Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:50 PM
Original message
NYT: White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says
Edited on Wed Sep-03-03 10:51 PM by Nambe


Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.

The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said.

The fact that relatives of Mr. bin Laden and other Saudis had been rushed out of the country became public soon after the Sept. 11 attacks. But questions have lingered about the circumstances of their departure, and Mr. Clarke's statements provided the first acknowledgment that the White House had any direct involvement in the plan and that senior administration officials personally signed off on it.

Mr. Clarke first made his remarks about the plan in an article in Vanity Fair due out Thursday, and he expanded on those remarks today in an interview and in Congressional testimony. The White House said today that it had no comment on Mr. Clarke's statements. ---

Privatize bush It’s a Good Thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there a trend developing for the second anniversary?
Is the press, perhaps, going to tell some of the stories they should have been reporting on 9/12/01?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. No. The WH did that? Really? You're kidding. Impossible. And we
are just finding out now! It must be true. The NYT says so.

Wait a minute. I seem to recall a discussion about this in Sept. 2001...RIGHT HERE ON DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. At the very least,
this is just another example for the inequality between the rich and the poor in this country. Poor Arabs had just as much chance of "retribution" as wealthy Saudis.

At the very worst... well, I'm not even going to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. WOW, is the NYTimes really reporting this story??
If I hadn't just read it off their website I would never have believed it.

The fact that they have pointed the finger to the White House should make this another nail in bush*'s coffin.

We'll have to wait and see how the network news picks up on this. I don't care about the cable shows, Tweety, Wolfie, etc. Most Americans still get their nightly news from the Big 3 and if this is reported it should make a big splash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oops! The WH knew who was innocent on 9/11.
Turn that coin over and you get the FBI busting guilty people within hours. So many facts, so few explanations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. The scottsman this morning NYT tonight Woooooo Hooooo
Anyone who supports bush is a traitor to the security of our nation .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. amen, sister!
"Anyone who supports bush is a traitor to the security of our nation"

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just goes to show you Snopes can be full of shit
and didn't they (admin) already deny that this happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I wonder how snopes.com will respond to this, NSMA...
they were adamant that this was not the correct story. We shall see how this plays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. My "comment" to Snopes
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flight.htm
http://www.snopes.com/cgi-bin/comments/comments.asp
http://www.snopes.com/message/

Here is new information, hot off the press from the New York Times pertaining to:

Flight of Fancy
Claim: Two days after September 11 -- while all other planes were grounded -- a secret flight arranged by George W. Bush flew Osama bin Laden's relatives out of the USA.
Status: False.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flight.htm

White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says

WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.

The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flight.htm

IMHO, the status should be changed to True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. First things first: Louis Freeh, you're under arrest.
Edited on Wed Sep-03-03 11:07 PM by Octafish
Then, soon: "George W Bush, a jury of your peers has found you guilty of treason..."

EDIT: punctuation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well It looks like that is a CONFIRM! New YorK times!Finally!
Its so good that the American News is finally catching up!

This is a Major Major Break through! :bounce:

I sent this to my Republican Friend! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here's the link, more info
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/politics/04SAUD.html?ex=1063252800&en=808be44ae0b6c3aa&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

Check this paragraph out from the article:

"Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11."

And then check out this entry from my 9/11 Timeline for more on these two:

September 11, 1996: An FBI investigation into two relatives of bin Laden, begun in February 1996, is closed. The FBI wanted to learn more about Abdullah bin Laden, "because of his relationship with the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) - a suspected terrorist organization." (Guardian, 11/7/01) Abdullah was the US director of WAMY and lived with his brother Omar in Falls Church, Virginia, a town just outside Washington. The coding on the document, marked secret, indicates the case involved espionage, murder, and national security. WAMY has its offices at 5613 Leesburg Pike. Remarkably, it is later determined that four of the 9/11 hijackers lived at 5913 Leesburg Pike at the same time the two bin Laden brothers were there. WAMY has not been put on a list of terrorist organizations in the US, but it has been banned in Pakistan. (BBC Newsnight, 11/6/01, Guardian, 11/7/01) The Bosnian government later says a charity with Abdullah bin Laden on its board had channeled money to Chechen guerrillas, something that "is only possible because the Clinton CIA gave the wink and nod to WAMY and other groups who were aiding Bosnian guerrillas when they were fighting Serbia, a US-approved enemy." The investigation into WAMY is only restarted two days after 9/11, and after the bin Laden brothers have left the US. (Best Democracy Money Can Buy, by Greg Palast, 2/03)

So even while the FBI was arresting Muslims, including literally by looking up random names in the phone book, they were letting go two bin Laden relatives that they knew from a previous investigation had direct ties to al-Qaeda. They restart an investigation into these two the same day they let them leave the country!

But these two were not the only bin Laden relatives with such ties. Here are a few more timeline entries:

February 2001 (B): A former CIA anti-terror expert later claims that an allied intelligence agency sees "two of Osama's sisters apparently taking cash to an airport in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), where they are suspected of handing it to a member of bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization." This is cited as one of many incidents showing an "interconnectedness" between Osama bin Laden and the rest of his family. (New Yorker, 11/5/01)

February 26, 2001: Bin Laden attends the wedding of his son Mohammad in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Although bin Laden is supposedly long estranged from his family, bin Laden's stepmother, two brothers and sister are also said to have attended, according to the only journalist who was invited. (Reuters, 3/1/01, Sunday Herald, 10/7/01)

July 4-14, 2001: Bin Laden, America's most wanted criminal with a $5 million bounty on his head, supposedly receives lifesaving treatment for renal failure from American surgeon specialist Dr. Callaway at the American hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. He is possibly accompanied by al-Qaeda #2 Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri plus several bodyguards. Callaway later refuses to answer any questions on this matter. (Le Figaro, 10/31/01, Agence France-Presse, 11/1/01, London Times, 11/01/01) During his stay, bin Laden is visited by "several members of his family and Saudi personalities," including Prince Turki al Faisal, then head of Saudi intelligence, as well as two CIA officers. (Guardian, 11/1/01)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Speaking of Snopes
I've sent Snopes this link:

The Phantom Flight from Florida
The Tampa Tribune, October 5, 2001

http://www.unansweredquestions.org/timeline/2001/tampatribune100501.html

and other such links, but they've always refused to change their "urban legend" page. Read the above link if you want to know more details on these mysterious flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Details and trivia about that location.
"and lived with his brother Omar in Falls Church, Virginia, a town just outside Washington. The coding on the document, marked secret, indicates the case involved espionage, murder, and national security. WAMY has its offices at 5613 Leesburg Pike. Remarkably, it is later determined that four of the 9/11 hijackers lived at 5913 Leesburg Pike at the same time the two bin Laden brothers were there."

The specific region of Falls Church where these addresses are located is called Bailey's Crossroads. This area has a dense concentration of new immigrants from all over the world, most of whom do not speak English. It also boasts one of the few mosques in the area.

A little tidbit of trivia: The WAMY office was next to what was once the Alexandria Airport, but the "Skyline" has changed significantly since it closed in the 1960s. One of the residential highrise buildings, developed on land that was once the airport, had a portion collapse during construction in the 1970s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. Right wingers said that Michael Moore made that up
Even Snopes (who seems to defend Bush more often than not) said it wasn't true.

I guess Michael Moore bashers have some appologizing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dupe... locking
Although the reports are from different stories, this is esssentially the same story that was first posted here on LBN:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=95261

Nambe, you New York Times link would be helpful within the earlier thread.

Thanks!
VolcanoJen
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC