Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(NBC's)Embedded Reporter Saw No Explosives Search

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:47 PM
Original message
(NBC's)Embedded Reporter Saw No Explosives Search
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 02:02 PM by maddezmom
NEW YORK - An NBC News reporter embedded with a U.S. army unit that seized an Iraqi installation three weeks into the war said Tuesday that she saw no signs that the Americans searched for the powerful explosives that are now missing from the site.


Reporter Lai Ling Jew, who was embedded with the Army's 101st Airborne, Second Brigade, said her news team stayed at the Al-Qaqaa base for about 24 hours.


"There wasn't a search," she told MSNBC, an NBC cable news channel. "The mission that the brigade had was to get to Baghdad. That was more of a pit stop there for us. And, you know, the searching, I mean certainly some of the soldiers head off on their own, looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around.


"But as far as we could tell, there was no move to secure the weapons, nothing to keep looters away."

more: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041026/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_weapons_nbc&cid=540&ncid=1480

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, NBC knows nothing.
They have no idea what was at that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. How could we secure the weapons when we had to rush to Baghdad to secure
the oil ministry !!! Jeez our military got hosed and now they are paying for it ! Support our troops ! Dump W !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. HAHA, and the Freepers were so excited by the news......
Now it's all blowing up in their faces!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. You mean *gasp* Drudge was lying?
Say it isn't so.

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Alas, sludge fires another dud
The whole story was suspect, since that brigade was just invasion fodder grunts, no weapons experts who would have known what they were looking at anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is another worm turned. Now, will CNN explain itself???
They've been whoring the *conclusion* that there were no explosives there when the invasion happened ALL DAY.

Time to set the record straight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Of course not
the story's already buried.

Ashley Simpson has acid reflux...*haven't you heard*?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And Scott Peterson's defense rested!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Delete
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 04:00 PM by Oaf Of Office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why did NBC say there was no evidence of explosives?
Edited on Tue Oct-26-04 03:39 PM by pa28
Is it possible they chucked out the spin and told a flat-out lie to protect Bush? Based on their track record I'd say it's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. No Explosives Title is misleading: Vast Amount, No Move to Secure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC