My guess is you have been drinking their feel good kool-aid.
To a more easily understandable part of it though try this.
The one top is just for Wisconsin and the one below is just for the CEO'S and not corporations
Special Interests Average 33,000% Gain
On Campaign Contributions Madison – A $10,000 investment a year ago in one of the most profitable stocks on the market – Genstar Therapeutics – would be worth $162,500 today, a 1,525% gain. That’s a lucrative return, but it’s not nearly the bang for the buck that special interests received from investing in state policymaking.
A Wisconsin Democracy Campaign report titled "Playing the Policy Market" shows that more than a dozen special interests with a stake in items considered during the 1999-2000 legislative session realized an economic benefit that amounted to an average 33,043% gain from the campaign contributions they invested during the session.
Individual gains by the special interests that benefited from the policies driven by their contributions ranged from 396% to 103,221% (Table 1). The biggest industry winners and the policy return on their contributions included payday lenders who fought a cap on interest rates, 103,221%; the road builders who sought more money for highway construction, 92,582%; the vending machine industry which got a sales tax break, 20,605%; and waste disposal, paper and business interests which fought higher garbage disposal fees, 19,751%.
Individual companies also got lucrative returns on their investments in the system (Table 2), particularly if they were generous, long-term contributors or from industries whose collective campaign contributions have made them influential. Some of these companies and their returns were Maximus, 99,900%, and C.D. Smith Construction Co., 69,722%.
(snip)
http://www.wisdc.org/prerelpolmkt.htmlContributors & PaybacksCorporate Cronies
The Bush administration, on behalf of some of its biggest financial backers, has worked to delay and debilitate a reform measure that would hold CEOs and corporate boards more accountable to their shareholders.
On October 14, 2003, after a series of corporate scandals, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) formally introduced the so-called shareholder access rule, a modest reform measure that would make it easier for concerned investors to place their own nominees on a company’s board of directors. More than a year later, the rule still hasn’t been approved by the SEC.
Fifty-three senior executives from corporations opposed to the rule qualified as “Rangers,” “Pioneers” or “Super Rangers” – the honorary titles given to big-money bundlers who have collected at least $200,000 or $100,000, respectively, for the Bush campaigns or $300,000 for the Republican National Committee (RNC). These rainmakers personally rounded up at least $8.3 million – probably much more – for Bush campaign efforts in 2000 and 2004.
(snip)
http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/contributorsandpaybacks/