Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court rejects Commandments case (Roy Moore is still fired)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:05 PM
Original message
Supreme Court rejects Commandments case (Roy Moore is still fired)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1154&slug=Scotus%20Ten%20Commandments

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from ousted Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore, who lost his job after defying a federal order to dismantle a Ten Commandments monument.

A federal judge ruled that Moore violated the Constitution's ban on government promotion of religion when he placed the monument in the rotunda of the judicial building in the middle of the night in 2001.

Moore's lawyers had called on the Supreme Court to "remedy this travesty of justice" and give him his job back. The high court declined, without comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd scream dupe
except I didn't post this in LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. These idiots!
These people have every right to post the Ten Commandments in their homes, on their windows, in their yards, on the side of their cars, in front of their churches, and in the businesses they own. They could get together with nine of their neighbors and post one Commandment each like Burma Shave signs if they really wanted the keep them in the public's eye.

So why the f*** don't they? They insist on posting them on PUBLIC property because they know it's illegal. They know the government must object, thus making the government look anti-God and ant-religion. Mission Accomplished!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's what I don't understand. The government isn't closing churches.
They aren't being oppressed. Why can't they accept the fact that they don't have the right to ram their religion down the throats of others?

Please see the first amendment, morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Their objectives run much deeper
and are much more sinister. They need to get the government behind their religion if they're ever going to have the theocracy they crave. This, for me, is the really frightening thing that's been going on in the United States for the last 30 years or so. It's been hidden behind various smokescreens and misdirections, but there is a strong, well-entrenched and growing movement towards theocracy in your country.

Read about Dominionism, the theocratic ambitions of the Religious Right, and especially "The Constitution Restoration Act of 2004" at the Yurica Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I think there's even a higher order of sinister going on here
I'm currently having loads of fun researching the ties between the Religious Right and those Straussian neocons that infest Washington. I haven't tied all the ends together, but at this point I'm pretty convinced that at least some of the leadership of the "Religious Right" are themselves followers of Leo Strauss, and are cynically advancing his scheme of pious untruths to control the masses, power and will unbounded by morality for the unbelieving elite.

They aren't trying to build a theocracy. They're trying to build a fascist state where a nonbelieving group of ubermenschen intentionally dupe the rest of the population with a made-up, heavily legalistic and moralistic, religion. I can see how so many of the founding neocons were once Trotskyists -- this is Marx's admonition about religion, turned on it's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You're right!
They won't stop until they get a government-sanctioned religion -- their religion, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. AMEN to that, GOPFighter.
They want to tell everyone who believes and acts differently from them that they'd damned well get in line and get out of their road, they're taking over.

I think Moore sees his undereducated, disenfranchised, alienated poor white supporters as sheep waiting to be fleeced. He undoubtedly thinks he can manage an ignorant, superstitious version of a grass roots movement to steer them toward the authority they believe they deserve with him driving the herd! What a moran.

http://www.theage.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1068674387261_2003/11/14/15JUDGE_REU,0.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Moore could probably even get away with...
...hanging them up in his chambers. Putting up a five ton granite sculpture in the rotunda of the Alabama courthouse? He was clearly just trying to pick a fight and further his personal ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. How can you have a real Theocracy unless you merge
church and state? That is what they are after
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. precisely.

It's nothing but a political motivation tactic, designed to induce a predictable legal response that can then be used to whip the fundies into a paranoid frenzy. "ahhhh! they're going to ban the bible!" "ahhhh! they're going to arrest me for saying a prayer!" "aaahhhhh!! if I don't vote Republican, the evil secular humanist communist devil-worshipping conspiracy will come after me!!!" "ahhhhh!!!!!!!"

<insert sound of 10 million paranoid fundamentalists rushing off to the polls>

<insert sound of Republican strategists laughing at their gullible predictability>


MDN




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess "Duck Blind Justice" Scalia couldn't corral 3 others to agree
to hear this case. Pity. I was kind of hoping for a major smackdown of Little Roy after some entertaining oral arguments featuring "Duck Blind Justice" Scalia and "Me Too Tony" Clarence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trapper914 Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cowards.
The Supreme Court needs to, once and for all, rule on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. In a way, they did
perhaps the majority feels the federal judge who dismissed the case was right in his ruling--which he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Roy Moore is a thinker?
Please explain this. He's a nutcase.

RTP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. yep, he's a thinker all right

as in:

"I think I can become a right-wing celebrity by playing games with the Constitution"

"I think the religious right is too ignorant and paranoid to appreciate WHY we keep the government out of the religion business"

"I think I can leverage my self-made martyr status into a tool for personal and political advancement"

"I think if I use the Ten Commandments to do this, nobody will dare to question my motives"

"I think I can get away with it"

"I think it'll make me a bigshot on the far right"

"I think it's the perfect scam"


Yep, that's Roy Moore: always thinking.


MDN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. what?!?
'Moore's lawyers had called on the Supreme Court to "remedy this travesty of justice" and give him his job back. The high court declined, without comment.'

Justice? what drugs are they on? That made me sick.

Supreme Court, I applause you for making a such good decision on that ridiculous case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes, and I think this is different than not accepting the case!
Since SCOTUS accepted the case, their decline to restore Moore is a definite decision against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. The only 'travesty of justice' is Moore himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC