Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Head up, watch for announcement re Saudi troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:11 PM
Original message
Head up, watch for announcement re Saudi troops


MSNBC Lester Holt was interviewing a retired military officer who said negotiations are going on that would bring in the Saudi troops to relieve the American troops...and to some extent, Jordanian and a few Turkish troops could be involved. Announcement to be made in time for election? Bringing troops home....re-elect Bush! Are those Saudis friends, or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saudis aren't as well trained
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Not to mention...
...the fact that the Saudi military aren't exactly the most upstanding people in the world. As a matter of fact, they have a distinct reputation for corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Asia Times is saying the same thing about the Russians
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FG27Ak01.html

Do not be surprised to see three or four divisions of the Russian army in the Sunni triangle before year-end, with an announcement just prior to the US presidential election in November. Long rumored (or under negotiation), a Russian deployment of 40,000 soldiers was predicted on July 16 by the US intelligence site www.stratfor.com, and denied by the Russian Foreign Ministry on July 20. Nonetheless, the logic is compelling. Russian support for US occupation forces would make scorched earth of Senator John Kerry's attack on the Bush administration's foreign policy, namely its failure to form effective alliances. For Russian President Vladimir Putin, the chance to make scorched earth of Fallujah is even more tempting.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sending troops to Iraq would weaken Putin
After the Soviet experience in Afghanistan, and the ongoing deaths coming out of Chechnya, there is no way he'll be sending troops to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That doesn't mean the Powell & Co
isn't going around begging everybody and his brother to send troops. Or that they aren't spreading these stories to make people think that they can still pull together a coalition. They are so desperate at this point, they would even try to broker a deal with the devil himself, if he would send troops to Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. A joke or what, the Russian guarding 14 U.S. military installations
being build. While junior brings the troops home. Who's kidding who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well hell he took Iraq over for them...
So they may as well be on site to make sure the whole damn place just turns into an extension of their shitty country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The Saudi's can demonstrate how a Beheading is really done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. BTW did you guys know
That fat ass "bandar bush" is the son of the Saudi defense minister?

Unger and Moore have this situation dead to rights IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think that if Saudi troops leave Saudi Arabia
That they will go right back to deal with the insurrection. This is possibly a planted story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes they are, friends of the Carlyle Group and Dubya's dad...
...With the crap that is taking place in Iraq right now, I just pray that our troops can keep their heads down and they stay out of harms way until they can be safely brought home. This entire Iraq/Afghanistan adventure by George W Bush has been a complete failure, although our troops have performed exquisitely. Given the fact that they were sent into harms way under false premises it should be our duty to get them home as soon as possible and as safely as possible. Let the Saudis and other Middle Eastern powers take the hit of straightened out the Al Quida mess! Oh, they can also start paying for it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Performed exquisitely?
The entire operation was and is a war crime perpetrated against a large number of international laws, treaties and conventions.

Then some at Abu Ghraib were given blatantly illegal orders to torture prisoners, most of whom had been rounded up without probable cause other than they were Iraqi males, and these soldiers "performed" this on them "exquisitely" and they were "just following orders."

But that's okay because WE ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OUR FUHRER SPEAKS TO GOD AND GOD SPEAKS THROUGH HIM. And the rest of the world can either bow in submission to the Unholy Chimp or go pound sand. Don't kid yourself. The vast majority of the soldiers still believe Commander-in-Chimp is God. Mind control techniques have been perfected on them or we would never have gotten this far into this mess.

Gawd, I am sick of this nonsense. Calling good evil and evil good. When will it ever end?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I find it hard to believe the Saudi Royals would risk that level of
cooperation with the U.S. while the anti-American sentiments are so strong in the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. That's correct
Saudi Royals would bring the full wrath of the extremeists (which they spawned) down upon themselves and risk loss of the empire if they were seen closely cooperating with the "infidels".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Cooperating with the "infidels" and perceived "zionsts",
That'll play well in the Saudi heartland...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well if they hold true to form,
they will ANNOUNCE it just before the election, but then it will never actually happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. my thoughts exactly n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. this is spooge
If Saudi troops come to Iraq, it's civil war time all over again...AND the Saudis get the OSAM thing back.

Remember, we're there to "protect the oil fields," and we ain't leaving any time soon.

Or at least until oil hits $75 a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. The worst of all possible moves
Talk about poking a stick into a hornet's nest, putting Saudi troops in to occupy Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. If they pull this shit and expect them too
they need a well placed anonymous source to start bringing out the true/not true medicated president story. Hey even if it's a rumor it needs to be dispelled considering he only told the US about the drunk driving 5 days before the election and the fact that his military records are so screwed up. The people should know well ahead of the election so everyone knows it's about the facts not partisan politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Russian story about troops could be true if Putin is returning the
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 05:14 PM by Dover
favor. I think the U.S. backed off on Chechnya when Putin was up for election and I believe Baker has been over their 'helping' with elections. Also, remember that Russia was invited to be a 'witness' to our own 2000 elections.

So it's not entirely out of the question that Russia might help the Bushies out a bit.

And we know the Saudi Royals WOULD if the could. Just don't know that they can afford to do it with the tensions in their region.

And who knows what other backroom deals have been made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. related article: Saudi Arabia Proposes Islamic Force in Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21736-2004Jul28.html

JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia, July 28 --In talks with Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Saudi Arabia today proposed the creation of an Islamic force to help stabilize Iraq and potentially someday replace at least some of the U.S.-led military coalition, according to senior Arab diplomats here.

At a joint press conference with Powell, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud Faisal confirmed that the proposal is now on the table but refused to provide specifics until further discussions with Powell over a working dinner.

But a senior State Department official traveling with Powell reacted positively to the initial idea. "We're interested. It could be useful. We have to flush it out," he said. He described it as a "supplemental force."

The Saudi government also talked today with Iraq's interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, who is also visiting the kingdom, about the prospects for a new Islamic force. Saudi Arabia and Iraq agreed today to restore relations and reopen embassies in each other's capitals.

Saudi Arabia has been involved in behind-the-scenes diplomacy for at least two weeks exploring the possibility of a force from Muslim nations. Saud held talks recently with U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan in Vienna to discuss specifics. The current coalition of 31 countries has U.N. approval.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Tom Brokaw just reported...
Tom B. just reported the same thing...mark my words, even if DUers think it is improbable, it the only way out for the Repubs this election...to convince some country to take over so that a large portion of the troops come home....definite announcement plans just before the election. If it happens, I am glad for our troops, sad for the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. then it will be up to us to remind everyong
of Iran and Syria, North Korea and China - oh yeah, wasn't Russia on the PNACer's list too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Then, after the election U.S. troops can head back to Iraq
And also to Saudi Arabia, since the House of Saud will need the House of Bush to prop it up, after enraging public opinion at home. It is just...diabolical on the part of BFEE/PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. And my contention is that really all they need is
the APPEARANCE of having convinced another country to "take over".

it is ALL PR with these guys. Keep yourself available in October... we will have a lot of PR to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. What PRICE all these favors? I'm afraid they continue to sell us
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 05:37 PM by Dover
down the river for their own personal power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Saudis?
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 05:49 PM by teryang
given the power struggle in Saudi Arabia for control of the regime and the domestic terrorism there, sending troops will just be one further step in destabilizing the regime.

Their leadership couldn't possibly that stupid, could they?

I would expect Putin to make promises and then not deliver. That way he gets a weakening, corrupt and badly led America continuing in a downward spiral. He won't pay the price. He'll take as much as he can get and give as little as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lottie244 Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hey, the Saudi people trying to overthrow the monarchy won't care about
their military being killed in Iraq. Makes them weaker at home. Maybe they can overthrow their dictators while the military is in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. lessee now. the vast majority of the 9-11 highjackers were Saudi and none
were Iraqi. but we invaded Iraq because of 9-11, and now we're enlisting the Saudis help.

makes sense in the black-is-white, up-is-down world of gw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not going to happen.
There is no way the Saudi Sunni army is going to be allowed into Iraq by the Iraqi Shiite majority. You want to see violence and bloodshed, then get a load of what happens when Saudis occupy Iraq.

No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. Oh the irony!
In '91 we were defending the Saudis from the supposed invasion by Iraq.

In '03 we invade Iraq, and then hand the keys over the Saudis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. The question still remains "Why now?"
This would be a bit too obvious: People will want to know why Bush didn't have the Saudis in his coalition at the outset. They will also wonder why Bush waited so long and, had he acted sooner, how many American soldier's lives would have been saved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. Nonsense
We didn't grab the Iraqi oil fields just to turn them over to the Saudis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
35. Major diversionary story....lull the trusting souls to sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaryL Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Eeeeeuuuuuuwwwwww!
Can you say insurrection? If the Turks so much as set foot in Iraq the Kurds will go nuts. This has got to be a load of BS unless the goal is to have Iraq go completely up in flames. They may bring in a few thousand but that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC