired poppy ...
... as CIA director.

"Bush's career as CIA director ended in January 1977 with the inauguration of Jimmy Carter."

see: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/History/CloudsOverGeorgeBush.html

& http://www.payk.net/mailingLists/iran-news/html/1997/msg01102.html

GEORGE BUSH (1976-1977) He expanded the agency's use of satellites and other high technology, but left remarkably few footprints at Langley during his brief tenure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #66
77. test
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 08:58 PM by powergirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
72. One thing about Carter - he's the ONLY ONE among them to have won
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 08:20 PM by calimary
a Nobel Peace Prize.

If that isn't prominent, I don't know what is. As I said earlier, it will just further underscore just how petty - and puny - these reprehensible people are. Or do they presume that only republi-CONS and right wingers be allowed to watch? Or to mourn? I thought Reagan was the president of the entire United States. Not just the conservative part of it.

Guess we better rename our country the DISunited States of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. when has propriety ever stopped a Republican
from using tax dollars for whatever the hell they want?

Here's the important answer that we need: Who holds ultimate responsibility for that decision?

And a note to our good friends Bill and Jimmy: so eulogize him anyway. I am sure the news will publish your statements regardless. You might even make note of the inappropriateness of the situation, and there is nothing in the world preventing you from taking a subtle political position in your remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I'm fairly sure
that this is Nancy's decision as to who speaks, although as far as I can tell, a sitting president has always spoken at a funeral of this type. Clinton spoke at Nixon's, and I believe that Nixon spoke at LBJ's. I don't know that I agree with the tax-dollars argument that some make, since tax dollars pay for many events that former presidents don't necessarily have the right to speak at (No one was demanding that * speak at the Wellstone memorial, I believe that Wellstone's family selected the speakers). Since it's only going to be 4 or 5 speakers anyway, I think Nancy should pick. I'm not going to watch, so it doesn't matter to me anyway. I agree that Jimmy and the Big Dog will probably publish eulogy statements somewhere, and I think that's probably the way to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. Reagan's corpse ...

.. was perfectly capable of flying coach. We didn't need to shuttle him on Air Force One. Next time Bush wants to run a herse service, he should pay out of his own pocket.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #48
64. and just WHO is gonna be paying for the gas in the jets to fly overhead?
The taxpayers... thats who!!! That is a ridiculous waste of money...
Our boys over there fighting for oil and we waste gas in these jets?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
55. That's A Really Good Idea!
A shadow funeral from the Loyal Opposition, carefully worded to show just how big a deceiver and crook and pusher of THE feel-good drug mindset Reagan was, that would be just the thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. President Clinton Nor President Carter would....
stoop down to the likes of a stupid and ignorant Drudge piece of shit.
Sounds like a planted story. It also sounds as a hidden vindictive attack on Nancy...maybe for her stand on stem cells. Or it could even be because she turned down a speakers position at the bush lovefest.

Republican don't even have respect for a grieving First Lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. They can't speak because their eloquence would make Dimson look
and sound REALLY, REALLY bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
67. hell, my beagle's howls
to go out, to eat, for a treat ... are more eloquent than Dimson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does Drudge really expect anyone to believe that a
Clinton insider (let alone a top source) would go to him and his waste of a site to complain. This is BS people. And they certainly wouldn't dump on the widow. This has Karl Rove written all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Drudge did also post that crap about Kerry having an affair so he is a
KNOWN LIAR!! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And I'm sure the same people who believed that
story are foaming at the mouth at this one. Bunch of lemmings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. That was my point
No Clinton insider would talk to Drudge, and certainly not take a swipe at Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
69. I agree - If Clinton was shut out - DimSon did it ... not Nancy
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 07:43 PM by SayitAintSo
After hearing how the Reagans hold the Bushes in contempt, can you really believe Drudge on this?

Can you ever REALLY believe him ?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. maybe it's for the best
Clinton got booed at the 911 concert. If he spoke I bet he'd get drowned in boos by the Reagan faithful.

Let them have their little Reagan orgy. Just makes them look sad and partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Hillary was booed.. by drunken firefighters and police. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. LOL!!........And what the hell did those firefighters get from Bush???
Absolutely nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. The line is being drawn.............and they are fighting words my friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
82. Exactly.
Bet they wouldn't boo her now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. this one needs a SCREAM
How dare they turn this into a partisan event? No democratic president to speak at the event? Remember Wellstone? Let's see how media reacts to this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. What Media? The Liberul Media? Faux?
They are too busy getting their noses caked with brown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
49. I can't wait ...

... for Bush to start rewriting history and telling how "Christian" Reagan was. Reagan never went to church. Neither did most of the founding fathers. But that doesn't matter to those in the ministry of truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. I just heard on AAR news (top of hour) that Kerry's going to the funeral
Attending, not speaking.

I wonder how bad the booing is going to be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well, you get what you give - there'll be more protesting and booing
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 03:05 PM by ktf23t
coming from my mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Kerry is also on California today.
He is paying his respects today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francine Frensky Donating Member (870 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. If this funeral turns into a political rally .......
let's give 'em a little taste of their own meds. Remember what the repubs were all screamin' after the Wellstone funeral?

Dems need to give it back 100%, say this was a partisan and inappropriate way to "use" the funeral for political gain, and raise a BIG stink.

Turnabouts fair play.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalcitizen Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. I wouldn't expect C to speak
He didn't have much to do with Reagan when he was pres. Is there a Dem who was RR's counterpoint other than Tip O'Neil who could speak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Dick Gephardt ...

Gephardt talked about how "civil" Reagan was and how easy he was to deal with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. "It's a cult funeral, using tax dollars."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immune2irony Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's all about Bill
I swear to fucking god, Clinton is not THAT self-centered, is he? Clinton spoke at Nixon's funeral because, duh, he was the sitting president. Clinton may surprised to learn he is not the center of the universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. nope. Clinton doesn't want to speak at RR's funeral
to do so would go against everything Clinton stood for during his Presidency

Drudge is lying again. don't fall for it. remember, Drudge "broke" the Kerry affair :eyes:

that was a lie and so is this

Clinton doesn't think he is the center of the universe either :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It is certainly not all about you.
obviously, you swallow Drudge whole without reflection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. No, he's not
This story is almost certainly bogus. Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. I can't believe you would believe anything that came
from Drudge. His site is a wasteland of inuendo, unnamed sources and out and out total BS. Don't get sucked into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Why do you care?
You think he's a failure. No, it's all about Drudge and any idiot that takes him at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
70. Hey guppie.... do you REALLY believe what Drudge spews ?
C'mon.... who are you really trying to kid here ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kbick Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. 100% Bushshit
Please don't Link Drudge. Come on think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
78. Not only does this story
not make sense, the writing is like that of one of the "mean girls" in junior high. It doesn't ring true to me, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Crap designed to goad Democrats into attacking Nancy
Drudge is Rove's personal propaganda master...Bush Rove's/co thinks the "Clinton faithful" will attack the Reagan family no holds barred if it is rumored that Clinton has been snubbed by Nancy Reagan personally.

Then of course phase two of their evil plot, would be to get the Reagan family so riled up that they will start defending bush to the death.

In a world where bush detractors were as out of touch and mentally challenged as bush himself, this tactic might work.

They are morons and no "top Clinton insider" would say the crap in that so called "scoop"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
80. Crap designed to goad Dems into attacking RR's funeral as a partisan event
Make us look like rabid loonies with no sense of decency, attacking a funeral.

The folks who are already on our side or the Dark Side remember Wellstone's funeral. The undecideds have either forgotten it or never heard of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. Yeah that too
Good point, I had that thought also but got so carried away with my initial theory that I forgot to mention it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheNewbieToBe Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. This seem wrong
Did not a bunch of Republicans speak at Wellstone's funeral? I believe they were also given a warm welcome by the Wellstone mourners. Free Bill and let him speak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MI Cherie Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
68. There were some who also ...
... exploited his death as a GOP fundraiser!

Welcome to DU!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. Why post this shit?
It's just out there to make Democrats look bad. Why do you want to help them? I will never in a million years understand what possesses people to help spread animosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
65. i think it's called "know thine enemy." i don't think that burying one's
head in the sand accomplishes much in the long run.


perhaps it isn't true. if it isn't, we've learned of another instance in which drudge faked a story, which is also useful information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #65
76. Bull
You think if they're going to make an issue out of something, it won't find it's way to CNN anyway? Don't you get it? They float shit on Drudge, see if it gets a response FROM ANYWHERE, then decide what to run with and what to let die. If we stop responding to this ignorance on Drudge, they won't have anything to run with. Who got in a tizz over that other faked story? Dems, that's who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
38. Just let them play their partisan games
It just lets everyone see what petty and vindictive twits they are.
I hope Drudge's article gets more attention.
I also can't believe I just said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. If you don't read Drudge, you won't be tempted to post Drudge.
Then, when it comes out that it's another lie, you won't be embarrassed, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. Until this appears in a grown up, legitimate news source
I'm not taking it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. CNN says the same thing
Actually, the wording is basically the same thing as what Drudge had so Drudge really just got a lot of his story from these writers. However, the whole part about Clinton being upset about not speaking isn't mentioned here.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/08/reagan.main/index.html

Eulogists announced

In Washington, the sound of cannon fire echoed through the streets Tuesday as Army units practiced for the ceremonies. The Air Force scheduled a Tuesday evening rehearsal for a planned fly-over on Wednesday's ceremonies.

Former President George H.W. Bush, former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney are scheduled to join President Bush in eulogizing Ronald Reagan at his state funeral service Friday, Reagan's office said.

The elder Bush was Reagan's vice president during his tenure in the White House from 1981-1989.

Baroness Thatcher was a close ally of Reagan who shared many of his conservative views and staunch opposition to Communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. I hope Mulrony ...

I hope Mulrony gives his eulogy in French. To conservatives, this is the black tongue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #51
85. Given Mulroney's relationship with Reagan
I would rate his tongue a slightly different colour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. I really doubt Clinton expected
to speak - but it would be nice if all previous President's spoke. Not that I will watch any of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. dems at repug funerals is a LOSE-LOSE situation
you end up either looking like you supported the idiot and his policies,or you look like a spoilsport for telling the TRUTH about the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
57. ..this just underscores the rethugs don't do anything without trying to
gain some advantage. Even death is fair game for these despicable creatures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. ...BTW....Mulroney was the original poodle for rethug Presidents before
Blair came along to take the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
61. Why Drudge crap on LBN? Obviously made up too?
Attracts freepers and other pests and does not much for DU's credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
62. wait in the tall grass, boys. the gop may make fools of themselves
if one of those lilly-livered gop yahoos that speaks at the funeral so much as hints at politics they will lose the presidential election in 2000.

yes, americans are tacky and they are crude, but they understand that this event is a rarity, a state/national function that occurs once or so in a generation, and is above mere politics. if the democrats are savaged by one of the reagan funeral speakers americans will consider that the gop is standing on the corpse of reagan for political purposes and it will repell them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. I completely agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
71. Remember Biden gave the eulogy at Strom Thurmonds Funeral ?
He did an incredible job. It was stunning. He told the truth, pulled no punches and still honored the man at the same time. Strom CHOSE him to speak. That said as much or more about Biden and the dems as anything.

Fu*k Drudge and the rest of puke partisan antics. I'm glad Clinton won't speak. I'd hate to see him have to dance around the truth. Can't you see the pukes using it in their election adds ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
73. Fear of Eloquence
Can you imagine the contrast? Clinton speaking at the same event as *?

http://www.wgoeshome.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
74. Does Anyone Believe Ms. Drudge Has Access to "Clinton's Inner Circle"?
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 08:24 PM by David Zephyr
Really!!!

What utter bullshit!!

Read Matt the Closet Queen's self-promoting words in his "story":

"CLINTON'S INNER CIRCLE is convinced Nancy Reagan has personally shut out Clinton from any high-profile participation.

"'It is a state funeral, using tax dollars," THE TOP CLINTON INSIDER explained."

What is Matt the Self-Loathing Homosexual really up to here?

It's easy:

Everyone on the planet that has a brain and who has a television or reads newspapers ALREADY HAD NOTICED that Carter and Clinton had been snubbed. All Matt is doing is stirring the shit up by creating a story with NO SOURCE WHATSOEVER and attributing it to some imaginary "top Clinton insider".

----------------

Personally, I hope that Clinton and Carter are not invited at this late stage as it does make a completely partisan event out of the funeral, doesn't it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
79. DRUDGE DISINFORMATION: SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL...
... BEAT CLINTON'S LOVE CHILD WITH JOHN KERRY'S INTERN

DEVELOPING SOFTER THAN A DOZEN RAW CRACKED GRADE A EGGS...

Okay (deep breath), I'll say this slowly -- especially for the FReepers lurking here.

Matt.

Drudge.

Is.

NOT.

A.

Reliable.

News.

Source.

PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
81. Larry King showed
a nice clip of Bill Clinton and Mrs. Reagan shaking hands and exchanging pleasantries at some event. From the way she was looking at him, I got the impression that she liked him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC