Three articles I've read just this morning -
Court delays touch-screen enforcement
Disabled voters had sought more of the machines before Nov. 2.By STEVE PATTERSON and PAUL PINKHAM
The Times-Union
A federal appeals court decided Tuesday to delay enforcement of a court order requiring Duval County's elections office to install more touch-screen voting machines for disabled voters.
To a large degree, the decision makes meaningless a lawsuit the American Association of People with Disabilities filed in 2001 to force the purchase of machines that are more accessible to blind or manually disabled people.
But a judge could still hear arguments Thursday asking for the Supervisor of Elections Office to be held in contempt for announcing last week it would not have the machines in place for the Nov. 2 general election.
Working from his Jacksonville office, U.S. District Judge Henry Adams scheduled the contempt hearing about the same time that the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was issuing its ruling in Atlanta.
A lawyer for the disabled voters, Ari Rothman, filed papers late Tuesday arguing the contempt hearing was still necessary. Earlier, his law firm filed a motion that claimed the elections office "wasted at least a full week by refusing to make even a good effort attempt to procure the machines and train poll workers."
http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/100604/met_16830068.shtml---
High court to review voting rights
With the election less than a month away, the Florida Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit demanding that all provisional ballots be counted regardless of where they are cast.BY GARY FINEOUT
gfineout@herald.com
TALLAHASSEE - Many of Florida's voters may still get a chance to use a paper ballot on Election Day, thanks to a long-shot lawsuit that has rocketed forward to the state's highest court.
By a razor-thin margin, the Florida Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to take up a lawsuit challenging the law that overhauled the state's election system after the chaotic 2000 presidential election.
Justices voted to hold a hearing on the lawsuit on Oct. 13, setting up the possibility that they could order election supervisors to make substantial changes to Florida's election system days before voters head to the polls on Nov. 2.
A coalition of unions, including the AFL-CIO, want the court to order election supervisors to count so-called provisional ballots regardless of where the voter turned them in.
>snip<
But the caveat added by state legislators is that provisional ballots must be discarded if the voter didn't go to the right precinct. Lawyers for the unions say this violates Florida's Constitution, which requires only that voters cast their ballots in their home county.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/9845253.htm?1c---
and finally, this one, which is a pretty good wrap-up of the ongoing insanity in FL.---
Preelection legal challenges aboundBy Dara Kam
Special to The Palm Beach Post
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
TALLAHASSEE — Civil rights groups, organized labor and Democrats intensified pressure Tuesday on Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood to further open elections, now just 27 days away.
The American Civil Liberties Union threatened to take Hood to court over her directive to elections supervisors regarding incomplete voter registration applications. A coalition including the ACLU demanded action regarding manual recounts for touch-screen voting systems. And the Florida Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments in a challenge from labor unions over provisional ballots.
Meanwhile, Gov. Jeb Bush issued an executive order Tuesday night giving elections supervisors the ability to send absentee ballots by forwardable mail in counties where "a significant number of voters" are unable to occupy their residence as a result of one of the four hurricanes. Without Bush's order, state law requires that absentee ballots be sent by non-forwardable mail that must be returned if not deliverable.Palm Beach Post article with a Very long URL---
If they don't like the rules, they just change them as they go along. If the law is to their benefit, it MUST be enforced and they scream 'Rule of Law'. They fight accountability and claim everything is fine with no accountability.
This quote from the last article cited is about as hypocritical as they get-
"The law is very specific on what it requires," Hood's spokeswoman, Jenny Nash, said Tuesday. "The Department of State cannot decide that it will ignore the law because it will be the least-criticized decision." - but they sure as hell just ignore or change them if it's to their benefit. :grr:
FL 2000 seems like child's play in hindsight. FL 2004 is looking like it's being set up to become the fiasco to end all fiascos.
So as far as this below 50% approval poll goes, and as much as I hate all these polls, I think it's a very important development. If news like this continues to be reported and the polls continue to show *jr dropping, won't a black-box touchscreen 'win' in FL be harder to explain?