Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush special envoy embroiled in controversy over Iraq debt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:41 PM
Original message
Bush special envoy embroiled in controversy over Iraq debt
Mr Baker's Carlyle Group is in a consortium secretly proposing to try to collect $27bn (£15bn) on behalf of Kuwait, one of Iraq's biggest creditors, by using high-level political influence. It claims Mr Baker will not benefit personally, but the consortium could make millions in fees, retainers and commission as a result.

Other countries, including Britain, have been urged by Mr Baker to relieve the new Iraq regime of its $200bn debt burden. Iraq owes Britain approximately $1bn. One international lawyer described the consortium's scheme as "influence peddling of the crassest kind".


Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University and a leading expert on government ethics and regulations, said this meant that Mr Baker was in a "classic conflict of interest".

"Baker is on two sides of this transaction: he is supposed to be representing the interests of the US, but he is also a senior counsellor at Carlyle, and Carlyle wants to get paid to help Kuwait recover its debts from Iraq." She added: "Carlyle and the other companies are exploiting Baker's current position to try to land a deal with Kuwait that would undermine the interests of the US government."

more
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1326037,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am getting sicker by the minute
this country is in the septic tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only solution to this is to put baker in jail someplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good idea. How about Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Does 'James Baker III" mean ...
... he gets to be on the third level of the pyramid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Full version of The Nation story here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. James Baker, the consigliere of the BFEE
If he's around, you know it stinks. As soon as I found out that that unctuous fuck had been sent to Florida in 2000, I knew the game would be rigged.

Unlike Tom Hagen, Baker excels in wartime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Baker Is Representing The Saudi Royals Against The 9/11 Widows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Look up "conflict of interest" in Black's Law Dictionary
And you'll see James Baker's overfed smug phiz looking out at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsquared Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. The total arrogance demonstrated by this conflict of interest is a sign
that they really are deluded by their (temporary) power. I am betting that the secrets that will come out on the Carlyle group and their multifaceted corruption after Bush's fall will still shock us. They are just setting themselves up further for a higher fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. ohhhhhhhhhh
There is no end to their anti-Americanism. Unspeakable monsters.

UNSPEAKABLE!

Can't someone on our side talk about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerOstrich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here is what they said at the time they appointed Baker..
When then asked if Baker's business interests posed a conflict of interest in his task of renegotiating Iraq's debt, Bush described Baker as a "man of high integrity" and of "enormous experience." Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said Baker "is fully complying with all laws and rules on the books, and has taken significant steps to avoid even the potential for a conflict of interest."

http://isuisse.ifrance.com/stopcarlyle/pressreviewbaker.htm

Not only does Baker & Botts represent Saudi royalty they represent Haliburton.

No potential for conflict....I think I had some words about it back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. can't a local bar association stand up to him?
why's everyone so afraid of this slimy asshole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC