Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEC declines to rule on f911 ads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:41 PM
Original message
FEC declines to rule on f911 ads
From the moonie times.


FEC declines to rule on anti-Bush film


Washington, DC, Jun. 24 (UPI) -- The Federal Election Commission declined to rule Thursday on whether so-called documentary films are exempt from federal restrictions on political ads.

The FEC' general counsel had recommended filmmakers not be granted a "media exemption" to rules governing political speech, such as that given to broadcast journalists and others. The commissioners declined to take up the issue.

Though the debate focused on the case of filmmaker David Hardy's film, The Rights of the People, the issue of the ads for the Michael Moore film, Fahrenheit 9/11, also comes into play. Moore, an avowed Bush opponent, has made no secret of his desire to see the president defeated in November.

Roll Call said Thursday that commissioners agreed with the general counsel's finding that the proposed advertisements for Hardy's film were "electioneering communications" and could not be paid for with corporate or labor money. "Moreover," the paper said, "if legally funded, such ads would be subject to stringent reporting requirements."

By taking no action on the counsel recommendation to deny the media exemption to filmmakers, it left the issue of Hardy's and Moore's film unresolved. If the FEC had agreed with its general counsel, the paper said, Moore's efforts to advertise his film might have faced restrictions.


http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040624-045850-3520r.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Moore's ads are off the hook??


Yippee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. looks like
because if you think about it, it's a movie and i don't recall wingnuts bitching about wag the dog or primary colors. It's a slippery slope and their being smart about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a confusing report from the Moonie Washington Times!!!
It almost sounds like it is attempting to stir up support
to sanction Moore"s film.

What is your take on this DUrs??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know but what i boils down to
is they are not hearing the case, period. No ruling, just like when the Supreme court decides not to hear a case. So the ads will run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Parts of it seem contradictory, but there does not seem to be any
action from FEC at least for now..... I wonder if there is another legal avenue, since they seemed to bend over backwards to state an opinion that it would fall under election finance law (but are simply not going to act?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. It sounds like
The FCC tried to use Hardy's case to set a precedent. Although, the cases are similar, the dissimilarities outweigh their similarities. (Just guessing here) A finding in Hardy's case, (I'm not aware of all the particulars) would not have been applicable in Moore's case. The reason for the decision to leave it unresolved.

I did hear a little tidbit today, though..Someone had voiced an opinion about foreign film makers not having the same rights, Moore being a Canadian. I wasn't sure of the point they were trying to make. Whether foreign film makers weren't entitled to the same rights as American born filmmakers(?) when screening there films here(?)

At any rate- I'm happy Moore is able to show his film, and shame on anyone that would try to stop him from doing so in the Land of the Free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Moore is American
from Flint Michigan not Canadian, although a Canadian film company released 2 of his films iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, I was listening w/half an ear while they were discussing Moore..
And thinking out loud when I wrote that.
Just trying to disseminate the point they were trying to make.
Thanks, for the reminder though, Moore IS a homeboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And, besides...
...I'm hearing that Canada is refusing to show Moore's film until he retitles it Celsius 488.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. American distributors....

..it would seem to me. It has nothing to do with Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think they were getting at the issue of FOREIGN campaign contributions
which are strictly regulated.... If they chose to regulate F911, the fact that the distributors are Canadian, might have a major impact....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. good point-
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 09:50 PM by Tellurian
They are trying to hook Moore up anyway they can..
By either finding an obscure, ambiguous law/rule or create one to stop Moore.
I believe they will continue searching to stop him.
I don't believe they will let this film run until Nov-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, I think this genie is out of the bottle....
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 09:54 PM by hlthe2b
I am optomistic about Moore's chances and Kerry's for that matter--(fingers tightly crossed).

After this weekend, word-of-mouth will be a very powerful force....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I was really surprised at Terry McAuliff...
He made a very benign comment about the movie on the evening news. And was very nonchalant about it..
He neither mentioned the substance of the film and how it relates nor did he mention the FCC's attempt to stifle the movie.

I'm just wondering if all this hullabaloo is happening because Clinton's movie is coming out soon. I don't know what the pretext will be for trying to stop that movie but it appears that is where this issue is going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Urm...MM is not a Canadian...
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 09:27 PM by mike1963
:eyes:
edit: well I should have read the whole thread...sorry to those who pointed it out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. That was news to me
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 10:22 PM by nu_duer
My mom, who hates that she likes bush, has told me several times that MM is from Canada, usually by saying something like, "who the hell is he to say "Dude, Where's My Country" when he's from Canada?"

I don't know where she heard this, tho she watches faux, but I knew no different until I read this thread.

The right, damn, they have no problem with lying, and lying large, and lying a lot - no qualms whatsoever. I wonder if "scum" is too strong a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovenicepeople Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I wish!
Being Canadian I would be so proud.I put Mr. Moore right behind Frank Zappa as one of my favorite Americans,don't worry most of you folks are on my list to.As for Chimpminister Fooler: DUMB ALLOVER(a little ugly on the side!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm confised why people complain
about the 527's (mostly wingnuts) they were complaining about restricitng free speech, so they said no election ads unless your a canidate for 60 days before the general election and 30 before a primary.

so I guess that means no more 527 ads after September 4th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC