Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suburbs' Grass Isn't Always Greener

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 11:16 AM
Original message
Suburbs' Grass Isn't Always Greener
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=usatoday/suburbsgrassisntalwaysgreener

For the first time, the number of poor people in the suburbs almost equals the number in cities at the center of metropolitan areas.


The stronghold of middle-class America for more than 50 years, suburbs now are home to an increasing number of the very poor and the very rich, according to a report to be released today by the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington, D.C.


The share of suburbanites living in middle-income neighborhoods dropped from 75% in 1980 to 61% in 2000, according to the Brookings report. During the same period, the percentage of people living in poor and affluent suburbs increased.


"The image of suburbia as middle class and with good schools hasn't caught up with the reality," says Peter Dreier, a professor of politics at Occidental College in Los Angeles and co-author of the report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be Careful What You Wish For
A number of people here have suggested that suburbanites should all
move back into the cities. When they do, the city-dwellers that they
displace have to go somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe it's the same people?
I don't suppose the study allowed for the 45-55 year old bracket ...
the ones who would have paid off their mortgage but still lost their
job in the great out-sourcing race?

They wouldn't necessarily lose their house but would not have the
"suburbanite middle-income" jobs. This means that they've just
slipped from one statistician's pigeonhole into another whilst
staying the same people in the same house.

Just a thought ...

Nihil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC