Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debate Divide: Debate Viewers Split on Winner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:05 AM
Original message
Debate Divide: Debate Viewers Split on Winner
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/second_debate_instapoll_041008.html

Oct. 9, 2004— The presidential contenders battled to a draw, with viewers of the second presidential debate in St. Louis divided, largely along partisan lines, on who won.


Among registered voters who watched Friday night's debate, 44 percent called John Kerry the winner, 41 percent said President Bush won and 13 percent called it a tie. That three-point difference between Kerry and Bush is within the poll's margin of sampling error.

About equal numbers of partisans tuned in — 35 percent of viewers were Democrats, 32 percent Republicans and 29 percent independents. And few minds were changed: Viewers divided by 50 percent to 47 percent between Kerry and Bush before the debate, and by an almost identical 50 percent to 48 percent after it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is it me or can yuio see the bias here
By the way if bush won it woudl be sold as a glorious victory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruffhowse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You got that right. If the poll results were reversed, they would be
crowing about how amazing a comeback Bush made, and there would be no mention of it being within the margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Party uber alles.
Now we know exactly how they let it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. not really. the nazis were a *new* party
the old partisans, on both sides, were the enemy. hitler was the quintessential "third way" candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. where i come from 44 is more than 41
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpa Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bush Is Terrible
That is on of the few polls where this is even close. The others had Kerry winning overwhelmingly. Louisville considers a three point loss a tie. That is why our country is not better off-because of citizens who think like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Fuzzy math. I liked the way Kerry used that phrase last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. They are whores in other ways


BUT, IT IS a statistical tie. Your household measuring tape doesn't give a 0.01 inch precision. Similar idea here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. hey, i just noticed something. the repukes aren't tuning in. they are
scared. they don't want to watch bush lose... they don't want to lose their nerve.

think about it. if they don't tune in, they wont vote either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Good point. I think you're on to something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I wish intelligent republicans
...(now, in New England, that is NOT an oxymoron, really--think Jim Jeffords and Linc Chaffee) would selectively tune in, though. All you had to do was see that hyperactive, hyper-aggressive performance, the shouting, the hectoring, the lame and inappropriate jokes, the Gibson lunge, the outright lies and sly misstatements, the forceful whining (a switch from the whimpering whining of the first debate) and you come to one conclusion--this guy is NOT QUALIFIED.

Weewee fed red meat to his dumbass base--someone told me, listening to CSPAN call ins, that all of the pro-weewee crowd sounded like uneducated buffoons, while all of the pro-JK callers sounded like they had benefited from a proper education.

It's true, I am seeing it whenever I encounter one of his supporters--if you are stupid, you like weewee the hard workin' and wimmen-lovin' cowboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. John Stuart Mill
paraphrased, because it's late and I'm too lazy to go look up the exact quote, but he said something a lot like:

Not all conservatives I know are stupid, but all the stupid people I know are conservative.

When I read this, I had a small, Zenlike enlightenment -- it absolutely covered my observations all my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. stupid or close-minded?
Edited on Sun Oct-10-04 02:15 AM by Carolab
I have been wrestling with this of late. I have met * supporters that I wouldn't exactly call stupid, but more accurately block-headed--unwilling to accept new evidence and change their positions in light of it--much like * himself. Also, it seems that they are always looking to see a "gotcha" in anything--however wrong-headed it may be--like the "want sum wood" remark. They will throw back things at you that are basically unexamined, such as someone just accepting Rathergate as "made up" and using that to blanket-condemn CBS and all so-called "liberal" media...know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hopefully Kerry will have a "tie" like this during the election
If Kerry wins on election day by the same margin, will ABC also call it a tie?

More right wing bias in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Didn't they sort of come to that conclusion last time?
And BTW. wasn't Bush's win within the margin of error? LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. CNN's comment this morning was really annoying
They said that a Gallup poll after the debate gave Kerry an "insignificant" edge over Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC