Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Newswire Press Releases: Lockhart Statement...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:03 AM
Original message
U.S. Newswire Press Releases: Lockhart Statement...
Lockhart Statement on Reports that U.S. Troops Were Not Ordered to Search Al Qaqaa

6 minutes ago

To: National Desk, Political Reporter


Contact: Chad Clanton or Phil Singer, 202-464-2800, both of Kerry-Edwards 2004


WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Kerry-Edwards senior advisor Joe Lockhart released the following statement today:


"George Bush (news - web sites) has staked his re-election on his credentials as a war President; but that record is a failed litany of one catastrophic mistake after another.


"In an effort to cover up its latest display of incompetence, the White House desperately suggests that the missing explosives were removed by Saddam before the U.S. military passed through the Al Qaqaa site, arguing that the soldiers moving through the facility had not found any of the explosives. Like so many other White House excuses, this assertion has now been turned on its head.


"Now we know that the commander of these troops made very clear that his unit's sole mission was to rush to Baghdad despite specific warnings about this facility. The fact that White House officials, including the Vice President, continue to manipulate the truth about what happened with regard to these explosives is cause for grave concern.

more: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20041027/pl_usnw/lockhart_statement_on_reports_that_u_s__troops_were_not_ordered_to_search_al_qaqaa102_xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Proves that they knew in advance there weren't "WMD"
so why waste time looking, instead they make a bee line to the oil fields in Kirkuk. Now this little deception comes back and bites them in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly. That perspective isn't even being addressed in the media.
If we went there due to WMDs, shouldn't securing the weapons sites (chemical, nuke, other) have been been the highest priority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illuminaughty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. I always wondered
why no one mentioned how quickly all the gas masks came off the soldiers and embedded journalists.

If there was ever any real fear of WMDs being released, they'd have sported those all the way to Baghdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. "5" that story.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a 5 with one vote(mine)
Vote away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I gave it a 5
and it said it had just one vote--WTF????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ditto. I voted, and it says 1 vote total. Hmmm... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. still says one vote...is that normal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, it is quite normal.
For a broken vote system. </sarcasm>

Hope it isn't a harbinger of what's to come next Tuesday. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrewha Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. NASA agrees, bush lies
read this article, it makes me feel helpless, if bush wins again, this country needs to be turned upside down, we can't have anymore of this, we are becoming north korea, we cant even access vital information about our planet, bush hates us, and wants us ignorant. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6341451/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Hi bigbrewha!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. at the present time this one will not allow rating (always shows unrated)
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 01:34 AM by truthisfreedom
you can rate it 5 if you want, but right now it's not storing any results. i've seen a few other sensitive stories like this which won't accept rating. it could be in this case that it's a press release, not a news story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrewha Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. NASA agrees Bush is a Dictator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. The following paragraph from the article:
"Hansen said the administration wants to hear only scientific results that “fit predetermined, inflexible positions.” Evidence that would raise concerns about the dangers of climate change is often dismissed as not being of sufficient interest to the public.."


This is the same thing they did with the intel about WMDs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Fits in with Suskind's story
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 02:05 AM by Carolab
"Without a Doubt"--about this "administration" not being reality-based but rather "rewriting reality" for others to study what they, as "actors" have done. They are writing their OWN reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. This NASA story needs to be posted by itself
Unbelievable, yet why am I not surprised. If you can't start a thread yet, let me know and I'll post this one in LBN for you?

BTW: Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC