Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Powell: U.S. Will Remain Military Leader in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:15 PM
Original message
Powell: U.S. Will Remain Military Leader in Iraq
By Dana Milbank

The Bush administration is presenting a draft resolution today to U.N. Security Council members that would leave the United States as "leader of the military coalition" in Iraq but reporting to the United Nations, Secretary of State Colin Powell said today.

In a briefing for reporters, Powell said the United States would not relinquish its "dominant role" in Iraq even as it goes to the world body to seek authorization for a multinational force in that country. "The U.S. will remain the commander of the unified command, and there will be an element in the resolution that calls upon the United States, as the leader of the military coalition, to report on a regular basis to the United Nations, since it is a United Nations-authorized multinational force, if the resolution passes," Powell said.

The nation's chief diplomat called the decision to seek a new resolution "a new effort with respect to our diplomatic efforts to generate international support for Iraq." But, like other administration officials, Powell portrayed the decision to seek U.N. support as an evolution in Bush's plan in Iraq that was consistent with its early intentions. "This is all part of the president's strategy of making sure that this is an international operation," Powell said. "He's said that from the very beginning." The secretary described the effort as "an evolutionary process" and said the resolution is "of the kind that I have suggested to you for a number of weeks."

The Bush administration is struggling to recruit international troops to support its efforts in Iraq, where 140,000 U.S. troops are straining under extended tours of duty and mounting casualties. The United States has had trouble getting commitments from a sufficient number of nations without U.N. sanction. Powell, however, said the decision to seek a resolution "is not related to casualties."

So stop saying that.

Inherent in the proposal is a trade-off: a larger role for the United Nations in Iraq's civil administration in exchange for sanctioning international troops under U.S. military command. Powell said the initial response has been "positive."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20085-2003Sep3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. They just don't get it do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC