Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Captain gets reprieve: Army captain from Manhattan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:23 AM
Original message
Captain gets reprieve: Army captain from Manhattan
The Army captain from Manhattan who is defying deployment to Iraq has won the first round of his fight not to fight.Capt. Jay Ferriola, who was supposed to report for 18 months of military police duty at 7 a.m. today, was granted an 11th hour reprieve yesterday while the Army reviews his retirement request.

Ferriola, 31, took the Army and U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to federal court on Friday, claiming the mobilization orders amounted to "illegal servitude" because he'd submitted retirement papers on June 7.The Army agreed to temporarily suspend his orders pending a review, for the moment averting a legal battle with possible implications for reservists caught in the so-called backdoor draft.

"We're very pleased. ... I'm extremely optimistic that the Army will rule in our favor," said Ferriola's attorney Barry Slotnick, standing outside federal court in Manhattan yesterday with his stone-faced client, whom he referred to as the "former captain."

Ferriola, wearing a gray suit and red tie and accompanied by his girlfriend and several Army buddies, declined to answer reporters' questions, saying his lawyer would comment for him.Although Ferriola's resignation was approved by his direct superior, Slotnick said the captain has "nothing in writing acknowledging his resignation" and "nothing in writing rejecting his resignation" from higher-ranked officials.

http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/nyc-nycapt254018811oct25,0,1161340.story?coll=nyc-homepage-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RivetJoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Retirement papers?"
WTF? Did he enter the Army at 11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The story of Ferriola
Ferriola had voluntarily enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve in 1993 for an eight-year period in exchange for an ROTC scholarship at the Virginia Military Institute.

After graduating, he served in various Army positions and was promoted to the rank of captain. In February 2000 he was separated from active duty and placed in the reserves.

Last year he was ordered back to active duty and was released to the reserves in June, 2003. He completed the eight years of service with the Army in February of this year.

He submitted his written resignation as a reserve officer on June 7, and his commanding officer then recommended the resignation be approved. The suit said, however, that Ferriola never received an official response to his resignation request.

The suit charges that Ferriola's rights were violated because the military wrongfully failed to process his resignation in a timely manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RivetJoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So, it's separation
paper, not retirement papers then.

Sounds like he might have a case, since the military failed to act on his request. Of course, EVERYONE in the military knows that nothing is official until you "see it in writing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. you mean like Bush how many years younger..???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. If he succeeds in this it will only be because
they want to keep it out of the media. We can't have the media actually showing how our military is not 100% behind the President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC