Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General promised quick results if Gitmo plan used at Abu Ghraib

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:48 AM
Original message
General promised quick results if Gitmo plan used at Abu Ghraib
The general who pushed for more aggressive interrogation tactics at Iraq (news - web sites)'s Abu Ghraib prison predicted better intelligence within a month if his strategies were adopted, according to a copy of his classified plan obtained by USA TODAY.


In the plan, sent in early September to top military officials in Iraq, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller promised that "a significant improvement in actionable intelligence will be realized within 30 days." His strategy involved having military police acting as prison guards "setting the conditions to exploit internees to respond to questions."


The recommendations in Miller's 12-page report were based on the interrogation operation he supervised at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where suspected members of al-Qaeda are held. The report lists a roster of the 17-person team culled entirely from the Guantanamo operation. The team spent 10 days at Abu Ghraib with Miller in late summer, before he submitted the plan. Several interrogation teams from Guantanamo subsequently trained those at Abu Ghraib.

snip

Miller's plan was not among documents released Tuesday by the White House. Rather, it is part of the classified section of the report prepared by Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who conducted the Army's internal investigation into abuses at Abu Ghraib. Miller, who was not interviewed in that investigation, was subsequently put in charge of all detention and interrogation operations in Iraq.

more

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/generalpromisedquickresultsifgitmoplanusedatabughraib

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. So BushCo knew the torture was Miller's plan...
And their solution was to put him OFFICIALLY IN CHARGE???

Clever.

Okay, I'm giggling again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. General Karpinski specifically cited General Miller in her BBC interview.
NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:08 AM
Original message
I think I can smell a smoking gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. dupe
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 10:10 AM by randr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. guess that "2 inch" stack of papers
that the WH released is a bit deficient in its content.

Miller's plan was not among documents released Tuesday by the White House. Rather, it is part of the classified section of the report prepared by Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, who conducted the Army's internal investigation into abuses at Abu Ghraib. Miller, who was not interviewed in that investigation, was subsequently put in charge of all detention and interrogation operations in Iraq.

and also from the link provided:

In his report to Sanchez, Miller urged that commanders at Abu Ghraib "dedicate and train a detention guard force ... that sets the conditions for the successful interrogation and exploitation of internees/detainees." That guard force, Miller said, should be joined with interrogators under a single commander from military intelligence.

The plan violated long-established military doctrine, which stipulates that military police "do not participate in military-intelligence-supervised interrogation sessions." But Miller told Congress that, with his report, he provided top military officials a list of procedures used at Guantanamo that set limits on the role of MPs in interrogations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good god...
"Ve haf vays of convincing you to talk to us..."

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. What information does the US military
want from 'detainees' that they would allow the grunts to resort to torture? Are these 'detainees' going to tell where the elusive WMDs are located? What is this crucial information that the military requires. Is it anything more than trying to root out the resistance? If this is the purpose then US miltary has gone about a cowardly way using torture and humiliation against people who probably don't have a clue. The grunts end up running the show with zilch results. The US military has descended into the abyss of incompentecy. Our 'brave' soldiers end up just defending themselves, not freedom nor democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. We needed the information that would help Our pResident save face.
It's because bush had stuck his neck out, along with that lovely dick who manages him, and they made their assertions first, and THEN dispatched our boys and girls to go find the evidence to back up their already-issued assertions. It's because bush has his reputation on the line that these people were tortured. And don't forget, up to 90 PERCENT, that's NINE OUT OF EVERY TEN PEOPLE THERE, were simply rounded up in a big dragnet, having been in the wrong place at the wrong time, AND HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH TERRORISM OR THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY PERPETRATE IT. NINE OUT OF EVERY TEN (Red Cross is, I believe, where this statistic came from) were innocent bystanders. INNOCENT. But they were humiliated, terrorized, and tortured anyway, so we could search for something to prop up our straw man here at home.

ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME. Or in this case, bush. It wasn't Gore or Clinton or Kerry or anybody else who insisted, from the get-go, that we had to go wipe out Iraq, and loaded their declarations with a bunch of bogus intel and other crap straight from fantasyland. It was bush and cheney and all the vile neocon serpents slithering around at their feet who were pushing, no. Salivating for war. Masturbating for war.

DAMN them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. we should promise Miller quick results in a war crimes trial
what an ugly man - inside and out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. What information does the US military
want from 'detainees' that they would allow the grunts to resort to torture? Are these 'detainees' going to tell where the elusive WMDs are located? What is this crucial information that the military requires. Is it anything more than trying to root out the resistance? If this is the purpose then US miltary has gone about a cowardly way using torture and humiliation against people who probably don't have a clue. The grunts end up running the show with zilch results. The US military has descended into the abyss of incompentecy. Our 'brave' soldiers end up just defending themselves, not freedom nor democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think it is time
2 put the general on a box w/ a hood over his head and little wires attached 2 his body.

These people found the edge and jump off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, it's not time for that
I won't post what I was about to post. Believe me when I tell you it wasn't very nice.

I'm at the point with this guy that I want him to get double what the worst-tortured prisoner at Abu Ghraib got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Putting morals and ethics aside for the moment, this doesn't make
sense even from a tactical point of view (as Karpinski points out). All this "softening" up of prisoners in an overcrowded, understaffed prison in an active combat zone in an effort to get intelligence was conducted by MPs who don't even speak the language of the prisoners.

If a prisoner had been yelling out the exact latitude and longitude of a WMDs cache would Lynndie England have understood what he was saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC