Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House demands total secrecy for US spy budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 05:34 AM
Original message
White House demands total secrecy for US spy budget
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1504&e=4&u=/afp/20041020/pl_afp/us_spy_secrecy_041020071330


<snip>


"Disclosing to the nation's enemy, especially during wartime, the amounts requested by the president, and provided by the Congress, for the conduct of the nation's intelligence activities would harm the national security," national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) and White House budget director Joshua Bolten wrote in a letter Tuesday to chief House-Senate negotiators.


Analysts said the White House demand had dampened the hopes of those who have waged a persistent fight for greater transparency in the US intelligence community.


The White House request came after the Senate and House of Representatives came up earlier this month with vastly different versions of a bill aimed at reorganizing the Central Intelligence Agency (news - web sites) and other parts of the intelligence community in order to make them more efficient.


The Senate bill calls, among other things, for doing away with a decades-old practice of keeping secret the amount of money the US government spends annually on spy operations abroad. It stops short, however, of disclosing specifics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bad news
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gavodotcom Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't this against the 9/11 Commission's findings?
I thought that intelligence spending was supposed to be subject to oversight--within reason, of course--to ensure to the public that the spooks were spending the money on the right priorities.

I could be completely wrong on my source, I've spent so much time reading, I'm sure there could be a mix-up.

If I'm right, though, wouldn't it be a fairly stupid position to take by the administration leading into the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Has the administration taken
any positions that were NOT stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gavodotcom Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. lol, yeah, but this is taking it to the extreme.
That's an incredibly tough sell with two weeks left to go. They'll get creamed on this if the association's repeatedly made. They must have a lot of faith in the media. People *heart* the 9/11 Commission, even though I know the administration's position against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogradda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. well lets see $$ knowledge is dangerous
releasing the name of an actual SPY is ok tho:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC