Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drug bill lacks safeguard on Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:17 AM
Original message
Drug bill lacks safeguard on Social Security
Congressional Democratic leaders yesterday said the Medicare prescription-drug bill passed last year could limit future Social Security benefits, and some charged that it was a deliberate effort by Republicans to set the stage for partially privatizing the federal retirement program.

"Seniors' Social Security cost-of-living adjustments and benefits are under attack from Republicans," said Rep. Pete Stark, California Democrat. "This is one more step in the Republicans' plan to ignore Social Security benefits and try to privatize it. ... This is terrorism enacted against our seniors."

Mr. Stark, a member of the House Joint Economic Committee, issued a report illustrating how deductions in Social Security payments to cover Medicare prescription-drug benefits (Part D benefits) have no safeguards against inflation, unlike deductions for doctors' care (Part B premiums).

The Part D deductions, the report says, will outpace cost-of-living increases applied annually to Social Security benefits by 2007. The deductions for Part B premiums are under a "hold-harmless" rule to prevent them from rising above the COLA

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040722-121146-8513r.htm

It is hard to believe that here I am for the second time this week posting a Moonie Times article which is unfavorable to BushCo. What is going on with the Loonie Moonie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do think the COL thing is off on SS
It is done in a percent which is silly as mine is low as I get little but if you get top dollar you get a lot more. The bread and milk for me goes up just as much as the people on the higher end.Should be a flat fee and that would help on low end and the govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, COLA numbers are kept low on purpose
because the government doesn't want to pay out fair increases to Social Security, government bond issues and government workers. Instead of reporting the true cost of living increases, they fudge the numbers. They are saving that money to give tax cuts to the rich and subsidies to drug companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC