Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's mystery bulge (Salon.com)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:27 AM
Original message
Bush's mystery bulge (Salon.com)
Let me know if someone already posted this.

Bush's mystery bulge

The rumor is flying around the globe. Was the president wired during the first debate?

Oct. 8, 2004 | Was President Bush literally channeling Karl Rove in his first debate with John Kerry? That's the latest rumor flooding the Internet, unleashed last week in the wake of an image caught by a television camera during the Miami debate. The image shows a large solid object between Bush's shoulder blades as he leans over the lectern and faces moderator Jim Lehrer.

The president is not known to wear a back brace, and it's safe to say he wasn't packing. So was the bulge under his well-tailored jacket a hidden receiver, picking up transmissions from someone offstage feeding the president answers through a hidden earpiece? Did the device explain why the normally ramrod-straight president seemed hunched over during much of the debate?

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me finish!
He was talking to Rove, I guess. Does this constitute cheating, by the agreed rules of the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
38. if you blow that up in Photoshop,
you can see the trail of the cord running up to his right ear - and see the line at the base of his hair.

Looks like a wire to me.

I was also curious when he stated (at the beginning of speaking) "Let me finish" as no one else was talking or had questioned him or interrupted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. You can also see the cord running up his shoulder
He needs to be blasted on this. Lying, cheating BASTARD!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
66. That's his hotline to God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #66
161. LOL!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
83. Here is the blown up image
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
79. Lighter shot of his bulge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
94. 'Man-ssiere'
or 'Bro' if you prefer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
124. up until now, i thought someone had done a photoshop job on it
since the explanation for it seems aloof, why won't they just tell us what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
125. up until now, i thought someone had done a photoshop job on it
since the explanation for it seems aloof, why won't they just tell us what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackywill Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #125
140. While watching the debate with my son I said
"looks like Bush is wearing a bullet proof vest". We made a couple of jokes about it but gave it no more consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadioFlyer Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
149. It looks like...
...a bulletproof vest to me. Battery packs for wireless mikes go at the beltline in the back, not in the middle of the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #149
171. but this is not a wireless mic
I have worn them and thought the same thing. However if this is a wirless receiver he would not have wanted to wear it in front for fear it could be seen when his jacket gapped open. However the wire would then have to run up over his shoulder to be aimed at the little ear piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #171
172. Isn't that what looks to be snaking up his right shoulder in the picture?
A wire, I mean, aimed at the ear piece. :shrug: Not that it helped him much. So,... Here's to an encore Wednesday night! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
78. May that bulge
is just his folded up bat wings. Wonder how he hides his horns though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
84. Of course it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
153. dere aint nodamn rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
162. Here is the ear piece, an 'earwig'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. If that's how he performs when he's receiving assistance...
then he, and the United States, is worse off than I thought.
:scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It was *superb* assistance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Hey patsified, guess what? I have an autograph by Patsy Cline.
I am showing my age here, but back in the 60's, my family and I went to all the country and western shows. My mother kept an autograph book that we added to each one we went to. I have Patsy, Jim Reeves, Kitty Wells, Johnny Cash, Buck Owens, Cowboy Copas, Marty Robbins, Little Jimmie Dickens etc, etc, etc. I have the book stored in a special frame that hangs on my wall, open, of course to the autograph of the immortal Patsy Cline. What a wonder she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
64. Me too!
I'm not really into country music too much, I came to Patsy thru her pop side. She could do everything... sure was one of a kind!

(Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.);)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is the pic
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 10:32 AM by shpongled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am also wondering about the "mystery bulge" in his flight suit.
I don't think it was a radio transmitter, but it certainly wasn't his, er, shriveled, raisin-like anatomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. ROFLMAO! that is a mystery bulge! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
51. Is this the one you are talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. Is that a roll of toilet paper in your crotch
Or are you just happy to see us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
87. so that's where he stashed his airsickness bag!
There's been speculation at DU over Georgie being reluctant to fly because of fear issues. But somehow I assumed that he would have left his used barf bags on the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #87
146. The mundane explanation--
http://www.liberalslant.com/wdj052003.htm

"Look at the tough way he walks - no, dare I say - struts across the flight deck! What a guy! What a real man!" Yeah, well you'd "strut" like that too if you were too stupid to release your parachute harness crotch straps like the other real pilots did. Oh well, c'est la vie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
130. LOL!!! Good Photo!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
142. Upon closer inspection...
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 07:04 PM by Concerned GA Voter
Bush's mystery bulge IS IN FACT Karl Rove. Look at this picture where I enlarged the area in question:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
63. that was Karen Huge's head n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
163. lol ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's Cheney's hand! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
133. LOL Good one!!! n/t
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. I sit possible that he could have performed that badly WITH HELP?
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 10:34 AM by tom_paine
Possible, but that would mean Karl Rove is far more cruel than he is intelligent and animal cunning.

sadly, my opinion is that he shares those traist in equal measure.

But it certainly is withing the level of Orwellian Corruption displayed by his Imperial Stooges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Does seem hard to believe but...
there is actually audio out there where you can hear a voice giving him his lines. A CNN (i believe) camera accidentally picked up the signal and broadcast it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. that could be faked
i'm sorry to say it, but it could be. if it was a prerocorded report, why wouldn't that audio have been caught?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. There is audio... (link provided)
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 11:03 AM by zzapatista
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noisefloor Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
80. Most likely an error from the audio engineers desk
I just watched the video clip with the double voice, as a person in the audio/video production industry. My opinion is what we heard was a telephone feed to the main production studio from the remote location.
There is a satellite delay when broadcasting over that kind of distance and often an additional delay to keep things in sync and on time for the broadcast. The producers were probably communicating by phone through the audio production desk (so everyone involved can hear), and they simply did not mute the phone line and accidentally broadcasted both audio feeds together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. Possible, but after three listens I disagree.

The electronic voice had a different timbre and a different rythm. Pauses were in different places. Didn't recognise the voice, but I haven't heard rove's voice often. Wasn't cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #88
173. ti is his voice reading the speech to himself
so that he is just repeating himself. That way he understands and can not mistake what is being said.
I have often wondered about his halting speaking style. I also wondered why he was willing to speak in public and seemed to get better at is sometime in his 2nd year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #80
97. I listened MANY times.. it's not the same words..
.. Bush added an "and" and a "well", I believe. I listened to it yesterday, and the pauses were different, and he added a few qualifiers. It was taken live.. so I think somehow it got picked up on the mic.. It's not the same person, doesn't have the drawl. Sounded like cheney, actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #97
165. yup, different words and it sounded like cheney. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
71. Do you have the link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Bad Reception?
During some of those long pauses he sure looked as if he was straining
to hear something. I think that his "help" may have been inaudible some
of the time, leaving him to flop about helplessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
164. it's called 'aphasia'. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InhaleToTheChief Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Link with lots of info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Who is this Ted guy?
http://www.cannonfire.blogspot.com/

A poster to another blog relayed what he felt was an additional piece of evidence that Bush used an off-camera advisor:

...during the part of the debate about Kim Jung Il, Bush addressed someone named "Ted". Who is this "Ted" that Bush was talking to? ...This would be explained if Bush had an earpiece and was speaking to his "handler".

Is this true? I checked the MSNBC transcript of the debate and could find no reference to a "Ted." However, the transcriber might well have glided over a seeming non-sequitur.


Can anybody who has some free time on their hands check some of the video of the debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great article...
But I really wonder what the backlash would be if it came out that he would be cheating on the debate. Actually, I'm wondering about the law when it comes to this. Could he be punished for this? Or would it just be something to change the minds of voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. The republicans would laud him ....
say he's smart 'nough to know he's stupid, and courageous enough to "do sompin about it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InhaleToTheChief Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Another link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
136. Hmmm
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. This needs to be forwarded to the major news media
the issue isn't so much that he needed help (and STILL did so badly), but that he may have broken the rules of the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. I sent this package to Keith Olbermann this morning ..
feel free to sent it to your favourite messengers
Letter to Keith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
145. Keith brought it up this evening.
He asked one of the talking Bushites about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InhaleToTheChief Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. Personally, I think it could be devastating to him...
If definitive proof comes out, this could be his death blow. Like if someone captures actual earpiece audio at the next debate (or the last one for that matter). Legality aside, it makes George looks like the petty liar that he is in a simple way that all Americans can understand. Forget the WMD stuff, the guy can't even talk on his own despite all the blustering about "You know exactly where I stand".

Do, YOU know where you stand, George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xyboymil Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. It certainly looks looks like a receiver but could it be a bullet proof..
vest? Trauma plates almost always sit on the front of a bullet proof vest but some have manufactured ones on the backs as well.

Could it be that?

Christ Almighty! As bad as he did at the 1st debate, can you imagine how he would have done without advice being piped into his ear??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I'd agree but damn there's actually audio out there where you can hear the
phantom voice in his ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
48. Then why didn't Kerry have one?


He is just as important as Bush.

If they were in a secured area, Bush would not need one if Kerry did not.

It does not hardly look like one to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
100. Probably because it was Bush's idea and not necessary
Given that this is the first time in four years that he's been in front of people who haven't pledged loyalty to him, he was probably terrified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #100
117. That's what had him rolling his eyes and jumping
up and down like he had just pissed his pants. Afraid of anybody he can't totally control!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
110. These guys spend HUGE amounts of money to look good
in front of the camera. I cannot believe Shrubby's image consultant would have allowed this to go by, unless he had something under his jacket that very few people were supposed to know about...and his IC wasn't one of them.

I didn't notice anything like that on Cheney after the VP debates were over, and there was an opportunity to see his back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #110
168. bush was dictating the rules and
there was a rule that there not be any video, photographs of their backs. evidently, someone overrode the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. Actually, Bush's masters have reached such a point of desperation
that they have to strap an explosive device on him to force him to perform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
52. LOL
Works for me. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why did he say, "Let me finish"?
His time was not up and no one was telling him to hurry....VERY suspicious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. The best result may be forcing him to not use an earpiece tonight.
He has been using this scheme for every public appearance in 4 years. It will be just another thing that he hasn't had to deal with until the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MARALE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think he was wired, but
It didn't work very well. That is why he looked pissed and lost a lot of the time. I think he was relying on that when he went to debate, but somehow the signal was garbled. He had to perform on mostly his own intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. He sure kept ACTING as though he was wired
Especially when he cocked his head as if he were listening to something else, as I've seen him do many times. It's been suggested that since an earplug would be too obvious, something's been implanted in his ear. Also, keep in mind the that Bush camp did not have complete control of the facilities this time. What if the hearing device simply didn't work, kept sputtering in and out, thus leaving him on his own?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArnoldLayne Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
28. That's pretty sad he can't think enough to
give his own answers to questions asked to him. He has to rely on somebody off stage to feed him the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. I've been thinking about this, so many questions.
Assuming, just assuming, Idiot King is wired (and I do have my doubts). I would think this would light the fire of fear under his handlers. How will they respond in tonight's debate?

Will they remain undeterred and attempt to continue wiring Shrub but try to cover all their tracks (and bulges) a little more thoroughly?

Will they realize it's not worth the trouble and turn him loose on his own?

Why on earth did he perform so badly in the first debate if in fact he was wired? That is the source of my skepticism. I can't imagine the puppeteer sitting there in the wings repeating "it's hard work" into Shrub's ear over and over. Were there technical problems? Did Shrub suddenly find the safety net ripped?

I would think that wires and bulges can be much more conspicuous in tonight's debate format. The two candidates are in a free-form floating environment, nothing to hide behind. We shall see.

Eyes are watching.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. tonights debate/town hall style he has the question ahead
of time. IIRC, the questions by 'the people' have been prescreened and approved. the candidates have them ahead of time and can prepare campaign speaches. It should not be called a debate in my opinion.

The bloggers have been following the wire story. There were some pics of an ear piece, another with the rectangular box between the shoulder blades and more disturbing are comments about his debating skills 10 years ago. It has been suggested that his debating skills 10 years ago were strong and he is degenerating. The hypothesis is that he has a pre-alzhiemers dimentia. :shrug:

If they are right, no amount of prep on the questions will help him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Prescreened?
Wow, I didn't know that.

You're right, if that is the case, this event tonight has NO business being called a "debate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
115. None of them should be called debates.
The format bears no resemblance even to what high school debate teams do, much less to the Lincoln-Douglas debates, etc. More like a joint press conference, or some such. Hubby said he heard one pundit or columnist say that they should be referred to as "The Presidential Presentations".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #36
61. That is NOT what Charlie Gibson said this morning.
He said that HE (Charlie) would see the questions early today, and pick out the ones to be used, but that neither candidate would see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
81. Thanks!
So the moderator sees the questions. That's much better. Thanks for the clarification.

Hope Charlie picks equally tough questions for both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wackywill Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #81
141. I heard that Charlie was given 140
questions this morning and has to wittle them down to 20 for the "debate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
92. my understanding is that questions are NOT pre-screened...
...and that the moderator won't even know what they are until just prior to the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #92
99. They will be prescreened
But I don't know how much in advance and I don't think the candidates will know what they are. If an audience member deviates from their screened question they will be interrupted. It's to try and raise the quality of the questions and to prevent hecklers. Hopefully they will still be hard-hitting questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #99
120. yes, prescreened in that sense....
NPR did a story on this this AM and reported that audience members will arrive with questions and that will be the first that anyone has seen their questions, but that the moderator is charged with "screening" to insure that a balanced selection of questions is asked, i.e. 20 variations on "Why are you such a lame-assed wanker, Mr Bush?" will not be allowed. The report emphasized that the CANDIDATES will not have any prior knowledge of the questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
98. No.. the candidates don't have the question... unless they cheated.
The askers are chosen by Gallup (yah, them!), to be people that were "soft"on their candidate of choice. Because Gallup sayz that no one is undecided anymore.. that they chose people who have chosen THEIR candidate, but said they may be interested in the other candidate. Sounds like bullshit to me.. since the freeper types have perfected that rap already.. pretending to be a Kerry supporter that likes Bush.

Anyhoo... The questions are all written by the askers. They are prescreened by Charlie Gibson and he chooses which ones to let them ask. The askers have to be ready to jump up and ask, as they have no idea whose questions will be approved to use. The mics will cut off immediately after the question is asked, so the asker cannot clarify or ask a follow up. I think that is kind of bullshit.. as Kerry likes to ask questions to clarify what is being asked.. as in a TOWN HALL MEETING FORMAT, perhaps (oh, the irony).

So.. supposedly only Gibson sees the questions. He gets to choose which ones are asked (which is kind of bullshit). I don't know anything about Gibson.. I assume he's your typical lightweight morning talk show guy? Any proof of bias either way??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #98
116. So, how much of a Mediawhore is this Gibson guy? Does he fellate Chimpy on
a regular basis, as most of them do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
137. Pre-senile dementia
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
76. Those devices that jam cell phones - could something like that have
interfered? heh heh heh, let us hope so.

Didn't DUer Stephanie post a year or so that she could actually hear some audio coming from the pResident at an appearance or something.

We know they use the ear piece. And we know he has access to all the top secret toys in the US arsenal. They stole the election in 2000; do not doubt they would cheat in a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachi Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. Ramrod straight, my ass. He has the barroom lean working for him
any time he is near a podium. I know, I have the lean working for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
31. Will the media talk about this "crazy rumor"?
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 10:58 AM by onehandle
If this was Kerry, they'd be all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. Pics of the earpiece he uses. (edited)
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 11:10 AM by zzapatista
Edit: can't get pic to work but go here
http://www.cannonfire.blogspot.com/
and scroll down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. This link is broken, and I'm really interested! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #35
55. here is the link to the photo.....
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 11:50 AM by leftchick
I'm not sure if that is a ear piece or just funky ears...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
56. here


and

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
37. what if...
What if Bush really was wired? And what if Kerry's operatives knew - and helped jam the signal?

What if both campaigns are now fully aware there is an all-out political war going on in this country. What if the stakes were higher even than us DUers realize at the moment?

I find these things to be possible - even probable considering the immense resources and the decades of preparation that have gone into solidifying BFEE power in the white house...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
170. Agreed. The stakes are enormous
I posted elsewhere that I believe *'s signal in the first debate was periodically, perhaps even inadvertently, jammed. I also believe that no one in the Kerry campaign would benefit from pointing to a possible receiver until AFTER the third debate is over. The Senator is cleaning the floor with *, even if he had help! Personally, I'd wait for the third debate, jam his signal, win the debate handily anyway, and then let the chips fall where they may about *'s cheating. I've won all the debates while he had help. Checkmate. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
40. This "bulge" is damn sure not his little peashooter!

New Information Shows Bush Indecisive, Paranoid, Delusional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakercub Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Let it go
If that is how he performs wired...STAY WIRED, George!!! It worked, really it did...you should do it again.

He was incompetent beyond belief (which I thoroughly enjoyed).
It would be interesting to see just how bad he is unwired though. The man is clearly the least intelligent president our history has ever known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. No, the reference is to his "manly endowments" according to
the West Texas party girls who derisively called him "peashooter"
because of his small size.

New Information Shows Bush Indecisive, Paranoid, Delusional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. BTW, his physical endowments match his mental endowments and
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 11:37 AM by VegasWolf
he is uniquely suited to be a cheerleader.

New Information Shows Bush Indecisive, Paranoid, Delusional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
160. you mean
"The West Texas Party Girls for Truth"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PotatoBoy Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
41. You guys are overanalyzing this. This almost requires tin foil
As much as I'd like to believe Georgey boy was cheating by having a wire to Rove, I don't think that's the case. I've seen other campaigns where he's addressing the audience, and he says "let me finish" out of nowhere, even though no one is interrupting him. I think he's just losing his mind, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
will work 4 food Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. In the Bible
there is a passage in revelations. Something to the effect of the antichrist having a "puppet" that would speak for him. I'm not up on revelations as I should be, but I know that this is indeed there. Perhaps one of you is better educated in this area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #45
62. So who's that make the puppet master? Cheney? Rev. Moon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. That might just mean he is usually wired
I agree with the part about him losing his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #41
60. It's obviously a methadone pump . . .
they don't require aluminum foil. Losing his mind? That's present tense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. I was thinking morphine pump!


New Information Shows Bush Indecisive, Paranoid, Delusional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
129. Probably talking to one of the voices in his head.
I could be convinced he's psychotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
134.  LOL! Occam's Razor.
"I think he's just losing his mind, that's all." :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xfundy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
44. It was JESUS talking to him!
Jesus told him to invade Iraq, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiouxJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
49. Well if he wears one tonight, Kerry ought to go yank it out
on camera. Just stroll over and yank it out, or wait until the end and do it during the handshake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #49
93. That would be sweet.
Can you imagine how loud the audience's gasps would be? Ninety minutes of listening to Bush stumble and mispronounce and then Kerry yanks the receiver out of his ear! Bush would try to strangle him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
53. Now consider what this does to your self-esteem.
BeetleBrain knows he has no choice. His caretakers have no confidence in his speaking abilities or his reasoning faculties. They gave him an F- a long time ago.

Just think about what this would do to your self-image. As he's standing there, sweating about having to show up for YET ANOTHER debate which he doesn't want to do. He stands there with his arms outstretched so they can clip on his listening device and the transmitter that sits on his back.

They test it out beforehand, to make sure it works properly. George has to go to another room, and the little voice in his ear tells him WHAT TO SAY.

They tutor him on how to tune out everything else (this was really easy for him) and just focus on the little voice in his head.

I would feel like a pile of warm dog-crap, pure and simple. Just imagine, to be at the mercy of technology and other people. What if they screw up? Or he accidentally pulls the wire out of his ear?

NOBODY can be successful under conditions like this. They can never rely on their wit or come up with sparkling answers. The best they can hope for is to tread water and not drown. A winnder does not need to act like this.

IT'S THE WAY OF LOSERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
54. I have said this for YEARS..
The cadence of his speech is totally different from when he's just riffing on his own..

Karen or Karl is feeding him lines.. He screwed up so badly, because there was a 2 minute limit, and either they didn't tal;k fast enough...or he cannot remember anything that long :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
57. It's his Borg implant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
59. Cellphones & microphones were JAMMED before/during the debates
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2443232


SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Sat Oct-02-04 05:17 PM
Original message
Cellphone and remote microphones were "jammed" before/during debate?

Edited on Sat Oct-02-04 05:18 PM by SoCalDem
I looked here, and did not see this.. On my way home today, I heard on 90.7 FM (here in LA area) someone who was discussing the debates. I got in after it started, so I don't know who the guy was,but anyway...

He was saying that in the few days before the debates, they were all yakking it up on their cell phones, and paging each other and using personal microphones to stay in contact..BUT... about an hour before the debate, NO ONE COULD GET ANY signal for ANY device..

They asked, and got for an answer..

I wonder if the * earpiece required that all other signals be blocked...

When I got home, I tried to listen to the rest of the segment, but I cannot find the manual for my new stereo, and could not figure out how to change the stations

I would really hate to think that he was being coached, considering the dismal performance he gave, but.....

It would explain ONE thing.. The "answers" were no more than 2 minutes long, and by the time someone (Karen??) fed him the answers, his time would have been pretty much..up..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Earpiece wouldn't require the other signals be blocked,
but how would it look if one of these other devices picked up the signal? If someone chatting with his girlfriend suddenly picked up Rove saying "These are dangerous times, which require hard work"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. That's PRECISELY why I think the others were jammed
Early in his term, there was SOME kind of message intercepted..That's what started this whole thing about the earpiece..It was just a few words, but people started buzzing about it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Can Rove Drink Water While Bush Speaks?
I think they should make Karl Rove drink a glass of water whenever Bush is speaking.


"Remember, Cheney is the real President. Bush is just the touring company."
- Randy Rhodes, Air America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #65
75. Cameras did pick up the signal there's a link above. You can hear a...
different voice saying everything before Bush does. They actually broadcast it i believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. I think it would be very hard to do this.
Kerry is yakking in one ear, Rove or somebody is trying to give a response in realtime in the other ear, Shrubbie can't help but try and pay attention to the lights, the moderator, his thirst, his having to pee, and then repeat the response. It really shows some serious desperation if they resorted to this. Surely they would have practiced, and knew it was troublesome, but would have decided to go forward anyway. Wow.

And I didn't give much credence to this at first, but in that picture, you can see what looks like a wire going up to his collar. Why that would even be (surely they would be wireless?), I don't know, but what else could it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. Maybe that's why they practiced so hard..
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 12:13 PM by SoCalDem
and yes it would be "hard work" to do it..that's why he failed so badly..

The 2 minute limit was probably something he thought he could "get around", and when he founhd out he could not, it really freaked him out,:)..Maybe he was getting "transmissions" while he was grimacing and smirking during the times kerry was talking....and then he forgot what he was supposed to say when it was his turn:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #72
85. Maybe (Oh, I wish) that *would puke just like his Daddy did
in the Japanense Prime Minister's lap. I think it's time. We are all over due for a Presidental Internationally Televised Puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #85
101. What if he puked on the floor and ....
... something in the puke crawled away? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
82. It also explains why his answers were so limited and repetitive
... he wasn't answering the questions before him in detail or specifics, he was mouthing talking points that they kept feeding him.

But personally I don't think he's coordinated enough to multi-task at that level without a MAJOR faux pas.

:evilgrin:

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
69. Gotta love that headline ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
74. Hey, this is really scary stuff when you think about it.
It sure looks and sounds as if someone's feeding him info, but think
of all the implications - a "President" so dumb and hopeless he
can't be trusted to speak by himself, coached and manipulated by
shadowy people who have their own agenda, pulling a gigantic swindle
on the American public, and on the world for that matter.

This is really getting close to some sort of robot-president
scenario - if it's true, surely it's the height of cynicism - and
what does it say about the motives and the real agenda of the
people who are manipulating this ridiculous glove-puppet?

And isn't it frightening to think that the kind of people who would
plan this and carry it out are really running the show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #74
112. We had eight years of the same thing...
... with Reagan. Just a little lower tech... 3x5 cards, instead of wires.... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
77. That could explain it...first thought I think: "he's pregnant"
:P n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
86. AWOL's positioning on stage when before and after the "debate" was
suspiscious if you ask me. AWOL walked across the stage VERY quickly to greet Kerry and would NOT let Kerry behind him. Afterward AWOL tried to avoid having his back to Kerry when they were in close quarters.

Anyone have a screen shot of AWOL after the debate with his family with his back to the camera?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. Maybe this is why his tie was crooked
Remember the freeper who thought Kerry delibertly pulled Bush's tie out of place with his handshake? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
89. I predicted this a LONG TIME AGO! Why the hell aren't the DEMS
FUCKING JAMMING THE SIGNAL?!!!

Jesus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. Maybe they did.
That would explain the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
103. I hope so lakemonster11! that helped, thanks!
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #89
107. Kerry's pen...
James Bond style signal jammer? He seemed to use it with such glee! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Nice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #107
126. God I hope so!!!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
91. it was his wallet, stuffed with kickbacks from Halliburton
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 01:43 PM by Lisa
Being somewhat paranoid, he wanted to keep it somewhere on his person at all times in case someone pilfered it (hey, with guys like Dick Cheney around, who wouldn't be concerned). And even George W. realized that if he walked onstage with a huge lopsided bulge in his pocket, someone would notice. He was watching the Bruce Willis "Die Hard" movie just the night before, and voila, a brainwave! He duct-taped the billfold between his shoulderblades, under his jacket. (Because that's where Bruce's character hid his gun.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
96. oh good grief. It was probably this:
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 02:01 PM by Nordic
I work in media production and here's what it probably was:

It was a presidential debate, right?

So the sound guys think "hm, what happens if something goes wrong with the podium microphones? What do we do for backup?"

So both Kerry and Bush were probably rigged with wireless mics in their suits, so that if the podium microphones went out, they could switch over to the wireless.

That's probably all it was.

Years ago, Paula Abdul was performing in the music video awards. They rigged her with a microphone, with the transmitter in the small of her back right above her ass. It made her look "fat" and that's all anybody could talk about. It was right before she went on tour, and she freaked out about it. A good friend of mine was working on the tour, and it was a big deal for them. I think she actually went anorexic for a while in part because of this.

In a media event such as this it would be very difficult for the him to rig himself up with such a device and it wouldn't be hidden from anybody.

If he did have some kind of surreptitious device, it would have been completely hidden in his ear.

And if he did have a device, he would have done a whole lot better than he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #96
102. Seems plausible. Do we have pictures of Kerry's back at the debate?
Shouldn't be too hard to confirm or refute this theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #96
104. The actual earpiece is some sort of fancy wireless deal and he did have 2
mics on the front of his suit which some suggest is the reason the "receiver" (or whatever it may have been) was on his back. It may turn out to be bs but we know he has used this kind of thing before (he even got caught using one in a press conference) plus the repugs were adament about there being a rule against cameras showing the candidates backs. There may be another explanation but damn if it's not a little fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #96
119. According to the debate MOU, both candidates had wireless mikes
So that is a plausible explanation.
See p.24 of the memorandum of understanding:
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/election2004/debates2004mou.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #96
122. That makes sense.
Seriously, if people are thinking that Bush is reacting like William Hurt's airheaded journalists' character (Broadcast News) while Holly Hunter was cramming factual tidbits in his ear ... remember this is Bush we're talking about. I'm not saying that it's totally out of the realm of possibility, I just don't see how it's practical. And I don't think Bush has the natural intelligence to pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #96
131. Right, nobody could cheat *and* suck that bad!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #96
135. The Salon story says "no electronic devices on the president or Kerry"
For what it's worth:

An official for the Commission on Presidential Debates, which set up the lecterns and microphones on the Miami stage, said the condition was indeed real, the result of negotiations by both campaigns. Yet that didn't stop Fox from setting up cameras behind Bush and Kerry. The official said that "microphones were mounted on lecterns, and the commission put no electronic devices on the president or Senator Kerry." When asked about the bulge on Bush's back, the official said, "I don't know what that was."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #135
148. The actual document (see my post above) says that they *do* have wireless
mike attached in case of main mike failure. Believe me, I would love to catch the Chimp on something like this, but the accusation is not based on good evidence. The bulge could have been a wireless mike transmitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #96
155. so why didn't the White House just say that when asked?
They said he wasn't wearing a receiver and that he wasn't wearing a bulletproof jacket. So why didn't they say it was a backup mic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
105. Bush camp comments on mystery bulge (Salon.com latest)
Source: Salon.com

I love this. Am tempted to say, 'I cannot confirm or deny,' and let the story get some legs," McKinnon responded by email to O'Connor's inquiry. (As a top media operative for Bush, McKinnon should probably know that the story has already run a marathon through the blogosphere.) "Or, how about, 'Since we put the metal plate in his head, we have had some measure of success with audio transmissions to the President.' Or, 'Yeah, but it clearly broke down during the debate.' Unfortunately, the truth is not nearly as interesting. The answer is, 'The President has never been assisted by any audio signal.'"

While McKinnon was not without a sense of humor in denying the existence of any audio aid, it's intriguing that he said nothing about what that odd little bulge actually might have been.

With an official denial now on record, O'Connor wonders if anyone who can prove otherwise will step forward: "Any media professionals -- like the 'top Washington editor for Reuters' who reportedly told 'isbushwired' last spring that 'Sure, Bush uses an earpiece sometimes. State of the Union -- he had an earpiece for that. Everybody knows it.' -- please identify yourselves."

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. Key weasel phrase here is "assisted by"
A non-denial denial. They would probably claim he wasn't being assisted, just staying in touch in case there is a terrorist attack, or something equally preposterous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #106
114. Maybe they slip the earpiece in his ear at night and then just tell him...
it's his conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
109. This has been going on for years
Listen to the pauses between his sentences; thet're always as long as the sentence that follows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
111. I'd swear there was another photo of the bulge
Right after the debate I remember seeing a photo of * slouching off stage and noticed the square bulge on his back. I remember thinking how beaten up and defeated he looked and wondered what that weird bulge could be.

But I can't find the photo now. Can anyone else find it? Surely it wasn't a figment of my imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #111
139. Go to c-span and view the video
according to the UK Guardian its visable around the 23 minute mark

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/salon/0,14779,1323334,00.html
The rumour is flying around the globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
113. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
118. Easy: it's where the wind-up key goes. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
121. Is the bulge like the lava dome on Mt. St. Helens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ciaobox Donating Member (796 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
123. Guardian UK, Reuters Picks up Earpiecegate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #123
127. Oh Wow I bet he did
"So what was it? Jacob McKenna, a spyware expert and the owner of the Spy Store, a high-tech surveillance shop in Spokane, Washington, looked at the Bush image on his computer monitor. "There's certainly something on his back, and it appears to be electronic," he said. McKenna said that, given its shape, the bulge could be the inductor portion of a two-way push-to-talk system. McKenna noted that such a system makes use of a tiny microchip-based earplug radio that is pushed way down into the ear canal, where it is virtually invisible. He also said a weak signal could be scrambled and be undetected by another broadcaster."

I like this paragraph from the guardian

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
128. I saw the bulge three different times during the first debate --
and kept commenting on it to the others at my debate party. I swear the cameraman was deliberately trying to reveal it to us.

Has anyone actually showed the WH a picture and have them tell us what it was -- if it's not an ear piece????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
132. I'm beginning to think it may be just a shadow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #132
143. It sticks out too much
Some GOP moron on MSNBC just said it was his "backbone." No wonder he doesn't want a physical...he's got adult onset scoliosis in a big way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
138. What about some kind of chimp anatomy thing?
Has anyone considered that this may be something quite natural to the species? I plan to review "Planet of the Apes" for clues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
144. Bush's tailor shoots down the rumor (Knight-Ridder)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #144
147. They showed us Sattelite pics of WMD and you believe his
tailor.......Just look on the picture its right there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #144
156. his tailor is FRENCH. his chef is FRENCH. he's surrounded by FRENCH.
French-lover. 8^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zzapatista Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
150. Any bulge tonight? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dqueue Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. no pics, but...
We noticed odd creases at some points early on tonight. Moreso, it appeared to be body armor... something with suspender-like straps. I don't have an easy tivo-to-mpeg path, unfortunately. I can try to get some rough timings tomorrow. I tivo'd MSNBC, fwiw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
152. It's the left sock...
...the right one he used to stuff his flightsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackieforthedems Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
154. It's Probably
his bullet proof vest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
157. But all the guesses as to other causes of the bulge don't explain
the second voice.

It was clearly two different voices, not an echo. How does the
WH explain that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkhbrit Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #157
158. BBC have this story too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
159. Bullet proof vest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #159
166. WH says he wasn't wearing one
see "Salon: the bulge gets bigger" in LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #166
175. So?
The White House denies alot of things, still it seems more reasonable that it is a bullet proof vest.

Why the fuck would they stick a boxy transmitter on his back?

Its a vest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiswrong Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #159
167. The pucker thing can't be true
The tailor apparently said that the pucker was accentuated by Bush crossing his arms and moving forward. If you look at the BBC picture, the act of crossing his arms and moving forward would have had the effect of smoothing out anything in Bush's back - making the fabric more taught -- not bunching it up. That's why we see the object more clearly in those poses than in the others.

I challenge the Bush administration to take one of this tailor's vanilla suits (that was made before the debates) and put it on someone, have them cross their arms and move forward, and make any similar appearances on the person's back.

The fact that they are trying to "fabricate" (pun intended) this makes innocent explanations (wireless mic, body armor, etc.) much less likely.

- w is wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #159
169. The White House has denied that it was a bulletproof vest.
But they still won't explain what it was.

It was so obviously there, and had to be created by something. That they're "laughing it off" just allows for rumors to spread. Which is fine with me, don't get me wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #169
176. just because...
they deny something doesnt mean its not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
174. Monkey boy
do you see how he stands in that picture he looks like a neanderthal, they should have wispered to him in his ear to "cmon on cmon boy play human play human, now speak"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC