New Study Reveals Gaping Holes in Mad Cow 'Firewall', Says Center for Progressive Regulation; McGarity: 'Government's So-Called Firewalls Are Flimsy'; Administration's Sham Safeguards Don't Protect Public Health'
WASHINGTON, July 22 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Thomas O. McGarity, a food safety expert and president of the Center for Progressive Regulation, today derided the Bush Administration's response to the threat of Mad Cow disease in the U.S. beef supply, concluding that the series of regulatory measures taken to date "are riddled with sham safeguards and faux firewalls that fail to protect public health." In particular, McGarity described USDA Secretary Ann Veneman's recent assertion that USDA regulations for identifying and banning highly infective "specified risk materials" (SRMs) "ensures that the highest-risk materials are not entering the food chain" as based "more on fiction than fact." McGarity's assessment came upon the release of CPR's 160- page analysis of the Administration's Mad Cow regulatory regime, "Flimsy Firewalls: The Continuing Triumph of Efficiency over Safety in Regulating Mad Cow Disease Risks," written by McGarity with fellow CPR Member Scholar Frank Ackerman.
A key finding of McGarity's research is that because of a significant loophole in the government's regulations concerning handling of especially risky SRMs from slaughtered cattle -- brains, ganglia, and other body parts that can spread Mad Cow disease -- troubling practices are now both legal and widespread in the beef slaughter and processing industry. The loophole permits industry to elect not to implement the rigorous standards for specific controls at specific points in processing, simply by asserting -- as almost all establishments apparently have -- that Mad Cow disease is unlikely to be a problem in their facility. After reaching that conclusion on their own, and without government approval, industry is then allowed to follow far less rigorous industry-drafted Standard Operation Procedures, sometimes called "prerequisite" programs, to keep brain, spinal cord and the like out of edible meat. They are not required to actually check for Mad Cow. The failings of this system are potentially disastrous, and include:
(more)
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=113-07222004