Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:02 PM
Original message
NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate
You need a subscription to Salon.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/index.html

"George W. Bush tried to laugh off the bulge. "I don't know what that is," he said on "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, referring to the infamous protrusion beneath his jacket during the presidential debates. "I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt."

Dr. Robert M. Nelson, however, was not laughing. He knew the president was not telling the truth. And Nelson is neither conspiracy theorist nor midnight blogger. He's a senior research scientist for NASA and for Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and an international authority on image analysis. Currently he's engrossed in analyzing digital photos of Saturn's moon Titan, determining its shape, whether it contains craters or canyons.

For the past week, while at home, using his own computers, and off the clock at Caltech and NASA, Nelson has been analyzing images of the president's back during the debates. A professional physicist and photo analyst for more than 30 years, he speaks earnestly and thoughtfully about his subject. "I am willing to stake my scientific reputation to the statement that Bush was wearing something under his jacket during the debate," he says. "This is not about a bad suit. And there's no way the bulge can be described as a wrinkled shirt."
"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Momof1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. ROTFLMAO its called Karma
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. what a bad day the chimp is having....LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. And it gets better and better :)
It couldn't happen to a nicer guy. HUH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. "You need a subscription to Salon....
Edited on Thu Oct-28-04 10:07 PM by flowomo
and you all should get one if you can afford it. They give all kinds of nice gifts, like free magazines, and it's a great site.

Oh, and this is a great story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The writing is great: Joe Conason, Sidney Blumenthal, Eric Boehlert
and great arts writing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. there is always DayPass for watching an ad
Edited on Thu Oct-28-04 10:18 PM by maddezmom
Vonage...I'll probably call tomorrow!!

Wanted to see the photo, since I was off line during the debate....it was well worth it.

I't like a "Can you hear me now" photo. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. A Jet Propulsion Pack, perhaps?
Maybe a small moon? That's what Nelson seems to be qualified to analyze. Can we PLEASE just let this go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. why? This hurts Kerry how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Because it's just one more dumbass issue...
If it WAS a wire, would his performance have been so poor? WHY would he wear a wire with an antenna the size of a TV antenna on a 1970 Cadillac limo when he has the most recent technology available to him?

It just makes no sense and it makes us look like a bunch of raving lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I'm a tailor. It was not a wrinkle in the suit. Have worked on Kevlar
it wasn't a vest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. So? That doesn't mean it was a wire.
It simply makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Bush has NEVER made sense
and neither do his apologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. No. doesn't mean not a wire. Does mean the party line is bull
If it was a receiver of some sort, possible reason he still did poorly is the likelihood that the Secret Service uses jamming devices where he is. There are ample reports of cell phones and pages not working when he comes to a venue.

I am also not dismissing possibility that it is one of those devices which delivers pulsing electric stimulation to treat chronic pain. Would explain why it shows up in some photos at the pig farm where he is in tee shirt.

But IT IS NOT a wrinkled suit nor is it a vest. The fact that they played the lie on the 'badly tailored suit' is pretty damning. And Rove would not be likely to tell the SS not to use jammers cuz they had the prez wired as he is not yet ready for prime time on his own.

The business with him postponing his annual physical has me leaning toward some sort of pain control device.

But I really love the explanation one DUer had: that they have to strap explosives on him to force him to preform... hey, aren't there some unaccounted for explo-shit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaryL Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. What it means is...
There was something under the shirt, not an eff'n wrinkle. I don't care if it was O2 being pumped directly into an empty skull cavity, this asshole has been lying to us for 4 years. I've been one of the biggest naysayers about this and seeing these pictures PISSES ME OFF!!!! Every time I give this lying shit the benefit of the doubt I get burned. When you going to catch on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
104. Extremely well put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
79. I'm with them on this one
There's something under there.

I'm just hoping it's not a medical device like a back brace - cuing up for the sympathy vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
94. Looks to me like
the shirt was too big so just grabbed some material horizontal and vertical, pinned it, and stiched it. I doubt a wire would show at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Ahhh, still trying to win the approval
of the rightwingnuts, eh?
And meeting with the same warm DU reception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
69. This, from the woman who claims Todd Beamer never existed...
I'm hurt.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. so this NASA dude is a raving lunatic?(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. I think that the folks that just want to give this bizarre appearance
a pass is like sticking a dead head in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. BECAUSE HE STUPID AND LAZY AND FIGURED SINCE HE GOT AWAY WITH IT BEFORE...
IN FACT, TWICE BEFORE, FOR HIS STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS, AND A Q + A IN FRANCE - WHERE THE WHISPER'S VOICE WAS PICKED UP AND RECORDED, AND COULD BE HEARD ON THE WHITE HOUSE WEB SITE FOR CHRISSAKE GIVING HIM THE ANSWERS!!!
DUH.
SO OF COURSE HE THOUGHT HE COULD DO IT AGAIN!
SO HE DIDN'T PREPARE, HAD A LOT OF LENGTHLY PAUSES AND SUDDENLY CAME UP WITH ANSWERS. WHILE I WAS WATCHING IT I WAS SURE HE WAS BEING FED THE ANSWERS SOMEHOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. Size
The bulky size is unavoidable when using scrambler technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
54. His performance would have been even poorer. You know that.
We've all seen enough of him to recognize how well he thinks on his feet.
"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
56. Poor performance..easily explained
The other times he has worn the device, HE was in control of the flow of conversation.. so if he misheard something "fed" to him, he could vamp and fill time with his nonsensical phrases (that MAY be their purpose..a time stall)...and if he has a tough time, he just waves and ends the photo-op


BUT

at the debates the MOST time he was allotted at any time was 2.5 minutes.. He has to hear the question, then repeat what is being said to him, all the while trying to look like he knows what he's saying.. and not appear to be stalling, while he's fed the next bit of information.. That's the ONLY way he was able to rattle off those names in quick succession.. he was repeating what he was told, word by word.

Try it sometime. It's very difficult to talk and be spoken to in your ear at the same time...and to try to think too..

The many days of preparation were probably to fine tune his "style and speed" of mouthing the transmissions.. Of course without knowing the exact questions, it took longer because he AND the "brain of the operation" had to bone up on all kinds of stuff and have answers that would fit the time frame..

THAT's why he did so poorly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
73. You Are So Off Base On This It's Not Even Funny
Raving lunatics? The only raving lunatics are the one's claiming there's no evidence there was something under his jacket. THERE'S DEFINITELY FUCKING EVIDENCE.

If this guy can decipher digital images from sattelites orbiting moons millions of miles away, he can analyze a clear lump on some morons back right here on earth and determine that it's real and there's something there other than bad shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. I'm just done replying to these threads...
Hey, believe what you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. One More Negative Story ONLY Hurts Bush
Why the fuck would that be a problem for you five days out?

I believe the evidence, you believe, uhh, err, umm Bush...That's YOUR problem, not mine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. I don't "believe" Bush. I just think it's a silly issue.
The fact is that we're never going to know what was under the jacket and, even if we did, it's not an issue that's going to make a difference anyway.

I just don't see any upside. The downside is that a lot of neutrals will see it as a wacko attack.

No, I don't believe Bush's explanation but I do feel this is an issue with no potential for gain.

Again, I'm done commenting on it. If there are people who want to make this an issue, fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #74
101. Good, cause you are soooooooo wrong it ain't funny.
Your comments are ridiculous. Totally and completely ridiculous and suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
82. I think one of Kerry's latest ads had your picture in it
The one with the ostrich in it. Don't you have any curiosity at all? We know something was there. It was very obvious, and their denials make it intriguing. I believe like you that it wasn't a radio receiver but what was it? What purpose did it serve and why do they deny it's existence? I believe it was some form of bullet proof vest and they don't want Bush* to be made out a coward even though he is but I am curious about it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
98. I don't think I look like a raving lunatic
and the fact that a NASA physicist is willing to stake his career on his conclusion that the president had SOMETHING under his coat appears to lend another piece of legitimacy to this discussion.

The point is that the president was asked a direct question - "what is this under your coat?" - and he LIED. He said there was nothing there.

The president said today that "it's all about trust," and here he is caught in another lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No. He cheated.
This deserves to get exposed.

But if he was wearing a wire, who the hell was giving him his lines? He did a shitty job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
103. Here's what I think
I think Kerry managed to disrupt the signal with that hearty handshake, where he stretched weewee's arm out and then gave him a manly slap on the back. I seem to recall that people here were laughing at the freepers for being so upset about the initial greeting.

I also noticed, in the subsequent debates, that weewee tried VERY hard to minimize the exposure of his back to the cameras. He damn near walked backwards to his place. Watch the tapes and you will see what I am talking about.

Who knows what was under his coat--I personally think it was a transmitter, I think he has used them ALOT and is used to them, and I think that the signal was either lousy or his timing was off. If it wasn't a transmitter, it was a medical device, and if that is the case, he is one sick guy either requiring a constant infusion of drugs, a shock to the heart at unexpected times, or a TENS unit to mitigate serious back pain.

If you really want to be a conspiracy theorist, wouldn't it be funny if you reread my first paragraph while entertaining the concept that KERRY KNEW EXACTLY what he was doing when he said his Howdys to weecowboy. BETTER STILL--Kerry's "magic pen" had a frequency disruptor device in it. After all, Kerry has done work for the See Eye Eh! in the past, maybe a friend in the agency gave him a magic pen to scramble weewee's signal!

My above paragraph is purely far out, idle speculation, but who really knows nowadays? Who would ever think that people could tell the military that weapons sites were left unguarded, and no provisions would be made for protecting those sites, resulting in the deaths of over a thousand Americans? Who could possibly envision THAT scenario?? In this administration, the far out, unlikely shit is what always seems to be happening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbyboucher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
100. That's just plain idiotic. Let it go?
What if it was some sort of medical device that he had to wear? Do you think the people should know their *President is under some kind of care that requires him to be monitored?

Don't be dumb, this is important. Even if it was a device for receiving transmissions. No matter what it was, it is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good find!
I wish I could read the entire article.

Speaking of Titan....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fusions_Minion Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
48. awesome pic!
Look at that atmosphere! beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
81. You CAN read the entire article
At the link in the original post, go to the bottom and get a 'free day pass'. All you have to do is sit through a commercial - which I did as I was typing up this reply. :evilgrin: They are getting trickier though, you need to hit 'next' a few times to progress through the ad.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #81
102. Thanks for the info! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. The "empty suit"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Could have been a bone conduction receiver.
Edited on Thu Oct-28-04 10:39 PM by yellowcanine
I once saw a kid wearing a device draped over his shoulders that conducted music through his collar bone - no headphones needed. Anyone else ever see anything like this or am I totally whacked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trueblew Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Just saw this on slashdot.org...SwiMP3 uses bone conduction.
"Aquatic training product manufacturer Finis has just released a waterproof digital music portable for swimmers and surfers that claims to solve a problem with such devices in the water. Regular earphones don't work well because they need an uninterrupted air channel to function. What makes the SwiMP3 unique is that it uses bone conduction to stimulate the inner ear and deliver sound."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That is one uneven spinal column
I don't think Bush ever mentioned having scoliosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. shit, I didn't even need the day pass!!!
I hate to say it outloud, but is that shit for real???? ROTFLMAO!!!! A bad shirt??? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
63. Actually, it looks more like a "fly swatter".....
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 04:28 AM by coreystone
does any one notice the rectangular shape at the top where the shape seems to be just as equal on the upper left as the right? It appears this way more profoundly in the image on the right. Then there seems to be a "wire??" at the bottom, veering off to his left hip.


:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
64. you know he just might have gotten away with it.....
if he had stopped slouching over the podium like a fucking jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Naw. Bush would NEVER cheat...
He's God's chosen son. The pristine cheerleader. Our fighting warrior commander in chief.

So what was that under his shirt? The pocket fisherman, of course. He was agoin' fishin' after the 'bate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. This will eventually come out, no?
Maybe in the upcoming War Crimes trial.

Seriously, when Bush and the Repubs lose, it's all fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. yes!!! well said. . .(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. LOL!!!....Yes Karma!!!...Why did that Sky Lab go down Bush???
I'm sure he knows the answer.

But despite this mystery, It's nice to see NASA
take a stand against evil!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
68. Whoa there!
This is not "NASA taking a stand against evil", collectively. The article is careful to point out that the guy did this on his own time, with his own equipment. That's an important distinction: you can imagine the sort of shit NASA would catch if this administration could pretend that taxpayer dollars were being spent on discrediting the primate-in-chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think this guy is obviously
either a friggen genius, or just a common visually unimpaired human life form.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kiss your government funding
goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gafbil1992 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now we know how he got through Yale....
F'n cheater
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Good point!!
Prolly so!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. Good thing * doesn't believe in science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukakis88 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. Totally -- Rove probably told him it was Jesus talking to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBB555 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Lying POS...NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. i think what looks like a wire is in fact. . .
a straw of the camel back-breaking kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. My guess is it IS a wire but the
Democrats ran interference on it and caused it to mal-function most of the time and Bush could only get part of the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. makes sense to me(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
95. If it is a wire
It must be as thick as an extention cord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. "Let me finish!"
Who were you talkin' to, Guv Vanilli?

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/

More evidence that Smirko McCokestroke is a crook. Great article. Thanks for the heads-up, RationalRose!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. This was so obvious from the start....
Anyone who is pro-Bush at this point is in a complete fantasy world cause remember Cheney said today that "Iraq is going remarkably well". I mean if they can get away with that and not phase thier people I doubt this will.

Its good to see comfirmation of we all said was the case when it happened! Kudos brave NASA dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. Wha-whaa-what? Is he suggesting that President Bush would actually...
LIE!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
46. "If force me into early retirement, it'll be worth it if public knows...."
He thinks it's important. From the article:

Nelson admits that he's a Democrat and plans to vote for John Kerry. But he takes umbrage at being accused of partisanship. "Everyone wants to think my colleague and I are just a bunch of dope-crazed ravaged Democrats who are looking to insult the president at the last minute," he says. "And that's not what this is about. This is scientific analysis. If the bulge were on Bill Clinton's back and he was lying about it, I'd have to say the same thing."

"Look, he says, "I'm putting myself at risk for exposing this. But this is too important. It's not about my reputation. If they force me into an early retirement, it'll be worth it if the public knows about this. It's outrageous statements that I read that the president is wearing nothing under there. There's clearly something there."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
47. But couldn't it have just been some sort of device...
... designed to keep the excess shirt material gathered in back, so that the viewable portions of the shirt would remain unwrinkled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Why not just wear a smaller fucking shirt? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #50
61. It's not an issue of shirt size.
Dress shirts like those worn by the candidates would tend to bunch up in the front and wrinkle, due to the suit coats being worn.

Just a fucking thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #61
105. ANYONE WHO HAS EVER
...served in the military knows a neat trick--you use masking tape under your dress blouse (civilian: jacket) to keep all in place. Critical when posing for photos or standing inspection. Models use this trick as well to "tailor" clothes perfectly to their bodies for photoshoots. The best bit is that the tape is not apparent under the coat.

Now, weewee served in the military....someone should have told him about this clever trick? Oh, but wait--he NEVER went to OFFICER training...he went from enlisted boot camp straight to flight school! And he probably rarely, if ever, stood inspection!

So, if it was just a lumpy shirt, a single former military officer on his staff might have saved the day...it's what he gets for praising the military while refusing to take any advice from them!

But for the record, I still think it was a transmitter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #105
107. "But for the record, I still think it was a transmitter!"
Oh, I do, as well. But hadn't seen the "shirt wrinkle protection" angle previously discussed, and thought it would add variety to the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
96. I don't fucking know
but that's what it fucking looks like to me to. Bunched up and stiched fucking material. Horizontal and fucking vertical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
49. Thanks for posting, RationalRose. IMO this is not another dumbass issue.
Being caught in one lie does not make Bush a liar. Being caught in lie after lie after lie, about matters both grave and of no importance whatsoever, reflects on Bush's character to the point that none but the truly deluded can believe that he possesses the moral compass that would qualify him to lead.

Will this single revelation change anyone's vote? Is his lying worse than his war crimes? Nope, and nope.

But in the aftermath of the election, when we will have to work to either unite the country behind Kerry or mitigate the harm of four more Bush years, all this evidence - his wire, his TANG record, his denial of what Pat Robertson said and so much more - will be needed to form a comprehensive portrait of a man unworthy to lead.

Those of us old enough to remember Nixon can recall that, for some people, it took the revelation of minor flaws like his coarse language, as well as major flaws like his enemies list, to help them realize that he was not a man of honor. So will it be with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
51. Nelson is an old time KPFK show host from the 80's
Good to see him back in the media, however he ought to be applying his talents to more useful inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. he has chosen to follow a story that will prove
resonant to all americans in time. evil is in the details, especially details that speak to perversions of standards re: honesty, fair play, etc. i believe that all who work to expose corruption should be encouraged and their works not judged by others as less than useful, diverting, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Bob can of course do this if he wants to
And I would love to see him embarrass the hell out of the chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. yep. and i think that he will. it's the older radical journalists
who are attracted to this story, it seems to me, and their skills were honed years ago, but without supportive venues, they've had less to do than they did in the late '60s-mid '70s. i am so happy to see these embers igniting. forgive us old guys for our stubborn focus, but there are so many folks covering the bigger stories--and doing fine work--that i know that a slow and steady approach to an apparently minor mystery will yield results. but even if not, what is the harm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmaki Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
52. While I think there is something there,
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 01:48 AM by gmaki
I doubt it is a wire and I doubt it matters.

But this guys "analysis" is hogwash in my opinion. It is very unclear how he captured his images. Then all he did was apply a heavy dose of unsharp mask once he got his capture.

First unsharp mask DOES alter the image contrary to what the article says and the way it works to fool the eye into perceiving sharpness guarantees that it would result in the appearance of a wire under the jacket.

Here is an experiment I did to demonstrate how unsharp mask can create the illusion of a "wire" where there originally was no evidence of one whatsoever.

This first image is a gradient on the right side and flat gray on the left, with the transition between the two blurred so that unsharp mask has something to work on. 3 dimensionally this would be like a flat surface on the left with a convex drop off on the right (no raised area at the transition).



This is the same image with heavy unsharp mask applied. Because of the way unsharp masks tricks your eye to define the transition, by brightening pixels on the bright side and darkening them on the darker side, it gives the illusion of a raised section at the transition, like a wire underneath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Nice try
but the lighting on Bush's back did NOT involve a flat gray area on the left and a concave gradient on the right. Further, this object is clearly visible in multiple photos, in more than one outfit on more than one occasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
53. bush did NOT say it was a wrinkled shirt. he started off by saying that
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 01:50 AM by truthisfreedom
it was an electronic device, then he waffled and said that he would be "embarrassed to say" that it was a "poorly-tailored shirt", then he went on to retract that it was an electronic device.

the important thing to remember is...
he said that karen and dan rigged up a sound system, and he NEVER said that there was no MAGNETIC device nor did he say there wasn't a BONE CONDUCTION mechanism.

these people are parse-perfect, but lie through their teeth.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/5052535.html

When asked about the bulge that appeared as he and Sen. John Kerry debated Sept. 30 in Coral Gables, Fla., Bush tantalized conspiracy theorists by saying, ``Well, you know, Karen Hughes and Dan Bartlett had rigged up a sound system ...''


``You are getting in trouble,'' responded host Charles Gibson.


``I don't know what that is,'' Bush said. ``I mean, it is - I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt.''


Bush {then} said there was no sound system or electrical signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
57. this is a baby story: not yet time to bloom, but
it will be huge after kerry wins, implicating the mainstream media and validating the persistence of a very few bloggers= a welcomed new media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JawJaw Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
62. WooooHoooooo - Look-a-me unka dick !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #62
70. LOL. I had JetPac on my Spectrum 48k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
65. it's pinky and the brain
it's pinky and the brain, it's pinky and the brain, one is a genius, the other insane........... I can't get this song out of my head:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
66. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
71. It's the freaking double standard
Had Clinton or Kerry done this - the Repubs would be up in arms, wanting a commission to investigate and calling for their heads. It's their guy - so NOTHING is ever a big deal - its all just wild conspiracy tales - even with the evidence staring them straight in the face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #71
99. As a matter of fact that's exactly what they DID do
Right-wingers were all over the internet claiming that "Kerry cheated" when he pulled out a pen at the beginning of the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #99
108. Yep, you're right
how did I forget about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
72. So, Where Are ALL THE DUMBASSES NOW?
You know who I'm talking about!

Ha Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
78. Guess now that we're not going to Mars, our NASA guys have some free time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBX9501 Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
80. Information
My background is in EE. I'm no expert in communication gear but a few things to consider. I spent 20 years working with high speed electrcal switching gear and have seen equipment shrink 100 fold.

The smallest public tranciever for 2 way av is smaller than a credit card. You can buy one online. It sends an encrypted signal.

I have heard of gear that allows a mic and transmitter to fit inside something the size of a human hair.

I have seen twinax cables that ran between servers that were smaller than that. That is just WAY to big for any type of communication gear. IMHO.

He is a loser but this looks fishy to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #80
83. Who Say's It's DEFINITELY Comunication Gear?
One thing that's almost certain, IT AIN'T HIS FUCKING SHIRT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBX9501 Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. If not comm gear
What then? It doesn't look like a ceramic plate for a vest.

It is hard to draw a conclusion from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. The Guy Draws Conclusions For A Living for NASA W/ Less Data
I'll take his word that it's SOMETHING and it ain't a shirt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBX9501 Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. It looks weird for sure.
If not comm gear what?(rhetorical) I just don't see a reason to sneak something other than comm gear into a debate.

The only thing I have ever seen that resembles that is a portable EEG/EKG recorder. Strange for sure..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Yeah, I Have No Idea
Your guess is as good as mine! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #89
106. Or a medical pump
...to provide a steady dose of medication for a cancerous condition. Or a TENS unit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
85. As much as I'd love to believe it, planetary analysis and suit-clad chimps
are two entirely different beasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
87. I'VE GOT IT! I'VE GOT IT! I'VE GOT IT!
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 12:15 PM by colorado_ufo
What has haunted me from the first time I saw this was that it looked like the heating device used under water bed mattresses - which made no sense. Then, I had a flashback from years ago when I worked for an oncologist (cancer doctor). This is a TENS unit, a Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation unit for control of intense, intractable pain. It is used for cancer pain, severe arthritis, debilitating injury, etc. Please take a look at some of the units through the link below!

http://www.bodyclock.net/acatalog/tenselectrodes.html

Yes, this is it! It would also explain why he can't run anymore and has looked so tired - pain is extremely fatiguing. It could be cancer, but he could also have ruptured a disc or have some other problem that he could not have addressed during the campaign.

On edit: Most of the electrodes are small, but there could certainly be a custom design for *, or several could be positioned in a central pad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Considering all the data
it seems like Colorado_ufo does have a very plausible explanation. Because that also ties in with how awful Bush has been looking lately.

I also thought that it would be real amatuer hour to rig bush so obviously, unless they did it and never trotted him out under stage lights to see if it would show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LiberalBushFan Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
91. If you're taking your oral qualifying exams or something similar
and you're caught using a wire to have the answers fed to you, you for sure get expelled from that school. But if it's the just the debate for leader of the free world, and you cheat on that, no big deal.

Then again Bush probably would get away with the former situation as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
93. Some are asking how it could be that Bush* wore a 'device'...
...and still did such a horrible job in the debates. The answer is that he is prone to freezing up and mumbling when he's under pressure to answer a direct question. He would have really made a fool of himself without the ques being fed to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
97. Maybe * and O'Reilly have more than stupidity in common...
after all, we know O'Reilly likes to use battery-powered marital aids while he listens to himself talk...maybe that's the battery pack for Shrubbie's playtoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
109. Most people do not remember that
Edited on Fri Oct-29-04 02:58 PM by tblue37
one of the specific rules established in the debate agreement was that there would be NO camera shots from the back. The Bush team didn't think they would need to have a tiny, tiny easy-to-disguise unit, because they didn't think that anyone would ever see a shot of Bush's back. Of course, the camera feeds violated the rules, and we got to see not only split screens but also the backs of the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC