Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Sun-Times: Padilla's 'dirty bomb' harmless, experts say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 09:17 AM
Original message
Chicago Sun-Times: Padilla's 'dirty bomb' harmless, experts say
Hey DUers--spread this around!
http://www.suntimes.com/output/terror/cst-nws-padilla10.html
Padilla's 'dirty bomb' harmless, experts say

June 10, 2004

BY CHARLES J. HANLEY

NEW YORK -- The ''dirty bomb'' allegedly planned by terror suspect Jose Padilla would have been a dud, not the radiological threat portrayed last week by federal authorities, scientists say.

At a June 1 news conference, the Justice Department said the alleged al-Qaida associate hoped to attack Americans by detonating ''uranium wrapped with explosives'' in order to spread radioactivity.

But uranium's extremely low radioactivity is harmless compared with high-radiation matter, such as cesium and cobalt isotopes used in medicine and industry that experts see as potential dirty bomb fuels.

''I used a 20-pound brick of uranium as a doorstop in my office,'' American nuclear physicist Peter D. Zimmerman, of King's College in London, said to illustrate the point.

Zimmerman, co-author of an analysis of dirty bombs for the U.S. National Defense University, said last week's announcement was ''extremely disturbing .... There is just no significant radiation hazard.''

(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. How to Build an Atom Bomb
Worldwide controversy has been generated recently from several court decisions in the United States which have restricted popular magazines from printing articles which describe how to make an atomic bomb. The reason usually given by the courts is that national security would be compromised if such information were generally available.

But, since it is commonly known that all of the information is publicly available in most major metropolitan libraries, obviously the court's officially stated position is covering up a more important factor; namely, that such atomic devices would prove too difficult for the average citizen to construct.

The United States courts cannot afford to insult the vast majorities by insinuating that they do not have the intelligence of a cabbage, and thus the "official" press releases claim national security as a blanket restriction.

The rumors that have unfortunately occurred as a result of widespread misinformation can (and must) be cleared up now, for the construction project this month is the construction of a thermonuclear device, which will hopefully clear up any misconceptions you might have about such a project.

We will see how easy it is to make a device of your very own in ten easy steps, to have and hold as you see fit, without annoying interference from the government or the courts.
http://www.qis.net/~jimjr/misc62.htm

The article first appeared in the Journal of Irreproducible Results, which has been publishing scientific humor and trivia since the 1950s, and Taliban fighters would find this particular parody no more helpful than any of the magazine's other mock science. It advised would-be bomb builders to obtain high-grade plutonium "at your local weapons supplier ... or perhaps the Junior Achievement in your neighborhood ... Wash your hands with soap and warm water after handling the material, and don't allow your children or pets to play in it or eat it."
<snip>
Nevertheless, late last week white-haired BBC reporter John Simpson included footage of the document in a report from the building, along with pictures of left-behind weapons, explosives, hand grenades and even box-cutters. Anthony Lloyd, a reporter from the Times of London also appears to have discovered the document, since he refers to its erroneous instructions about using TNT to create a thermo-nuclear device. "The vernacular quickly spun out of my comprehension but there were phrases through the mass of chemical symbols and physics jargon that anyone could understand," Lloyd wrote. Soon the Times report was being included in articles by the Associated Press.
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11935

Fools, utter fools.
The entire lot of them
(minus the original authors of this most excellent impractical joke.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gee...and
I seem to recall the anodized aluminum tubes the Iraqis were using to process uranium would have to have the anodized coating milled off them to be useful for that purpose

I swear we are being led by Wile E. Coyote

JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, not a dupe of the same article...just the same topic.
A topic that bears repeating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. well, from when I was a mod
(which admittedly i'm not now), a dupe was a dupe if the article, even if from a different newspaper/magazine/tv show was the same as something that was posted earlier.

Your story is from the Chicago Sun-Times. THe other is from the NY Times I believe. Just because they're different news-papers doesn't mean the stories are any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, the first one was better than the ST version...go ahead, mods!
Kill my thread, if you must. But know this: Wherever you go in life...

Okay, now I'm just rambling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Then please add your link and discuss here, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC