Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: New Woes Surface in Use of Estimates (exit polls "behaving badly")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:11 PM
Original message
WP: New Woes Surface in Use of Estimates (exit polls "behaving badly")
Exit Polls
New Woes Surface in Use of Estimates

By Richard Morin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 4, 2004; Page A29


An Election Day filled with unexpected twists ended with a familiar question: What went wrong with the network exit polls?

In two previous national elections, the exit polls had behaved badly. Premature calls by the networks in Florida led to a congressional investigation in 2000. Two years later, a computer meltdown resulted in no release of data on Election Day.

On Tuesday, new problems surfaced: a 2 1/2-hour data blackout and samples that at one point or another included too many women, too few Westerners, not enough Republicans and a lead for Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry in the national survey that persisted until late in the evening....

***

Election Day 2004 was a roller-coaster ride for the two presidential candidates and for the political press corps. Successive waves of the national exit poll in the afternoon and evening reported that Kerry had a two- or three-percentage-point lead over Bush nationally and in several key states, including Ohio.

Preliminary exit poll results had leaked throughout the day and were posted on a number of Web sites, including the widely viewed Drudge Report site, which added to the confusion and fanned the media frenzy.

To compound the problem further, a server at Edison/Mitofsky malfunctioned shortly before 11 p.m. The glitch prevented access to any exit poll results until technicians got a backup system operational at 1:33 a.m. yesterday.

The crash occurred barely minutes before the consortium was to update its exit polling with the results of later interviewing that found Bush with a one-point lead. Instead, journalists were left relying on preliminary exit poll results released at 8:15 p.m., which still showed Kerry ahead by three percentage points.

It was only after the polls had closed in most states and the vote count was well underway in the East that it became clear that Bush was in a stronger position in several key battlegrounds, including Ohio, than early exit polls suggested....


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23580-2004Nov3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eyah - uh huh. Riiight. Naughty exit polls! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're covering their trail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yep
I hear that other countries use the exit polls to verify the results of elections, rather than as a media fascination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah, the exit polls have behaved badly since Bush has been involved...
Kind of makes you go "hmmm."

I wonder two things: One, if the exit polls were so unreliable, why are the networks using them to tell us what's wrong with the Democratic Party?

Two, why do they consider them wrong in 2000 when they predicted how people TRIED to vote, even if somehow those votes got overvoted?

Okay, and three, will the media ever do what the media is supposed to do and question whether maybe the exit polls were right and something else was wrong? You know the old Sherlock Holmes credo, "Eliminate all false answers, and the answer that remains, no matter how improbably, is true."

Our media won't question the improbably. They won't make anyone angry. Who was the journalist who said "Journalism should make those in power angry. If it says what they want it to say, it isn't journalism, it's advertising?"

Both of those quotes were approximated. My memory is tired and my Google skills are on vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Yep
It's just the darnedest thing, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Our new "urban legend"
I was listening to NPR on Electio Day and they were prattling on and on about how wrong the exit polls were in Florida for 2000. The problem is, of course, that the exit polls predicted Gore to be the winner -- and he clearly won in the recount completed several months later.

So why are the pundits talking about how "wrong" the exit polls are, when clearly they are accurate? Because it helps their corporate master to steal the next election. Exit polls are an accurate check of voter sentiment on election day, and if the actual results don't co-relate with the exit polls, you have strong evidence of fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD!! INVESTIGATE THAT!!!!!
A*holes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sure, and chimp will "reveal the truth about WMD" too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. What has never been done
and now should be in light of all this conflicting commentary is a scientific poll of Ohioans and Floridians, who are willing to affirm that they had voted on Nov. 2, conducted on the day after the election to see how closely it compares with the Diebold results.

None of this is going to change anything, but it is amazing how quickly Charlie Gibson comes to the defense of Diebold and the GOP here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Ohio uses mostly punchcards
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 12:28 PM by LibDemAlways
and saves the most decrepit machines for the minority areas. Greg Palast called the rabid repuke SOS's office in Ohio and asked for the over and undervote totals. Was hung up on twice. Also said that untold numbers of minority voters were challenged at the polls and given provisional ballots, who knows how many of which will simply be tossed.

I heard Palast on Pacifica Radio in LA this am. His article "What Happened in Ohio?" is must-reading on tompaine.com. His conclusion: Kerry won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Also, many people were discouraged from voting
because of long lines in the districts using the decrepit machines. The weather went bad around 5:00 -- many people didn't want to get into long lines, knowing it would take hours and hours and they still might not get to vote.

If anybody wants to blame somebody, they can just blame Ken Blackwell -- he's the one who did this, and he did it on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Diebold machines were deployed all over Ohio to Democratic precincts
My family encountered problems with Diebold machines and voter suppression in Ohio.

There is good reason to believe that this election was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just coincidence
that things always go wrong when the Bushies are involved? The mainstream media is so damn lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. The mainstream media is way beyond lazy. They are the problem
They are biased because they are corrupt, especially the broadcast media and cable news.

The only reason that someone as lazy and ignorant as W can get elected president is that the media is creating false images and protecting him.

Plus there is the right-wing media that creates all kinds of noise when Kerry mentions that the Cheney's daughter is a lesbian and is silent about 380 tons of explosives disappearing.

A significant number of americans think Rush Limbaugh is journalism. More than 50% of Americans probably think Crossfire is journalism.

It's the attempt by corporate media to make news coverage a profitable business instead of a public service as well as the agenda of the corporations that own the media outlets that corrupts news coverage.

This corruption is why many of us think that W supporters are simply idiots. They aren't. They're just misinformed to the point of brainwashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. DON'T ASK QUESTIONS!!!
Just accept your new Republican Overlords and their god given mandate! It's for the best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Who you gonna believe? The Diebold main terminal...or your lyin' eyes?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. The mediawhores keep hitting this over and over...
so that people will believe the exit polls were flawed....They never mention the fact that there were many states where exit polls were correct to 0.1%...and those with a wide margin of error were either Touch Screen or Punch Card states.


Repeat ANYTHING often enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hmmmmmm! Have
the considered the fact that it may not be the exit polls but he voting machines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm sure they've considered it
They won't be reporting it, however. See my post on the media above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. I worked as an exit poller...
and while i cannot attest to the methodology used, i can verify that this was extremely well run on the grass roots level.

- i was called to be sure my materials arrived safely
- i was called to be reminded of my phone training session
- i was called the next day after training to see if i had questions and /or feedback
- i was required to make 4 phone calls during election day at appointed times. it wouldn't have surprised me if i got busy signals or put on hold, but in fact ALL four times my call was handled immediately.

bottom line: a very impressive, well organized effort on the part of Edison/Mitofsky.

one thing i'd like clarified: when was the final exit poll report released? is this the one that's being quoted now, or was it modified, and if so, by whom?

And if there was a late wave of Bush vote, why was that so? Who were those people? Or was this when the "adjustments" were made to the black boxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC