(What's new for Fall? Fascism!)
http://home.frontiernet.net/newsdetail.asp?cat=3&id=58836965Associated Press/AP Online
WASHINGTON - Americans who disagree with the handling of the war in Iraq should keep their opinions to themselves - that's the thinly veiled suggestion from Bush administration supporters who consider open criticism of Iraq policy an aid to the enemy.
"It's very demoralizing" for U.S. troops, says retired Maj. Gen. John Singlaub, who was an Army Special Forces unit commander in the Vietnam War.
"You're either on one side, or you're on the other," said Illinois Republican Rep. Henry Hyde.
Some former commanders, analysts and lawmakers agree that division at home can embolden the enemy and over an extended period might hurt troop morale.
Others contend that it does neither - and say that even it if did, that's the price of democracy.
"A lot of us are sick and tired of those ... who would question our patriotism when we exercise our rights and responsibilities as Americans and members of Congress," Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., said at a recent hearing by the House International Relations Committee chaired by Hyde.
"I'm from Wisconsin, and I know McCarthyism when I see it," Democratic Rep. David Obey said at another hearing, referring to the red-baiting hearings of the early 1950s that eventually disgraced the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy, R-Wis. "So let's can the character attacks. ... Let's try to figure out how you can get out of this hash by leveling with each other."
President Bush suggested at the first debate that Democratic rival John Kerry would lose the Iraq campaign if elected because Kerry has said that it was the wrong war at the wrong time and a diversion from the real fight, which should target international terrorism
***clipped***