Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dossier 'over-egged' Iraq weapons claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:57 AM
Original message
Dossier 'over-egged' Iraq weapons claims
(This is evidence from weapons experts in the MoD. Don't get your hopes up - Hutton is inclined to take the official line that Scarlett and the JIC were better judges than these people with scientific knowledge about and long term experience of WMD)


Dossier 'over-egged' Iraq weapons claims

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3077830.stm

...
Brian Jones, who managed scientists working at the Defence Intelligence Staff, told the inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly he feared assessments of the Iraqi threat were being "over-egged" as the dossier was compiled.

....


In an e-mail to Dr Kelly the day after the dossier was published, Mr A <unnamed official who gave evidence by videophone> raised his doubts about government claims about Iraq's Al-Qa'qa plant, adding: "You will recall ....(a person's name has been blanked out) admitted they were grasping at straws."


He had written too of "our view that you and I should have been more involved in this than the spin merchants of this administration".

Mr A told the inquiry: "The perception was that the dossier had been round the houses several times in order to try to find a form of words which could strengthen certain political objectives."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. First it was 'over'sexed' now it's 'over egged ' -
sounds like a half-baked recipe for disaster whatever way you look at it.
Bottom line: someone fed them a story ("we will crush them like bugs"...)and they swallowed it. Now the whole thing tastes pretty sick because the heat in the kitchen got so bad, they had to send in inpsectors to check it out. Next, the sous-chef dropped dead ("for when he got there, the cupboard was bare"....), just after pointing the finger at the spinning machine. Will it now end as: 'and now, over here'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. How many
different phrases can they invent for 'lied'????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stumblnrose Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can someone please translate for me...
...the difference between "over-egging" and over-sexing"? Since turning to the British media for most of my international news, and I rely more on The Independent than The Guardian, which seems still to be looking for proof of Blair's ultimate exoneration, I have been exposed to words and word usages that leave me oft-times puzzled. So I'm just asking if eggs and sex are the same or is there some subtle difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjbcar27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Right...

Dr. Kelly allegedly used the phrase 'sexed up' to describe how the dossier was embellished.

At the Hutton enquiry today, a witness suggested that the government had 'over-egged' some of the intelligence in the dossier.

It all boils down to the same thing though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exaggeration in other words
Edited on Wed Sep-03-03 12:17 PM by Thankfully_in_Britai
And reading the September dossier it is apparent that the dossier was written with the intention of frightening people. The language in it was clearly designed to make you worry about Saddam's nasty weapons that no longer seem to exist. :eyes: I don't think that they could have written the document in this fashion without exaggerating the threat of Saddam on the basis of what we know now.

As to the article, this bit interests me. Make of this what you will.

"Mr A", an unnamed civil servant in the MoD's counter-proliferation and arms department, gave his evidence via videophone, without revealing his face.

Dr Kelly had invited "Mr A" to a meeting on 19 September check a draft of the dossier for factual errors. Dr Kelly himself had suggested 12-14 changes on technical issues.

The 45-minute claim had been discussed because it was something which "seemed to rather beg more questions than it answered".

In an e-mail to Dr Kelly the day after the dossier was published, Mr A raised his doubts about government claims about Iraq's Al-Qa'qa plant, adding: "You will recall ....(a person's name has been blanked out) admitted they were grasping at straws."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Semantics... Semantics... How 'bout just saying .."They LIED"??
Edited on Wed Sep-03-03 12:23 PM by SoCalDem
It's so much simpler, and says exactly what happened..

Would we accept this kind of nonsense from our kids??

Mom:.. Well, Johnny, how did the car get that big dent in the fender??

Johnny:.."What dent"?? That looks like a shadow, to me...

Mom:..."That's a dent"..

Johnny:.. "No, Mom, it must be a flaw in the paint, that may have caused erosion of the underlying metallic substance"..


etc..etc..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC