Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reservist says: 'We are not cowards'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:48 AM
Original message
Reservist says: 'We are not cowards'
People across the country have been telling stories about Spc. Major Coates and his fellow soldiers all week.

On Wednesday, the Mount Holly reservist decided to speak for himself.

The voices of the Army reservists who disobeyed a direct order last week in Iraq have been noticeably absent from news accounts of the incident. Instead, relatives such as Coates' father, Johnny, and military officials, have spoken for the soldiers.

But Coates telephoned the Observer from Iraq Wednesday, saying he wanted to clear up some misinformation.

In addition to correcting details in an account his father gave the newspaper Tuesday, Coates said he wanted to emphasize a key point: That neither he, nor his fellow soldiers, were too afraid to go on the mission they refused.

"We are not cowards," he said. "The way that things come out, it makes us look like that. ... Our soldiers have run missions all over Iraq; we're never scared to go on a mission."......

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/9973491.htm?1c

Coates refutes things his father said but doesn't offer any alternative information. It sounds like he's trying to dispel the image of the unit banding together or conspiring. An expert suggests that this would be a more serious situation and that the Army hasn't been using the word 'mutiny' in this case yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. right, Bush is the coward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yeah, What's The Difference Between Iraq And Vietnam?
A: Bush had a plan for getting out of Vietnam.

*baaa-zing*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. They got things done, though.
There was a two-week stand-down for maintenance and other materiel readiness issues, and the commander was just relieved of duty (at her request - shaaa, as if).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chuckrocks Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. has max cleland
or any other injured vet weighed in on this yet? or anyone that lost a family member to war? i hope someone with some media attention is helping these brave people. this is not the time to let this slip i think. *co can run with this if its ann the man vs soldier's father in puditland. these people don't know real bravery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. being stupid does not equal brave
being smart does. These reservists did the right and brave thing by refusing to go on a death mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. its confusing to me
but this article seems to indicate that the mission was completed without incident.

they were given better vehicles and the mission was done, but 17 still held out. so you, or they, cant say they refused to go on a "death mission"

the whole thing is getting murkier, it seems to me the military is trying to scrub this

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. nobody thinks them cowardly!
Nobody who counts, anyway. Some of those chickenhawk armchair warrior types might, but those people are beneath notice.


Mary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vs the introvore Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. not really heroic, though.
and i am not saying that the platoon did not act honorably. i believe that they can justify their decision within the UCMJ. (see another one of my posts for details)
but we are not hearing from them because their actions are so borderline. they're in court martial purgatory. still impresive i say but if the mutual platoon ass really was immediately on the line, right then and there, line to ass, wouldn't they not shy away then from careening on outta there at full speed and damn the explosions even.
frickin road warrior was able to deliver the gas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Caution is preferable to rash bravery." Shakespeare
"Discretion is the better part of valor." Grampa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm Pissed
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 06:18 PM by stepnw1f
On edit. Why do these folks feel they have to defend themselves against this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Because armchair warriors and keyboard commandos
...are weighing in with a whole stanking load of woulda, coulda and shoulda. They might try getting their fat asses down to the recruiting office if they feel so strongly...but that's just my opinion!

By EVERY account, this unit was a cut above the average bunch of pre-war on terra reservists. They had high morale, esprit de corps, they felt their mission was important, and they took their jobs seriously. They also watched each other's back. What leader would not want a crew like that? What leader would not LISTEN to INPUT from a crew like that?

I am not one of those who blames a subordinate for a problem. When there is a breakdown in discipline to this scale, that tells me there was something SERIOUSLY WRONG...but it happened UP, not down, the chain of command.

I think those kids were quite brave. They had to know the situation was untenable no matter what they did. They had a choice--shut up and die for nothing, or pick up that whistle and blow, blow, BLOW.

If they were mine, I'd be proud of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC